Gen 5 Camaro Racing Tech, Results Drag racing, road racing, street racing. Share tech & results!

So they can run fast at the track afterall :) Bone stock LS3 SS runs 12.87 quarter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2009, 09:18 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
BalzOnYer4Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking So they can run fast at the track afterall :) Bone stock LS3 SS runs 12.87 quarter

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33047

Supposedly that guy's first time at the track with his 2010 camaro and car only has 500 miles on it so far.

Looks like a lot of the others who ran a quarter mile and posted crappy times earlier were newbs to the track or didnt know how to properly launch this car.
Old 07-19-2009, 10:02 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
DaveX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That is a great time but I am suspicious. Not all the times posted so far have been from inexperienced drivers and this is substantially better.
Old 07-19-2009, 10:06 AM
  #3  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 32,987
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

I believe the times. Mine went 13.0 in much worse weather. I could have gotten a 12.9 with any sub 2.0 60' time. It is all about practice, and getting a feel for the car. They will go 12.6s in cold weather bone stock, count on it. Even my pass corrects down to a 12.71 in better weather.
Old 07-19-2009, 10:09 AM
  #4  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,655
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

I believe it, Robin L. went 13.doh at the same track stock too. And it's been unsually cool on some days up here, heck yesterday morning it was 59F at 8AM!
Old 07-20-2009, 04:29 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
BalzOnYer4Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the only other time I've seen a sub 13 second run reported on a stock car was motortrend's results. But I think that might have been with a gtech and not at the track?
Old 07-20-2009, 05:00 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
silplu83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mass
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BalzOnYer4Head
I think the only other time I've seen a sub 13 second run reported on a stock car was motortrend's results. But I think that might have been with a gtech and not at the track?
Yea that was a Gtech.
Old 07-20-2009, 06:01 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Bah...still not good enough. It wont be good enough until someone runs a 12.6 maybe 12.7.....remember 4th gen cars ran 12's all day.
Old 07-20-2009, 07:52 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
Bah...still not good enough. It wont be good enough until someone runs a 12.6 maybe 12.7.....remember 4th gen cars ran 12's all day.
i wouldnt say all day but they ran it enough.



i think 5th gens are capable of a 12.6 based on their trap speed.
Old 07-20-2009, 11:43 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
navyblueSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Jonesboro, LA
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ULTIMATEORANGESS
i wouldnt say all day but they ran it enough.



i think 5th gens are capable of a 12.6 based on their trap speed.
I agree, we will be seeing 12.60s popping up out of these cars when the cooler temps arrive.
Old 07-21-2009, 01:32 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
 
gap4annie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ULTIMATEORANGESS
i wouldnt say all day but they ran it enough.



i think 5th gens are capable of a 12.6 based on their trap speed.
That'll be fun to see. Think the car is capable of 11's with just a tune?
Old 07-21-2009, 04:07 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
liqidvenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
Bah...still not good enough. It wont be good enough until someone runs a 12.6 maybe 12.7.....remember 4th gen cars ran 12's all day.
are the 4th gens running 12's bone stock down to the tire and at show room weight?

if so thats news to me
Old 07-21-2009, 07:01 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gap4annie
That'll be fun to see. Think the car is capable of 11's with just a tune?

no, but i think a catback and CAI with a tune and tires itll hit 11s. with a great driver of course.
Old 07-21-2009, 07:07 PM
  #13  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
woodsls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: terre haute
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

can anyone help me it seems my track time is slower than i expected
Old 07-21-2009, 07:48 PM
  #14  
Teching In
 
1GXP4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That is the best M6 pass Ive seen but still slower than me w/ more power, less weight and better weather.
Old 07-21-2009, 08:24 PM
  #15  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 32,987
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by liqidvenom
are the 4th gens running 12's bone stock down to the tire and at show room weight?

if so thats news to me
Most of them don't. Most M6 drivers can barely run 13s due to no skill. I put two bone stock LS1 f-bodies into the 12.8s with zero mods and zero weight removal. That was almost a decade ago, in cold weather on a great track. The same cars in the summer were 13.2 cars.

The 2010 Camaro is quicker than the 4th gen, sorry that some of you guys are in denial. My 2010 went 13.0 in HOT weather, with a crappy 2.05 60' time. None of my dozen or so LS1 f-bodies ran 13.doh in the heat.
Old 07-21-2009, 09:29 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
 
OrangeChevyII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My 2010 went a 12.77 in 86 degree heat and a near 2700 DA. Tuned and a muffler, stock rubber with a 1.89 short time. Stock weight at 3985.
Old 07-21-2009, 09:58 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
ex-SS-ve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nine Ball
Most of them don't. Most M6 drivers can barely run 13s due to no skill. I put two bone stock LS1 f-bodies into the 12.8s with zero mods and zero weight removal. That was almost a decade ago, in cold weather on a great track. The same cars in the summer were 13.2 cars.

The 2010 Camaro is quicker than the 4th gen, sorry that some of you guys are in denial. My 2010 went 13.0 in HOT weather, with a crappy 2.05 60' time. None of my dozen or so LS1 f-bodies ran 13.doh in the heat.
cant tell them that. because to them their 4th gen is better than the 2010 in every way. kind of like how a 3rd gen is better than a 4th to the 3rd gen owner!
Old 07-21-2009, 10:43 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
liqidvenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Nine Ball
Most of them don't. Most M6 drivers can barely run 13s due to no skill. I put two bone stock LS1 f-bodies into the 12.8s with zero mods and zero weight removal. That was almost a decade ago, in cold weather on a great track. The same cars in the summer were 13.2 cars.

The 2010 Camaro is quicker than the 4th gen, sorry that some of you guys are in denial. My 2010 went 13.0 in HOT weather, with a crappy 2.05 60' time. None of my dozen or so LS1 f-bodies ran 13.doh in the heat.
this is what i thought...


i'm sure gm put the 5th gen up against every benchmark set by the 4th gen and made sure they could beat it in every way possible
Old 07-21-2009, 11:04 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default



hey Tony.. i met someone you "might" know...

name is John Lamb.. bought a black 2000 trans am brand new... he was going stock internals and got real close to be up on the top of the list.. he is from TN..

he was a moderator he said when tech.com first started up.. but then phased out of it..

he was showing me some video of when the shootout was up at beech bend.. your car and colonels? car along with a few more quick cars..

just wondering, you probably dont.. but..
Old 07-21-2009, 11:07 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by liqidvenom
i'm sure gm put the 5th gen up against every benchmark set by the 4th gen and made sure they could beat it in every way possible
why in the hell would they do this? or why would they care..

the 4th gen isnt even in the same class... nor is it in production anymore..

it was going up against the challengers/mustang/etc..


ls1s dont run 12s all day long.. nor is it anywhere close to the norm... its more like a needly in the hay stack..

ls1s are low-mid 13 cars.. some bad drivers are slower, some good drivers are faster.. but that is the "norm"..

the 5th gen is running low 13s with bad drivers and hitting high 12s with good drivers.. times will only get better..

some of you boys with stockish cars talking **** on the 5th gen are going to be mad when you line up against one.


Quick Reply: So they can run fast at the track afterall :) Bone stock LS3 SS runs 12.87 quarter



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 PM.