General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Gotta Read This Article!!! Top Speed Reports All Ls1's Have 345hp !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2007, 08:54 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North East Philadelphia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Gotta Read This Article!!! Top Speed Reports All Camaro Ls1's Have 345hp !!!

Now im not agreeing with this article but here it is just found it!

Replacing the LT1 was GM’s all-new LS1, which had been introduced with the fifth-generation Corvette in 1997. It featured the same OHV design, but was cast in aluminum, reducing weight. While the engine had been "detuned" slightly with only single exhaust (which would split into two when it exited the underside of the car) the small number of changes between it and the Corvette version — as well as the real-world performance — make the 305hp rating that GM assigned it in the Z28 a rather conservative estimate. Dyno reports and performance figures support the notion that all LS1 cars, regardless of Chevrolet’s figures put out 345 hp.


The 2001 Z28 and SS models received the intake manifold from the LS6 (the engine used in the fifth-generation Corvette Z06.) Accordingly, the horsepower rating was increased to 310 for the Z28 and 325 for the SS, although both models remained underrated.



http://www.topspeed.com/cars/chevrol...3.html#index_1

I wish this was True!

Last edited by ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS; 06-22-2007 at 09:19 AM. Reason: added info
Old 06-22-2007, 09:19 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
EvoWake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It might not be as true as they claim.. but the ls motors are under-rated
Old 06-22-2007, 09:21 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
thunderstruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: effingham, il
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

its been shown time and time again that ls1 camaro's/birds are underrated at 305 hp
Old 06-22-2007, 09:24 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North East Philadelphia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah i would like to believe that but 345? lol hey i aint complaining but what do you think it really is ? this is what my hunch/guess is ummmmm Z28 is prolly 315-320 and my ss is around 330-340 lol ha i wish! but i dunno prolly underated around 10hp prolly. what do you guys think
Old 06-22-2007, 09:42 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
LS1W66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: St. Clair Shores Mi.
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS
I wish this was True!
It is True
And this has been covered many times before.
In general other than intake and exhaust changes due to packaging constraints all LS1's make approx the same power.
Old 06-22-2007, 09:52 AM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

it IS true...


remember 90% of the car world measures power at the crank.....



we all use rear wheel horsepower here... but outside of "ls1 world" flywheel power is the norm.

our stock cars cranking out 312ish at the rear wheels is 358 if you believe the generic 15% loss rule.. lol..... they are 345ish flywheel hp from the factory.
Old 06-22-2007, 10:10 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (42)
 
slt200mph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: HOT'LANA, GAWJA
Posts: 7,067
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

The info you posted is very very old news sir .. ... But thanks for your effort ... GM has always liked to keep the Corvette owners egos intack so the Corvette motors where always rated higher on paper than the F body ... but I have seen on a number of occasions where a stock Corvette put down 10 less HP than a stock F body car on the same dyno ... of course this caused much dismay to the Corvette owner .. the reason being the independant rear suspension on the Vette eats up more energy getting the HP to the rear wheels than the straight axle on the F body .. 345-350 HP at the crank is a very realistic number for the LS1 motor .. but what you put on the ground is what is most important in the real world ...
Old 06-22-2007, 10:26 AM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North East Philadelphia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

? so this was just posted at LS1.com this can be True?

Its pretty well known that the factory HP ratings are underrated. I have seen bone stock 2002 LS1 dyno at 323 RWHP which equates to around 370 at the motor.
Old 06-22-2007, 10:52 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
lionelc-5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kemah TX
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS
yeah i would like to believe that but 345? lol hey i aint complaining but what do you think it really is ? this is what my hunch/guess is ummmmm Z28 is prolly 315-320 and my ss is around 330-340 lol ha i wish! but i dunno prolly underated around 10hp prolly. what do you guys think

How is your SS any more than your Z28??? It is the same engine............
Old 06-22-2007, 11:26 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Holy 1998, batman!

Yes, its true. And as the other guys said, Intake, exhaust and EGR provisions make for minute variations in power output between the models. That being said, the majority of LS1 powered cars with put down between 300 and 310 RWHP, regardless of the car its in. Thats right in line with 345 crank HP.
Old 06-22-2007, 11:40 AM
  #11  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
King James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS
yeah i would like to believe that but 345? lol hey i aint complaining but what do you think it really is ? this is what my hunch/guess is ummmmm Z28 is prolly 315-320 and my ss is around 330-340 lol ha i wish! but i dunno prolly underated around 10hp prolly. what do you guys think


Weren't you the one in another thread trying to prove how different your precious SS was from a regular Z28?
Old 06-22-2007, 11:44 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North East Philadelphia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ok

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
Holy 1998, batman!

Yes, its true. And as the other guys said, Intake, exhaust and EGR provisions make for minute variations in power output between the models. That being said, the majority of LS1 powered cars with put down between 300 and 310 RWHP, regardless of the car its in. Thats right in line with 345 crank HP.
well i obviously new the ls1 responds well to bolt on s and easy mods, oh ok i understand what everyone means the "engine" itself has 345 hp but its just restricted from the intake and exhaust.
Old 06-22-2007, 11:48 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS
well i obviously new the ls1 responds well to bolt on s and easy mods, oh ok i understand what everyone means the "engine" itself has 345 hp but its just restricted from the intake and exhaust.
Dont forget in order to meet requirements, both exhaust are fairly restrictive. I doubt youd see more than 5 or so HP difference due to exhaust between the z28 and a vette.

Intake and Exhaust are invariably the first place anyone starts modding, so essentially all LS1 hotrodders are starting on an even playing field in terms of HP. Weight and aerodynamics are another matter.
Old 06-22-2007, 11:48 AM
  #14  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North East Philadelphia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

and the article was stating i thought that the camaro z28 as it sat , was perfoming with this 345 withought and mods... thats all i was saying i obviously no the car can have 345 horse with headers,exhasut,inatake,lid there called mods but 345 as it sits stock
Old 06-22-2007, 11:50 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North East Philadelphia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
Dont forget in order to meet requirements, both exhaust are fairly restrictive. I doubt youd see more than 5 or so HP difference due to exhaust between the z28 and a vette.

Intake and Exhaust are invariably the first place anyone starts modding, so essentially all LS1 hotrodders are starting on an even playing field in terms of HP. Weight and aerodynamics are another matter.
ok i gotach i understand. once you start modding the ls1 in anything you on equal playing field but then the aero and weight as well s other factors come into play, yeah they were saying the corvettes rear susp eats alot of hp
Old 06-22-2007, 11:51 AM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS
and the article was stating i thought that the camaro z28 as it sat , was perfoming with this 345 withought and mods... thats all i was saying i obviously no the car can have 345 horse with headers,exhasut,inatake,lid there called mods but 345 as it sits stock
You, sir, are missing the difference between "Crank HP" and "Rear Wheel HP". On an engine dyno the LS1 may make 345 Crank HP. On a chassis dyno, the same motor may put down 305 RWHP. The tranny and drivetrain eats ~15% as a very loose rule of thumb.
Old 06-22-2007, 11:53 AM
  #17  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North East Philadelphia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
You, sir, are missing the difference between "Crank HP" and "Rear Wheel HP". On an engine dyno the LS1 may make 345 Crank HP. On a chassis dyno, the same motor may put down 305 RWHP. The tranny and drivetrain eats ~15% as a very loose rule of thumb.
ok your right i got ahead of myself sorry everyone
Old 06-22-2007, 11:58 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS
ok your right i got ahead of myself sorry everyone
No apology necessary. Its very confusing. Manufacturers rate power at the crank. Most auto enthusiasts refer to RWHP. On this site, many people will simply state HP meaning RWHP.
Old 06-22-2007, 12:01 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North East Philadelphia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
No apology necessary. Its very confusing. Manufacturers rate power at the crank. Most auto enthusiasts refer to RWHP. On this site, many people will simply state HP meaning RWHP.
so what am i kick n at the rear like 290-295
Old 06-22-2007, 12:11 PM
  #20  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,040
Likes: 0
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,073 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ShowtimeSteeleLS1SS
this is what my hunch/guess is ummmmm Z28 is prolly 315-320 and my ss is around 330-340 lol ha i wish!
I hate to break this to you, but your SS doesn't have any more power stock than a Z28 of the same year.

Yes, it's 100 true, SS = Z28 = SS when it come to factory power level. There is no difference in track times or dyno numbers.

The SS package is NOTHING more than appearance and some minor suspension differences. If you bought it because you thought it'd be quicker than a Z28, then you've been fooled by GM marketing.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 AM.