Go Back   LS1TECH > Gen 5 Camaro 2010+ Forum > Gen 5 Racing Tech
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

Gen 5 Racing Tech
Heads, cam, valvetrain, short block discussion
Sponsored by
School of Automotive Machinists
Click Here

View Poll Results: Twin Turbo V6 Camaro
Hell freaking yeah! 80 54.05%
No, V8 or bust. 68 45.95%
Voters: 148. You may not vote on this poll

Twin Turbo V6 Camaro?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-16-2009, 03:47 PM   #1
Teching In
 
AlphaJaguar5's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5
Send a message via AIM to AlphaJaguar5
Default Twin Turbo V6 Camaro?

What do you guys think if a company like a Full Race or Garrett offered a twin turbo kit for the V6 Camaro as a bolt on upgrade for a lot less than the difference of an SS Camaro. Would you pick it over the SS Camaro?

I'm asking because I know a lot of people my age can't afford an SS Camaro even though they'd love one. This route gives them SS power but for a lot less $$$. You would be able to have a Camaro and still surprise the crap out of people by taking it to them with SS power in a V6.

Thoughts. Opinions.
__________________
I'm just lost on my way to the Redline Forums please don't hurt me
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...ar5/sigpic.jpg
HPTuners, Diamond Forged 10.0:1 Pistons, ARP Studs, Ferrea Dual Coil Valve Springs, Flowtechnics Ported Head, Siemens 60lbers, AEM Short Ram, Magnaflow Cat Back, GMPP Header, BilletFlow 2.9" Pulley, Cobra Heat Exchanger, ZZP Downpipe, Bwoody Supercooler & Intercooler Resivour, A Plethora of stickers
Special Thanks to all the guys down at Vera
Vids of the Beast
AlphaJaguar5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 04:24 PM   #2
TECH Veteran
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 4,542
Default

Consider a few things here.
How much weight would the kit add (at least 200lbs).
Can the stock V6 drive train take the increased torque?
Is the few thousand dollars in difference between the installed and tuned TT V6 Camaro with no warrenty now worth it over a warrantied V8 Camaro that also comes with better suspension, brakes and a beefier drive train?
__________________
'01 WS6 M6
JD_AMG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 04:25 PM   #3
TECH Regular
 
Sammyboy's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 9
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: knoxville, TN
Posts: 426
Default

warranty would be the difference maker
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PewterY2KZ28 View Post
Talk about a resurection....!! Nice job buddy.. Car looks great!
Sammyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 05:51 PM   #4
TECH Junkie
 
WECIV's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gulf Shores and DC
Posts: 3,885
Default

The issues with most of us is...we like V8s this is why we get muscle cars. There are plenty of options out there such as you discuss in other vehicles. Though I am sure some folks would buy it.

W
__________________
Vote for McCain in 2008!!!

02 Z28 A4 (2.73's) TTop
03 Stang GT M5 Coupe
79 Z28 A3 TTop Sold
84 5.0 GT M5 Vert Sold
My Fast loves LS series engines!!!
WECIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 06:15 PM   #5
TECH Fanatic
 
jmurray87's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,894
Send a message via AIM to jmurray87
Default

I would do it, just to be different.....if the 3.8 in the 4th gens can be made into a dam good performer then I know for sure the new V6 in the 5th gen will be that much better. But I want a V8 SS as well....so maybe both? haha
__________________

2000 Camaro Z28 - TSP Rumbler, BBK LT Headers & ORY Pipe, SLP Lid, Some suspension stuff - Sold
2004 Pontiac GTO - YJ/A4/SAP Package, Spintech Exhaust
2011 Mustang 5.0
jmurray87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 07:40 PM   #6
TECH Enthusiast
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 598
Send a message via AIM to hc8719
Default

If GM was thinking about a production V6 TT, I would deffinately consider it. I know Ford was/is talking about a V6 TT that would outperform the V8, while also offering better fuel economy.

I know a lot of us love our V8's. V8's and muscle cars go together like milk and cookies. Except for the past ten or so years, V6's have generally been lackluster, this has changed dramatically.

If a V6 TT Camaro offers better MPGs to meet CAFE standards, or makes the Camaro a better seller, I'm for it.

There have been some exceptional (non-ricey) V6s, both naturally aspirated and forced induction (a few 4 bangers too). I wouldn't overlook a great performer, just because it wasn't a V8
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greggy
Geeze, It's a FIREBIRD people. They are all Firebird's unless it's a Camaro. The rest is just is the package name... Formula, Trans AM, Firehawk, WS6 or whatever.

If you don't like to refer to your car as a FIREBIRD then you are in DENIAL.
-------------------------------
2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GT2
hc8719 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 09:39 PM   #7
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Default

I think 11.3 compression you might have some issues.
karst#9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 09:57 PM   #8
Teching In
 
atexasguy18's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 14
Default

I'd like to see what the v6 can do

I bet it gets pretty good gas milage
__________________
Turbo F150 13psi, 98 SLP Camaro
atexasguy18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 11:12 PM   #9
TECH Junkie
 
WECIV's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gulf Shores and DC
Posts: 3,885
Default

I think the current V6 will suffice...but I would like to see what could be done with the ecotec I4 in future upgrades.

W
__________________
Vote for McCain in 2008!!!

02 Z28 A4 (2.73's) TTop
03 Stang GT M5 Coupe
79 Z28 A3 TTop Sold
84 5.0 GT M5 Vert Sold
My Fast loves LS series engines!!!
WECIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 03:06 AM   #10
TECH Enthusiast
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 510
Default

duratecs love boost noble m12 dumdumdum

im sober
88blackgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 07:27 PM   #11
TECH Enthusiast
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 700
Default

Looks like Ford might be putting the ecoboost Mustang on the backburner. So unless something really good or really bad happens with new Camaro sales, I'm not sure I see any motivation for GM to do a TT model.
ThisBlood147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 08:56 PM   #12
TECH Addict
 
samson_420's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Narnia
Posts: 2,340
Default

Cool idea in a way. . . . But, it is a fact Camaro owners love v8's, including me.


There is absolutely nothing wrong with a TT settup on any car, but it just does not scream GM muscle. . . . My 2 Cents.
__________________
http://ls1tech.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=107202&dateline=13409  43895
samson_420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 09:06 PM   #13
TECH Regular
 
Sammyboy's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 9
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: knoxville, TN
Posts: 426
Default

Yup.....we (borgwarner) are working on twin turbo"ing" the 3.5........(V6 mustang)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PewterY2KZ28 View Post
Talk about a resurection....!! Nice job buddy.. Car looks great!
Sammyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 10:47 AM   #14
TECH Fanatic
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,060
Default

It'd be cool to see. I'd rather have a V8 version but if I ever wound up with a beater 6 cylinder camaro at least there'd be an option for power down the line. (everyone knows they mod the beater too!!)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponygt65 View Post
Rollin' in G-T-O slouchin' like a master G homey in LAS VEGAS!!!...Woop Woop.

Summerwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 02:31 PM   #15
TECH Addict
 
Z28Venom's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 13
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USN, Haze Grey and Underway
Posts: 2,900
Default

Anything with a turbo would peak my interest.
__________________
2008 Sierra Crew Cab
5.3L
Z28Venom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 08:59 PM   #16
TECH Enthusiast
 
kain01's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 687
Default

The V6 is perfectly capable, there have been at least two concepts released with a twin turbo setup for Buick. The Centieme:

http://www.motortrend.com/future/con...eme/index.html

and the Velite:

http://www.motortrend.com/future/con...ite/index.html

They both push 400 horsepower but seeing how neither of these had vvt or direct injection I'm betting 500 could be easily had out of it.
__________________
1998 Z28 Arctic White A4 3.23 - Stock LS1 R.I.P. 11/18/2010
kain01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 12:09 PM   #17
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samson_420 View Post
Cool idea in a way. . . . But, it is a fact Camaro owners love v8's, including me.


There is absolutely nothing wrong with a TT settup on any car, but it just does not scream GM muscle. . . . My 2 Cents.
I'd think muscle cars will always have V8s. I think in the future GM may go with a small displacement V8 (<244ci) with a light pressure turbo. I think ppl are missing the fact that GM pulls exceptional fuel economy out of what are really big engines in the LS3 and LS7.
Can-Am is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 11:06 PM   #18
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kain01 View Post
The V6 is perfectly capable, there have been at least two concepts released with a twin turbo setup for Buick. The Centieme:

http://www.motortrend.com/future/con...eme/index.html

and the Velite:

http://www.motortrend.com/future/con...ite/index.html

They both push 400 horsepower but seeing how neither of these had vvt or direct injection I'm betting 500 could be easily had out of it.
How much boost are these running?
karst#9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 09:20 AM   #19
TECH Enthusiast
 
kain01's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 687
Default

Doesn't say, if I had to guess I'd say 9 -12. This was meant for production so it wouldn't have been a whole lot.
__________________
1998 Z28 Arctic White A4 3.23 - Stock LS1 R.I.P. 11/18/2010
kain01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 08:15 PM   #20
Launching!
 
mj114679's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Waco, Tx/ Houston, Tx
Posts: 199
Default

well if they mad a kit for it that would be cool cause insurance would be cheaper.. right?
__________________
1995 Z28 LT1| Built 4L60e| Small Vette stall| Transgo Stage 2 Shift kit| A/C Delete... Thanks guys lol| Flowmaster Cat-Back| Cut-out| !Cat| SS Spoiler| K&N CAI| 2000 SS Interior Swap|
Btw come visit other F-body guys at Puredominance.net!!!!
mj114679 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 08:15 PM
LS1Tech
Pontiac Firebird




Paid Advertisement
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My somewhat coherent thread on the topic of street/strip turbo LS combinations. INTMD8 Forced Induction 124 10-09-2012 09:23 PM
Garrett TV7512 Camaro Chris Forced Induction 2 09-02-2011 03:16 AM
Any feedback on TiAL SS Garrett Housings? Rick_Vor Forced Induction 6 01-08-2010 09:10 PM
budget twin turbo 6.0 questions ADAM1967 Forced Induction 7 07-29-2009 12:04 AM
Master power turbos any good? rayanb Forced Induction 3 07-09-2005 02:06 AM


Tags
2001, 2010, 36, 38, bolt, camaro, gm, ideas, kit, llt, make, tuning, turbo, twin, v6


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Join Ls1Tech

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - JOBS
Emails & Contact Details