General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

GM why not a DOHC LS motor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2010, 09:44 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
brian.moritz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default GM why not a DOHC LS motor?

Just throwing the idea out there for a discussion. I've had this discussion with some gear head friends, I think all engines today should be dual overhead cam. The only downside I can see to a DOHC motor is the timing belt. Other then that they are far less complicated, rev better, make more power etc.. I think it would be pretty sweet to have a LS DOHC motor.Why not GM? Or am I missing some good reasons there not used?

Only V8 DOHC motor GM made that I've seen is the Northstar and that think from what I gather reading wiki was junk.
brian.moritz is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 09:56 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Z28_LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't wanna pay for that many cams when I mod a motor....
Z28_LT1 is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 10:01 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Latch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by brian.moritz
Only V8 DOHC motor GM made that I've seen is the Northstar and that think from what I gather reading wiki was junk.
Exactly. GM knows how to do something well and that's make pushrod V8s. It's a perfectly fine design that keeps the cost down as well as keeps the size and weight of the motor down.
Latch is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 10:06 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
AgentLS1Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It'd be more complicated with 4 cams and a lot more expensive. DOHC engines have a higher rev limit with creates more wear on the engine. I'd rather stick to a SOHC engine that doesn't struggle to make its power. I'm no expert on engines that's my opinion. I just sold my '96 Cobra because I was concerned about reliability issues. Apparently DOHC Cobra engines last a maximum of approximately 150K miles and I've seen a few LS1s on here that are going upwards of 200K miles.
AgentLS1Z is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 10:17 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
eseibel67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

All engine designs are a compromise based on what the priority is.

Ultimate performance would require 4 valves/cyl.

But the highest piorities in the LS1 design was high performance at low cost. That means 1 cam in the block.

And isn't that really the reason we love them so much?
eseibel67 is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 10:20 PM
  #6  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
cad2k3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

correct me if im wrong but a DOHC engine wouldnt be a LS engine. an ls engine IS a pushrod v8.. And i believe the LT5 was DOHC so its not just the northstar. correct me if im wrong
cad2k3 is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 10:23 PM
  #7  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,484 Likes on 1,068 Posts

Default

I would be very disappointed to see a DOHC replace the LSx series of engines.

Single cam/pushrod is simple and cost effective. Stick with what works, IMO. GM has been kicking *** with pushrods for YEARS while Ford was struggling to stay within 100hp of the NA GM V8 competition.
RPM WS6 is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 10:29 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
 
AgentLS1Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep, plus less parts to break and less issues to deal with in general than a DOHC engine.
AgentLS1Z is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 10:54 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,803
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by brian.moritz
Just throwing the idea out there for a discussion. I've had this discussion with some gear head friends, I think all engines today should be dual overhead cam. The only downside I can see to a DOHC motor is the timing belt. Other then that they are far less complicated, rev better, make more power etc..
They are far MORE complicated, not less.
Similar thread:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/advanced-...8-4-valve.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/13401768-post55.html
Summary: DOHC engines are heavier, bigger, more expensive and don't make any more power.
JD_AMG is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 11:06 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Arc00TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The 'Nard
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

OHC was invented before OHV to begin with. It offers better port/valve spacing and ability to phase cams independently, and less worry of valvetrain harmonics. As far as less complicated? Not likely. Have you ever disassembled a DOHC motor? Just because it doesn't have long pushrods doesn't mean it is any less complicated to deal with. Basically you just eliminate the pushrod and manipulate the rocker with the lifter, or some kind of follower.


EDIT: nice ninja edit there, you realized that DOHC does not mean your cam moves the valve by itself necessarily.

Last edited by Arc00TA; 07-28-2010 at 11:15 PM.
Arc00TA is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 11:12 PM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
brian.moritz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hmm, cool. That's why I bought it up, learned something... I always figured they were less complicated since the valves rode directly on the cams but that pic says a lot.
brian.moritz is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 11:18 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Arc00TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The 'Nard
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Valves DO NOT normally ride directly on the cam for car applications (I've seen bikes like this). Normally a follower or lifter is still used to actuate the valve.


Last edited by Arc00TA; 07-28-2010 at 11:25 PM.
Arc00TA is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 11:31 PM
  #13  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Hi Volume's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NoCal
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

its gonna weigh 10,000lbs and add way more complication. I hate those goofy *** ford DOHC engines. 80 extra pounds in cams alone.
Hi Volume is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 11:36 PM
  #14  
Formerly 99-2door-08/30/2010
iTrader: (3)
 
PitchblackC3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Noble, OK
Posts: 171
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

A lot of the advantage of DOHC is negated now that VVT is available on the GENIV engines.
PitchblackC3 is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 11:55 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

whats the highest displacement DOHC ford motor made in a production car? I think there is a reason 03/04s are 281 ci, if it were any bigger the bastard would need a widebody kit.
itsslow98 is offline  
Old 07-29-2010, 12:06 AM
  #16  
On The Tree
 
93sspcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: georgia
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by itsslow98
whats the highest displacement DOHC ford motor made in a production car? I think there is a reason 03/04s are 281 ci, if it were any bigger the bastard would need a widebody kit.
nope, there is now a dohc 302.. and someone correct me if i'm wrong but isnt there a 330ci dohc also
93sspcoupe is offline  
Old 07-29-2010, 12:11 AM
  #17  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
devonsZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this is what i got out of that question, why doesnt gm rename the camaro to mustang
devonsZ28 is offline  
Old 07-29-2010, 12:22 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Arc00TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The 'Nard
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Theres some 5.8L stroker mod motors with DOHC 32v heads running around. Stroked 5.4's. I'm sure they could be made bigger than that as well.
Arc00TA is offline  
Old 07-29-2010, 12:28 AM
  #19  
On The Tree
 
93sspcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: georgia
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the 5.8 is the ford pushrod 351 not a modmotor. biggest stock modmotor i have seen is the 5.4.
93sspcoupe is offline  
Old 07-29-2010, 12:44 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Arc00TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The 'Nard
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 93sspcoupe
the 5.8 is the ford pushrod 351 not a modmotor. biggest stock modmotor i have seen is the 5.4.
You're right stock 5.4L is the biggest. I have seen 5.8 mod motors but it is a stroker like I said, they built one out of a 5.4 ford GT block in engine masters magazine a while back, and I have seen a few around but not many.
Arc00TA is offline  


Quick Reply: GM why not a DOHC LS motor?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 PM.