***2006 GTO or 2001 Camaro SS.***
#1
***2006 GTO or 2001 Camaro SS.***
Could use some opinions here. Online i found a very nice '06 GTO A4 and a
'01 Camaro SS A4....Looking for opinions on which car would handle, stop, and accelerate quicker in 1/4 mile and be faster on the street.
Which car would most rather to have when it comes to modding. Will a GTO out handle and accelerate on the street and at Atco over the SS Camaro.
I appreciate any opinions. Can use some input.
Thanks all.
Den M.
'01 Camaro SS A4....Looking for opinions on which car would handle, stop, and accelerate quicker in 1/4 mile and be faster on the street.
Which car would most rather to have when it comes to modding. Will a GTO out handle and accelerate on the street and at Atco over the SS Camaro.
I appreciate any opinions. Can use some input.
Thanks all.
Den M.
#2
TECH Enthusiast
Camaro pros:
less weight than GTO
Fit wider tire than GTO
Already has LS6 intake
Camaro con:
weak rear axle
GTO pros:
HD A4 than Camaro
Nicer interior, more solid car than Camaro
Already has 243 heads, and 385hp LS6 cam, larger TB
GTO con:
expensive body and interior parts
If track only then Camaro. If also street driving then GTO.
Which one better for stop,accel, and 1/4 depends on your investment.
less weight than GTO
Fit wider tire than GTO
Already has LS6 intake
Camaro con:
weak rear axle
GTO pros:
HD A4 than Camaro
Nicer interior, more solid car than Camaro
Already has 243 heads, and 385hp LS6 cam, larger TB
GTO con:
expensive body and interior parts
If track only then Camaro. If also street driving then GTO.
Which one better for stop,accel, and 1/4 depends on your investment.
Last edited by Felix C; 05-01-2014 at 08:26 AM.
#7
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Freeport
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The GTO will handle better and has a little more "giddy up". The Camaro is tried and true and easier on the budget all the way around. Plus the Camaro looks better in my opinion, the GTO looks like a Grand Prix. I've worked on both and the Camaro is more forgiving.
Trending Topics
#8
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My vote goes to the GTO, seems more modern and finished all the way around, maybe more exclusive. Plus it comes with an LS2 being an 06. One thing to consider is that if you are launching the GTO bushing upgrades are needed, unless you like wheel hop.
#10
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Pontiac...mph-Times.html
1999 Pontiac SLP Trans Am Firehawk 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter mile 13.4
2000 Pontiac Trans Am Convertible 0-60 mph 5.4 Quarter mile 13.7
2000 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 0-60 mph 4.9 Quarter mile 13.5
2001 Pontiac SLP Firehawk Anniversary 0-60 mph 4.8 Quarter mile 13.1
2002 Pontiac Firebird (LS1) 0-60 mph 5.0 Quarter Mile 13.3
2004 Pontiac GTO LS1 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter mile 13.6
2004 Lingenfelter Pontiac LPE GTO 0-60 mph 4.3 Quarter Mile 12.5
2005 Pontiac GTO LS2 (Auto) 0-60 mph 4.5 Quarter mile 12.8
2005 Pontiac GTO LS2 (Manual) 0-60 mph 4.6 Quarter mile 12.9
2005 Pontiac GTO V8 (Manual) 0-60 mph 4.7 Quarter mile 13.1
These are magazine times so yes I know they don't represent every driver in every car but they are indicative of the average stock GTO and stock Trans Am/Firebird
#11
TECH Addict
That just means he couldn't drive. I had both cars. As far as working on the gto is easier to work on the motor as far as room. The gto is a better all around car but the Camaro is lighter and you can fit bigger tires. If I was building a drag car I would go with the Camaro. I liked the GTO better as a street car and the GTO interior is way better then the Camaro's. Stock for stock they are very close in the quarter mile.
#12
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,486 Likes
on
1,069 Posts
I'd pick the Camaro for any/all purposes, from racing to daily driving.
The GTO suspension issues and disintegrating seat stitching really dispel the whole "higher quailty car" arguement in my eyes. Both cars have their issues, so you really need to choose based on which one feels/looks better to you. Some people find the F-body more uncomfortable and don't like them for daily driving, though I personally find that they fit me like a glove and never felt any discomfort commuting in them (even on regular 2-4 hour drives).
One point of fact is that GTO platform-specific parts are harder to come by and this trend will continue to worsen as these cars age.
The GTO suspension issues and disintegrating seat stitching really dispel the whole "higher quailty car" arguement in my eyes. Both cars have their issues, so you really need to choose based on which one feels/looks better to you. Some people find the F-body more uncomfortable and don't like them for daily driving, though I personally find that they fit me like a glove and never felt any discomfort commuting in them (even on regular 2-4 hour drives).
One point of fact is that GTO platform-specific parts are harder to come by and this trend will continue to worsen as these cars age.
#14
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
They are heavy n slow like the 5th gen camaros hell i destroyed m6 ls2 cam n exhaust gto put 5 cars on him from a 40 roll get the 01 ss enough said
There are plenty of "heavy n slow" Camaros and GTOs that would destroy you from any roll or dig, so let's not go out and say that all of them are slow pigs.
#15
TECH Junkie
My vote is the camaro, or better yet a trans am, my vote is on looks alone but you know when there is a f-body coming at ya or in your rear view mirror. They turn heads. I think the gto looks lame
#16
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a 3600 stall, 373 gears, 231/235 617/621 comp cam,ported/milled stock heads, lts x pipe dumps, lid, Hoosiers drag radials and tune. I know they can be fast dont get me wrong but they are heavier than my car so naturally it would take more for them to beat me(most of the time) things happen though and ill be the first to admit if i lost to who ever bc theres always someone faster
#17
I was doing the same thing you are doing a couple months back and I bought a black camaro ss with 43,xxx miles. The interior you don't really pay attention to cause you are looking at the road. I must say there are so many parts for the f-body. I look all the time to try getting used parts so I can save some money and I don't see to many gto parts. I was going to buy the gto over the camaro to I read all the suspension problrms the gto's have.
#18
Douchebag On The Tree
I have a 3600 stall, 373 gears, 231/235 617/621 comp cam,ported/milled stock heads, lts x pipe dumps, lid, Hoosiers drag radials and tune. I know they can be fast dont get me wrong but they are heavier than my car so naturally it would take more for them to beat me(most of the time) things happen though and ill be the first to admit if i lost to who ever bc theres always someone faster
I was doing the same thing you are doing a couple months back and I bought a black camaro ss with 43,xxx miles. The interior you don't really pay attention to cause you are looking at the road. I must say there are so many parts for the f-body. I look all the time to try getting used parts so I can save some money and I don't see to many gto parts. I was going to buy the gto over the camaro to I read all the suspension problrms the gto's have.
OP, just drive both and see which one you like more.
Both can be made to handle well, be great looking/comfortable street cruisers, or be made to run fast 1/4 times.
The GTO will always have a comfort/handling edge with the IRS and newer chassis, but the Fbody will always have a fast 1/4 miles edge simply from the less weight and SRA...though if you aren't shooting for consistent >10s every weekend it's not as big a deal.