Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How would this be different than x-pipe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2003, 12:19 AM
  #1  
Gev
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
Gev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default How would this be different than x-pipe?

I was thinking about how to make a true dual exhaust system that exits out the rear.

It has been beaten to death that a 3" catback will support all the flow needed for big horsepower. The problem with xpipe setups is that they dont exit out the rear.

What exactly are the benefits of an xpipe setup?

And how would the setup on the bottom be any different than the one up top?

The bottom one is the exhaust pipe cut down the center with a divider welded into it to separate the gases. How is this any different? Which one would perform better?
Attached Thumbnails How would this be different than x-pipe?-xpipe.jpg  
Old 11-03-2003, 12:31 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
blk~2000~Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Marysville, OH
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The only problem might be that the single pipe could be a bottle neck on certain applications. It doesn't make much sense to go from to 3" headers down to a single 3" pipe then back to two 3" exits. If the center pipe was larger than the header pipes it would not be a problem. The other problem is the rasp associated with a single pipe like that. True duals like your first example sound better.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 PM.