General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

LS1 vs LS2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2007, 04:43 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
02ws677's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LS1 vs LS2

I have a 01 Ws6, that i plan on keeping forever, and my next ride will be a 09 z28/ss what ever is the badest... Lets say they have a ls2,r what ever it will be called when 2009 rolls around making 400 hp, is there much diff than my ws6, i mean i'm hopping there is worlds of diff but i don't see it, I would think 450 would hit the mark, I think a 100 hp upgrade in hp would hit the spot, i can not see em putting no more than 450 for 09, i hope but its a no i'm prety sure........... back to ls1 vs ls2 can u really tell the diff, lets say if u drive a Ws6 r a 06 GT0 r vette
Old 02-04-2007, 07:35 AM
  #2  
'Bird Director
iTrader: (80)
 
y2k_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Central Indiana Honors: 4th grade spelling bee contestant
Posts: 12,824
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Moving to General LSX Automobile Discussion Forum (from Pontiac Firebird Forum)...
Old 02-04-2007, 10:01 AM
  #3  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
kdstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: IA
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02ws677
I have a 01 Ws6, that i plan on keeping forever, and my next ride will be a 09 z28/ss what ever is the badest... Lets say they have a ls2,r what ever it will be called when 2009 rolls around making 400 hp, is there much diff than my ws6, i mean i'm hopping there is worlds of diff but i don't see it, I would think 450 would hit the mark, I think a 100 hp upgrade in hp would hit the spot, i can not see em putting no more than 450 for 09, i hope but its a no i'm prety sure........... back to ls1 vs ls2 can u really tell the diff, lets say if u drive a Ws6 r a 06 GT0 r vette
The weight difference makes the GTO slightly faster, but the GTO doesn't "feel" as fast because it is makes speed with less drama. Kinda like a new mustang compared to a 68 mustang, or even an LT1 compared to an LS1, a lot of people say the LT1 "feels" faster.

The LS2 is a more powerful engine, although I have seen magazine engine dynos putting the LS1 and LS2 very close together in power, but I think the LS1 had less accessories when they dynoed it.

And judging by the general trend, if the 09 Camaro comes with a 400 bhp LS2, the weight will likely keep it from being much faster than an LS1 F-bod, so I wouldn't hold my breath, all they gotta do in the marketplace is beat the mustang, not previous cars.
Old 02-04-2007, 01:42 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
 
The Black Mamba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It'll probably weigh 3900lbs.
Old 02-04-2007, 02:25 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
BriancWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Garage
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Bolt-on/tuned LS1 cars will take one down with equal drivers IMHO.
Old 02-04-2007, 02:47 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
fast01z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calabasas, CA
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

keep i mind the lower cost of bolt ons for the ls1, and the limitations of drive-by-wire versus drive-by-cable. lots of people with LS2s wish they had drive-by-cable, i guess the response feels slightly better.

chances are the 09 camaro will have an ls2, but the vette will probably get an LS3 or something, then theyll waste money redoing the motor mounts on the camaro to put that engine in the '10 camaro. (it loosk wierd to have '10 lol)
Old 02-05-2007, 07:50 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
corvet786c's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Port St. Lucie, Fl
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

IMHO A bolted on LS1 headers/cam etc. With a Good Driver will be able to beat an stock and slightly Modded LS2 Camero/GTO. Weight Ratio to power.The lighter the faster.
Old 02-05-2007, 07:55 AM
  #8  
Launching!
iTrader: (18)
 
tunedportcj5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Switching from a cam only LS1 to a cam only LS2 was a HUGE difference in my car... There is a lot more low end-mid range torque in the LS2.
Old 02-05-2007, 09:01 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My friend owns an 06 GTO and I have an 01 WS6. Both M6. The pissing contest began! (he won due to his wallet. cam/LT's/cat-back/conservative tune =415/389 to the tires and a mid 12@112 without trying too hard. Weighs 36XX on DOT scales. He changed some stuff for SLP stuff. Lost 200#.)

Anyways...my other friend's brother has the same thing, just bone stock. 20-140 he beat a WS6 by 1.5-2 cars. He ran a best of mid 13's@104(Horrid launch, decent shifting when moving). There are 2 local guys in the 12's bone stock. (powershifting like hell).

Every vid my friend with the now cammed GTO sent me had the LS1 car losing by 1-2 cars. Every vid I sent him had the LS1 being =.

The GTO is slightly faster from a roll, slightly slower from a dig (IRS/weight) with all but a GREAT driver.

The LS2 does not have as many QC issues (piston slap, ect) as the LS1. It still can suck oil though. My friend's cammed GTO does not, however.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.