Gen 5 Racing Tech Heads, cam, valvetrain, short block discussion

GM's Camaro Business Case - 100,000 Must Be Sold Per Year

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2006, 01:33 AM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Exclamation GM's Camaro Business Case - 100,000 Must Be Sold Per Year

Lutz says GM must reach sales goal if concept is built



By JAMIE LAREAU | AUTOMOTIVE NEWS
Published 05/15/06, 2:59 am et

DETROIT -- Product chief Robert Lutz thinks General Motors can sell more than 100,000 units of the Chevrolet Camaro -- and says that's the number required for GM to build a production version of the concept unveiled at the Detroit auto show.

GM is doing "intense work" on engineering for a production version and analyzing the business case, Lutz, GM's vice chairman and global vice president of product development, said in an interview with Automotive News.

He added: "Is it an approved program? No."

In January, Lutz said he expected a decision on building the sporty coupe within six months. GM executives have strongly hinted they will build the Camaro.

Lutz says GM wouldn't consider building the car unless it could sell more than 100,000 a year. He says the Camaro, a car he describes as "a little bit off to the side" of mainstream segments, would draw new customers and promote GM's product quality.

The Camaro would be aimed at the Ford Mustang, which sold 160,975 units in the United States last year. In the peak years of muscle-car coupes, the Camaro sold 200,000-plus units.

The Camaro would be part of GM's coming lineup of midpriced to premium-priced cars on a new rear-drive architecture developed by Holden for the next Commodore. North American production of those vehicles is expected in 2008 or 2009.

Old 05-16-2006, 02:21 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
DesertFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

didnt the early years of the ls1 4th gens sell 100k units (all models)? add the pontiac share that would be included with that, and I think they have a good chance of reaching that goal.

Josh
Old 05-16-2006, 03:46 AM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
 
WECIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gulf Shores and DC
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am sick and tired of their games. **** GM. I am sick of them. Build the damn car or do not. Just inform us if you wish to have our business or if you wish for us to go elsewhere. I hate this crap!!!

W
Old 05-16-2006, 04:59 AM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ford sold 161,000 Mustangs last year under just one brand, their own. Ford also created, and now owns the pony car market.

Can GM really conquest 100,000 Mustang lookers, or is the niche much bigger and just waiting for a Mustang alternative?

In any case, I don't think the Camaro can reach the mark GM is setting. But it can probably get close if it comes out faithful to the concept.
Old 05-16-2006, 05:36 AM
  #5  
Deranged Rat Fink
iTrader: (3)
 
badjuju342's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Right here at my laptop, DUH!
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Here's a thought: If they want to sell that many , it probably help if they actually did TV commercials for it. What a grand idea: Using TV to ADVERTISE something besides the latest-crossover-econo-minivan-SUV!
Old 05-16-2006, 10:41 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
abadss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home of #3, NC
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i can see them hitting this mark for the first year of production when the design is new and the hype is at its max. but they will have to continue to advertise it and bring back those loyal GM costumers from the ford and chysler camps. they need to make sure the car performs better than the mustang and challenger, for a better price. dont repeat the same advertising death they commited with the 4th gen
Old 05-16-2006, 11:22 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (39)
 
98redM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central Cal - Merced County
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah, I never saw an advertisement for the 4th gen camaro, not even when they were being cut. I do remember the trans am commercials though; those were pretty sweet.
Old 05-16-2006, 11:32 AM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
OctaneZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Holland, IL
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

In 2002, on a 25-year-old chassis and a 10-year-old design, they sold 70K F-Bodies.

100K 5th Gens per year is definitely realistic.
Old 05-16-2006, 01:24 PM
  #9  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
maddboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 4,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I dont see it being a problem as long as they make good V6 car to compete with the Mustang. The strong V6 market it what allows the Mustang to survive.
Old 05-16-2006, 06:00 PM
  #10  
Launching!
 
Switchblade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Windsor, Ont
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Hmmm, 100,000 a year? Back about 20 years ago this wouldn't be a problem. However in today's marketplace 100000/yr are usually reserved for vehicles like minivans, suv's, and sedans - vehicles that are considered daily drivers. Unfortunately the camaro doesn't fit into that category regardless if its equipped with V6 or V8 powerplants.

If GM's really serious about building the camaro, then they should start at around 50000 a year and gradually adjust to market demand. Keep in mind the Camaro will be facing stiff competition from the Mustang and the new Challenger, and the Pontiac GTO. If demand on the Camaro increases (hopefully) then GM will be in a position to allocate more production volume for this car. It's easier and inexpensive to add production volume, then it is to take it away. If GM plays their cards right and the 5th Gen sells well, then that momentum can carry over into the development and launch of the 6th Gen F-body. GM shouldn't try and get everything in one shot with the 5th Gen Camaro - just build on the momentum for future generations.
Old 05-16-2006, 07:56 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
OctaneZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Holland, IL
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Challenger and GTO are in a different class and will not be directly competing with Camaro and Mustang.
Also, both GTO and Challenger will be maxed out at about 25K units per year each, designed to be limited production.

That said, they're still all coupes.

But 100K is definitely not unreasonable.

4th Gen F-Body numbers:
1993: 39,103 Camaros + 14,112 Firebirds = 53,215 Total*
1994: 119,799 Camaros + 45,992 Firebirds = 165,791 Total
1995: 122,738 Camaros + 50,986 Firebirds = 173,724 Total
1996: 61,362 Camaros + 30,097 Firebirds = 91,459 Total
1997: 60,202 Camaros + 30,754 Firebirds = 90,956 Total
1998: 54,026 Camaros + 32,155 Firebirds = 86,181 Total
1999: 42,098 Camaros + 32,209 Firebirds = 74,307 Total
2000: 45,461 Camaros + 31,826 Firebirds = 77,287 Total
2001: 29,009 Camaros + 21,436 Firebirds = 50,445 Total*
2002: 41,776 Camaros + 30,691 Firebirds = 72,467 Total

* - Short model year runs. 1993 late start, 2001 early end.

Looking at those numbers, I'd say 100K for the 5th Gen will be a cinch.
Old 05-16-2006, 08:18 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
 
LS1obsession's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OctaneZ28
Challenger and GTO are in a different class and will not be directly competing with Camaro and Mustang.
Also, both GTO and Challenger will be maxed out at about 25K units per year each, designed to be limited production.

That said, they're still all coupes.

But 100K is definitely not unreasonable.

4th Gen F-Body numbers:
1993: 39,103 Camaros + 14,112 Firebirds = 53,215 Total*
1994: 119,799 Camaros + 45,992 Firebirds = 165,791 Total
1995: 122,738 Camaros + 50,986 Firebirds = 173,724 Total
1996: 61,362 Camaros + 30,097 Firebirds = 91,459 Total
1997: 60,202 Camaros + 30,754 Firebirds = 90,956 Total
1998: 54,026 Camaros + 32,155 Firebirds = 86,181 Total
1999: 42,098 Camaros + 32,209 Firebirds = 74,307 Total
2000: 45,461 Camaros + 31,826 Firebirds = 77,287 Total
2001: 29,009 Camaros + 21,436 Firebirds = 50,445 Total*
2002: 41,776 Camaros + 30,691 Firebirds = 72,467 Total

* - Short model year runs. 1993 late start, 2001 early end.

Looking at those numbers, I'd say 100K for the 5th Gen will be a cinch.

Keep in mind that there will be no Firebird to contribute to the 100,000 mark. Looking at the above numbers with this is mind, I don't think it will happen. Also, when they discontinued the f-body, many potential f-body buyers who have wanted a "New" muscle car in the past few years have probably settled for the Mustang or the GTO;believing there would be no return. As result, when the new Camaro comes out, guess what is sitting in their garage?
The new Camaro would have to be one hell of a machine (no doubt in my mind that is has the potential) to get back those lost potential buyers, and attract new ones. Will GM do be able to do it? Those numbers reflect sales when it was not in the financial **** hole it is today. Many people have lost faith in GM. They also have new competition besides the Mustang- the Dodge Charger. I don't think it will happen.
Old 05-16-2006, 10:03 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
2K2WS6TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ark City KS
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

FWIW if the V6 model is marketed correctly, and it appeals to the target audience (women) it should be not much of a problem to sell 100k units.
What do you think keeps the Mustang GT (and the other performance editions) going, yep the lowly V6 model, sells like hotcakes to those who like the styling, but for whatever reason don't want the V8
GM needs to make sure the V6 Camaro is not a stripped down basic rental car style, but a full fledged car with most, if not all, the options that are available on the V8 models available on the 6, all the handling, the creature comforts, etc
Old 05-16-2006, 11:06 PM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't see it happening. That's a lot of Camaro's to sell for one year. Plus do you really want GM to sell that many? IMO it will just water down the name. I think they realistically should aim for 50,000 per year.
Old 05-16-2006, 11:10 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
 
WECIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gulf Shores and DC
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If the car were light enough that they could make a 15 thousand dollar four cylinder...
Old 05-17-2006, 05:58 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
 
Pontiacdreamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WECIV
If the car were light enough that they could make a 15 thousand dollar four cylinder...
Im glad you said it first. hello RWD import fighter.
Old 05-17-2006, 06:43 PM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

GM, Chevrolet. Journalists were given yet another preview of the Camaro concept this week, but GM would not confirm that the project is a "go." We can confirm, however, that the make-or-break business case for the new Camaro won't be the 400HP V-8, six-speed version, because GM can do that car in its sleep and make it great - and that package is as close to being a "no-brainer" as you can possibly get. The real issue is the V-6 version, a car that must be worthy of the Camaro nameplate, first of all, and be premium in every respect - while delivering an outstanding performance/value equation vis-a-vis the competition. This is the car that GM must get right if the Camaro is going to be a success in the market. We'll stick by what we said immediately after the Detroit auto show, however: The Camaro is a done deal - GM is just making sure that it's every bit as good as people want it to be. And we'll probably get official confirmation of its production timetable by the fall.

Old 05-17-2006, 07:01 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NHRAMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver,[KITSILANO].B.C. Canada *WestCoast*
Posts: 8,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Mark my words..if it is built--it will be discontinued within 3 years...I have spoken......
Old 05-17-2006, 07:53 PM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Wnts2Go10O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well so much for seeing the camaro again.. theres no way in hell they will sell 100,000 units and lutz knows this...its called an excuse.
Old 05-17-2006, 10:23 PM
  #20  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Chris95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrkPhx
I don't see it happening. That's a lot of Camaro's to sell for one year. Plus do you really want GM to sell that many? IMO it will just water down the name. I think they realistically should aim for 50,000 per year.
what are you talking about? 100k is very doable, fwiw did the 4th gens selling over 100k a year water down the name we all loveth? imagine about every 1 in 100 people in los angeles county having a camaro the first year, no other new camaros anywhere else. that's a representation of 100k units per year the first year. i think nationally it is doable.


Quick Reply: GM's Camaro Business Case - 100,000 Must Be Sold Per Year



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 PM.