Fast intake combo vs LS2 intake/90mm tb
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fast intake combo vs LS2 intake/90mm tb
im going to be running boost with cathedral ports and was told the Ls2 intake was the best of the Ls2, Ls1, and Ls6. so now im wondering how much of a gain ill pick up by going with a FAST intake combo? any help would be great, thanks
#5
well ive herd the #7 flows more and can burn up that cyclinder and there a 3 piece deal and leak in between them......ive herd of guys running 9s and 8s FI w ls2 and its cheaper
are u running a ls2 on a 5.7 in a f body cuz im about to also
are u running a ls2 on a 5.7 in a f body cuz im about to also
#6
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ic yea ive heard a couple things about the #7 cylinder having problems...Im building a TT370 and prob going to go with the ls2 intake after hearing this and i know theyre def cheaper. i was going to go with l92 setup and ls3/fast intake but have been seeing people make just as good of numbers with 317/cathedral port castings and the l92 take a offset intake rocker arm...
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (71)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Brady, Pa
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went with an LS2 for boost. There are some other things you need to do to be able to run an LS2 on an LS1. I had to goto a holley tb for the throttle bracket. Shim the fuel rails and the MAP sensor mounts different.