2010 Camaro SS - Heads/cam results... So far
05-31-2015, 08:23 PM
#1
2010 Camaro SS - Heads/cam results... So far 2010 Camaro SS M6
Stock bottom end
AI 280cc Heads
vengeance racing turbo cam (235/231 .6xx/.6xx 115lsa)
.660 springs/pushrods/trunion upgrade
SLP under drive pulley
CAI CAI
Ebay 1 3/4" LT's
No cats
borla ATAK 2.5" exhaust
Tune via hptuners (me tuning)
Stock intake and stock TB
458rwhp/423rwtq ... I am going to do some more fine tuning.
Stock bottom end
AI 280cc Heads
vengeance racing turbo cam (235/231 .6xx/.6xx 115lsa)
.660 springs/pushrods/trunion upgrade
SLP under drive pulley
CAI CAI
Ebay 1 3/4" LT's
No cats
borla ATAK 2.5" exhaust
Tune via hptuners (me tuning)
Stock intake and stock TB
458rwhp/423rwtq ... I am going to do some more fine tuning.
11-12-2015, 12:33 AM
#6
Keep the thread updated to see what gains there are with the nick Williams and the radical ported intake. Been meaning to do this to my ls3 Vette but wasn't sure if there would be midrange gains.
11-12-2015, 09:44 AM
#7
Unfortunately they didnt have my old run saved (so it could not be overlaid), but in the end I gained 3rwhp and lost 2rwtq peak. My WB wasnt matching up to theirs, so I eyeballed their numbers on the screen and tried to adjust my tune accordingly (hence why AFR was not a straight line). In the end I made 21 pulls ranging from 10.8AFR to 13.8AFR (seemed to like between 12.0-12.5AFR) and I tweaked timing from 17 degrees up to 25 degrees during tuning, I think it settled on 22 degrees if I recall.
Car made 458rwhp/423rwtq before the addition of the Peak Speed Radical 102 Intake and NW102 TB. After those two mods, new numbers were 461rwhp/421rwtq. Intake and TB didnt do anything for me, which leads me to believe they werent a restriction for me. I think the setup is just done in N/A form... big heads, turbo cam, small exhaust... i think it is just where it is.
A little disappointed as I wanted to hit 480rwhp... but the plan was always to turbo the car, and atleast I have a baseline before the turbo goes on this winter (Huron Speed/Precision 7675).
Car made 458rwhp/423rwtq before the addition of the Peak Speed Radical 102 Intake and NW102 TB. After those two mods, new numbers were 461rwhp/421rwtq. Intake and TB didnt do anything for me, which leads me to believe they werent a restriction for me. I think the setup is just done in N/A form... big heads, turbo cam, small exhaust... i think it is just where it is.
A little disappointed as I wanted to hit 480rwhp... but the plan was always to turbo the car, and atleast I have a baseline before the turbo goes on this winter (Huron Speed/Precision 7675).
Last edited by RealQuick; 11-12-2015 at 10:48 AM.
Trending Topics
04-06-2016, 10:25 AM
#10
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe the exhaust is hurting. I would think a 6 speed car with heads, cam, intake, exhaust would make a little more than 458. Still pretty good power but just seems like it should be closer to 480 ish.
agree. 
06-22-2016, 07:30 AM
#13
i'd imagine with the snail it should be somewhere in the 730 range considering H/I/C
jon...wanna say you should see a considerable jump in power from that 1 3/4 to 1 7/8 just with bolt ons and cam only i did 465 tire on a HOT florida day...how you liking the TQ curve with the turbo on her?
jon...wanna say you should see a considerable jump in power from that 1 3/4 to 1 7/8 just with bolt ons and cam only i did 465 tire on a HOT florida day...how you liking the TQ curve with the turbo on her?
09-11-2016, 07:30 AM
#18
Dyno got shifted to yesterday. results:
Had an issue on the dyno with Ecu, bounced in and out of limp mode and was getting the p0606 code).
Called it quits at 608rwhp@10psi. Didn't want move timing up since I was getting this issue. I'll have to figure out the issue and go back.
Figured I would just post an update.
Had an issue on the dyno with Ecu, bounced in and out of limp mode and was getting the p0606 code).
Called it quits at 608rwhp@10psi. Didn't want move timing up since I was getting this issue. I'll have to figure out the issue and go back.
Figured I would just post an update.