General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Im a rookie

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2016, 08:36 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Chucknorris79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Newport News, Virginia
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Im a rookie

I have been looking to do a LS swap for my 81 Malibu and came across a 1999 Tahoe 5.7L with 250,000 miles for 400... Should I buy it? Or not?
Old 10-18-2016, 10:46 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

The 1999 5.7L would be a small block chevy motor, not the 5.3L LS motor. Look for a 2000-2005 Chevy/GMC for the LS based motor.
Old 10-19-2016, 05:04 AM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Chucknorris79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Newport News, Virginia
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks very much Conan!
Old 10-19-2016, 10:13 AM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
cookseyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 926
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

HMMMM I had a 99 black extended cab with a 5.3 ......
Old 10-19-2016, 11:20 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cookseyb
HMMMM I had a 99 black extended cab with a 5.3 ......
I wounder if your 99 was a late production ? I just rebuilt a coworkers 99 chevy suburban with a SBC-5.7L motor.

Either way if the truck has 5.7L its not a LS. The LS truck were either the 5.3L or the 6.0L, they never got the 5.7L from the cars.
Old 10-19-2016, 01:12 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
 
EddieGoesFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Meridian MS
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chucknorris79
I have been looking to do a LS swap for my 81 Malibu and came across a 1999 Tahoe 5.7L with 250,000 miles for 400... Should I buy it? Or not?

Don't do it....it's not the right kind of meat and potatoes that you're wanting.



Eddie
Old 10-19-2016, 02:24 PM
  #7  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cookseyb
HMMMM I had a 99 black extended cab with a 5.3 ......
The trucks started getting the LS engines in 99.
The SUVs didn't get them until 2000.
Old 10-20-2016, 05:35 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
99SSJarhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Deloit IA
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
The trucks started getting the LS engines in 99.
The SUVs didn't get them until 2000.
The LS based 5.3, not 5.7. The 5.7 was a LO5 350 sbc.
Old 10-21-2016, 07:20 AM
  #9  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99SSJarhead
The LS based 5.3, not 5.7. The 5.7 was a LO5 350 sbc.
I was talking about all LS based engines.

Sierra/Silverado started getting them in 99.
Tahoe/Yukon/Suburban started getting them in 2000.

That goes for the 4.8, 5.3, 6.0
Old 10-22-2016, 01:44 PM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Chucknorris79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Newport News, Virginia
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the insight guys! Saved me from wasting all kinds of money.
Old 11-04-2016, 03:39 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
Groundhog whacka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 3/4ton and 1ton trucks of '99 retained the old body style and 5.7.



Quick Reply: Im a rookie



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 AM.