1243 rwhp Lingenfelter LS9 Camaro dyno graph
11-21-2010, 10:49 PM
#1
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
1243 rwhp Lingenfelter LS9 Camaro dyno graph Thought this might be of interest. Here are the dynamometer results from our LS9 powered 2010 Camaro SS. This is with both stages of nitrous (comes on around 3800 rpm). The other line is the measured supercharger speed (optical pickup on the supercharger pulley to measure belt slip).
We were at a slightly lower power level (less nitrous in the 1st stage) when we ran our 8.997 at 158.80 mph 1/4 mile pass today at MIR.
The vehicle modifications, including the engine modifications, are listed in the thread in the drag race results area.
We were at a slightly lower power level (less nitrous in the 1st stage) when we ran our 8.997 at 158.80 mph 1/4 mile pass today at MIR.
The vehicle modifications, including the engine modifications, are listed in the thread in the drag race results area.
11-22-2010, 01:55 PM
#4
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Video of 8.997 run Here is a link to the video on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJ1VUKhHGBc
We should have another video from another angle later today or tomorrow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJ1VUKhHGBc
We should have another video from another angle later today or tomorrow.
11-22-2010, 02:55 PM
#5
Congrats on the new best Jason. That's moving for a heavy Gen 5 Camaro!
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
11-25-2010, 07:51 PM
#7
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Power for the 8's in a 5th gen Yes, it takes a lot of power to get these cars in the 8's especially when the vehicle is at full weight.
The 5th Gen Camaro has a much stiffer chassis and much better ride quality and NVH while having better crash ratings compared to the previous models but it is heavier. The 5th gen cars are also larger too and the Cd is no better so they have more aero drag as well. If you have ever seen a 5th Gen next to any of the earlier generation Camaros it is pretty amazing to see how much bigger they are.
We have done some work to reduce the weight of the vehicle (race seat, V6 brakes, etc.) but then we have added weight back in to the vehicle with a roll cage, supercharger, dry sump tank, intercooler water tank, two nitrous bottles, chassis stiffening, 9.5" differential etc.
I am sure we would run quicker ET's with a turbo 400. Despite the power losses to the turbo 400, we might gain MPH too since we are loosing at least 1 mph on each shift and that wouldn't happen on an automatic since you don't stop accelerating during the shift on an automatic.
The 5th Gen Camaro has a much stiffer chassis and much better ride quality and NVH while having better crash ratings compared to the previous models but it is heavier. The 5th gen cars are also larger too and the Cd is no better so they have more aero drag as well. If you have ever seen a 5th Gen next to any of the earlier generation Camaros it is pretty amazing to see how much bigger they are.
We have done some work to reduce the weight of the vehicle (race seat, V6 brakes, etc.) but then we have added weight back in to the vehicle with a roll cage, supercharger, dry sump tank, intercooler water tank, two nitrous bottles, chassis stiffening, 9.5" differential etc.
I am sure we would run quicker ET's with a turbo 400. Despite the power losses to the turbo 400, we might gain MPH too since we are loosing at least 1 mph on each shift and that wouldn't happen on an automatic since you don't stop accelerating during the shift on an automatic.
Trending Topics
11-25-2010, 08:31 PM
#8
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oakbank MB Canada
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, it takes a lot of power to get these cars in the 8's especially when the vehicle is at full weight.
The 5th Gen Camaro has a much stiffer chassis and much better ride quality and NVH while having better crash ratings compared to the previous models but it is heavier. The 5th gen cars are also larger too and the Cd is no better so they have more aero drag as well. If you have ever seen a 5th Gen next to any of the earlier generation Camaros it is pretty amazing to see how much bigger they are.
We have done some work to reduce the weight of the vehicle (race seat, V6 brakes, etc.) but then we have added weight back in to the vehicle with a roll cage, supercharger, dry sump tank, intercooler water tank, two nitrous bottles, chassis stiffening, 9.5" differential etc.
I am sure we would run quicker ET's with a turbo 400. Despite the power losses to the turbo 400, we might gain MPH too since we are loosing at least 1 mph on each shift and that wouldn't happen on an automatic since you don't stop accelerating during the shift on an automatic.
The 5th Gen Camaro has a much stiffer chassis and much better ride quality and NVH while having better crash ratings compared to the previous models but it is heavier. The 5th gen cars are also larger too and the Cd is no better so they have more aero drag as well. If you have ever seen a 5th Gen next to any of the earlier generation Camaros it is pretty amazing to see how much bigger they are.
We have done some work to reduce the weight of the vehicle (race seat, V6 brakes, etc.) but then we have added weight back in to the vehicle with a roll cage, supercharger, dry sump tank, intercooler water tank, two nitrous bottles, chassis stiffening, 9.5" differential etc.
I am sure we would run quicker ET's with a turbo 400. Despite the power losses to the turbo 400, we might gain MPH too since we are loosing at least 1 mph on each shift and that wouldn't happen on an automatic since you don't stop accelerating during the shift on an automatic.
11-25-2010, 09:02 PM
#9
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
LPE Camaro SS diff and drag I don't have information comparing the G8 and 2010 Camaro drag coefficient or cross sectional area. The cross section is probably fairly similar. The numbers I have seen for the Camaro are 0.35 to 0.37.
No, we don't have a solid Dana 60. It is a 9.5" (241 mm) independent rear. It is a custom differential. The one in our car is a prototype billet aluminum CNC machined case but cast aluminum cases are being made and should be available soon. The ring gears are the same size as the 9.5" CK truck differentials.
No, we don't have a solid Dana 60. It is a 9.5" (241 mm) independent rear. It is a custom differential. The one in our car is a prototype billet aluminum CNC machined case but cast aluminum cases are being made and should be available soon. The ring gears are the same size as the 9.5" CK truck differentials.
