11.58 @ 125...on my aeroforce

[UltraZLS1]

How accurate are these things? I have an aeroforce interceptor scan gauge that will measure 1/4 mile. I recently ran a few times and my best time was an 11.58 @ 125 mph. Has anyone used one of these and compared it to real track times? I have done some searching and most claim the mph is fairly accurate but the ET will be further off the more spin because the car thinks you are covering ground when your not. My best 60ft was a 1.9. I have 305 drs but was just running on an unprepared surface. I did have some wheel spin but not all that bad. It was pretty hot out when I did it about ~80 so the road was gripping decent. Anyways..anyone have any input? and yes I know the track is what matters. But I work just about every day Milan has a test and tune. They are having one today but it looks like rain. So this will have to do for now. The next closest track is 1.5 hrs away and I would rather not go that far in case I break something. ______________

[DietCoke]

Add a second and subtract 10mph. Aeroforce gages exist in their own little world

[TheLS1Lover]

Judging by your mods thats probably really close.

[Gunslinger09]

Got to the track and that will tell the real tale.

[98TADRIVER]

never claim a G-tech or equivalent time lol.


I remember when my buddy tried telling someone what his car ran. he said 13.7.. I was there so I was sure to correct him by saying "It wasnt a 13.7, it was a 13.9 and that was on a gtech, not at a track lmao"