GM why not a DOHC LS motor?
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
GM why not a DOHC LS motor?
Just throwing the idea out there for a discussion. I've had this discussion with some gear head friends, I think all engines today should be dual overhead cam. The only downside I can see to a DOHC motor is the timing belt. Other then that they are far less complicated, rev better, make more power etc.. I think it would be pretty sweet to have a LS DOHC motor.Why not GM? Or am I missing some good reasons there not used?
Only V8 DOHC motor GM made that I've seen is the Northstar and that think from what I gather reading wiki was junk.
Only V8 DOHC motor GM made that I've seen is the Northstar and that think from what I gather reading wiki was junk.
#4
It'd be more complicated with 4 cams and a lot more expensive. DOHC engines have a higher rev limit with creates more wear on the engine. I'd rather stick to a SOHC engine that doesn't struggle to make its power. I'm no expert on engines that's my opinion. I just sold my '96 Cobra because I was concerned about reliability issues. Apparently DOHC Cobra engines last a maximum of approximately 150K miles and I've seen a few LS1s on here that are going upwards of 200K miles.
#5
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
All engine designs are a compromise based on what the priority is.
Ultimate performance would require 4 valves/cyl.
But the highest piorities in the LS1 design was high performance at low cost. That means 1 cam in the block.
And isn't that really the reason we love them so much?
Ultimate performance would require 4 valves/cyl.
But the highest piorities in the LS1 design was high performance at low cost. That means 1 cam in the block.
And isn't that really the reason we love them so much?
#6
correct me if im wrong but a DOHC engine wouldnt be a LS engine. an ls engine IS a pushrod v8.. And i believe the LT5 was DOHC so its not just the northstar. correct me if im wrong
#7
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,484 Likes
on
1,068 Posts
I would be very disappointed to see a DOHC replace the LSx series of engines.
Single cam/pushrod is simple and cost effective. Stick with what works, IMO. GM has been kicking *** with pushrods for YEARS while Ford was struggling to stay within 100hp of the NA GM V8 competition.
Single cam/pushrod is simple and cost effective. Stick with what works, IMO. GM has been kicking *** with pushrods for YEARS while Ford was struggling to stay within 100hp of the NA GM V8 competition.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Senior Member
Just throwing the idea out there for a discussion. I've had this discussion with some gear head friends, I think all engines today should be dual overhead cam. The only downside I can see to a DOHC motor is the timing belt. Other then that they are far less complicated, rev better, make more power etc..
Similar thread:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/advanced-...8-4-valve.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/13401768-post55.html
Summary: DOHC engines are heavier, bigger, more expensive and don't make any more power.
#10
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
OHC was invented before OHV to begin with. It offers better port/valve spacing and ability to phase cams independently, and less worry of valvetrain harmonics. As far as less complicated? Not likely. Have you ever disassembled a DOHC motor? Just because it doesn't have long pushrods doesn't mean it is any less complicated to deal with. Basically you just eliminate the pushrod and manipulate the rocker with the lifter, or some kind of follower.
EDIT: nice ninja edit there, you realized that DOHC does not mean your cam moves the valve by itself necessarily.
EDIT: nice ninja edit there, you realized that DOHC does not mean your cam moves the valve by itself necessarily.
Last edited by Arc00TA; 07-28-2010 at 11:15 PM.
#11
Teching In
Thread Starter
Hmm, cool. That's why I bought it up, learned something... I always figured they were less complicated since the valves rode directly on the cams but that pic says a lot.
#16
nope, there is now a dohc 302.. and someone correct me if i'm wrong but isnt there a 330ci dohc also