Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why doesn't the 2001+ LS1 have a 6500 rpm redline too?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2010, 01:26 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Cobra4B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why doesn't the 2001+ LS1 have a 6500 rpm redline too?

I recently acquired a 2003 vert and got to thinking about this. The only difference between the two motors is the heads, valves, springs, and camshaft. However, the 241 heads are very close to the 243s in terms of flow. The shortblock is the same and the intake manifold exhaust (other than the catback) is all the same.

I know lighter components help w/ increased revs, but plenty of people install aftermarket heads like AFRs or TrickFlows which have standard steel valves and spin then w/o issue.

Maybe it's a powerband thing? But the car pulls strong all the way to rev limiter.

-Brian
Old 01-27-2010, 01:37 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

241 and 243 heads are not "very close in terms of flow"

Due mainly to the cam, the LS1 doesn't make power over 6000rpm.

LS1 and LS6 shortblocks are NOT the same. Block, pistons, and rods are different.
Old 01-27-2010, 01:39 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
teke184's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Key West, Florida
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cobra4B
The only difference between the two motors is the heads, valves, springs, and camshaft. However, the 241 heads are very close to the 243s in terms of flow. The shortblock is the same and the intake manifold exhaust (other than the catback) is all the same.


i think you answered your own question. those things you list are the main reason for reving higher

also

not all 01+ fbodies got the ls6 block
Old 01-27-2010, 02:00 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Cobra4B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marc 85Z28
241 and 243 heads are not "very close in terms of flow"

Due mainly to the cam, the LS1 doesn't make power over 6000rpm.

LS1 and LS6 shortblocks are NOT the same. Block, pistons, and rods are different.
In 2001 all C5 Corvettes got the LS6 block and intake manifold as well as the upgraded exhaust manifolds and h-pipe. I understand that for the F-body it was hit/miss as to which setup you got, but in the C5s they all got it. 2001+ LS1/LS6s also got stronger sleeved rod bolts and the 2002+ cars got coated piston skirts to reduce slap on cold starts.

In addition to those upgrades the 2001+ cars got the 241s and a revised cam vs. the previous '97-'00 cars.

Anyone have a stock flow comparison between a 241 and 243?
Old 01-27-2010, 03:00 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but didnt 2003 ls1's come with 241 heads and 04 they started with the 243?
Old 01-27-2010, 03:06 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Cobra4B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nah... 243s are Z06 heads and the standard LS1 never got them.
Old 01-27-2010, 03:11 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I definitely know that the 04-up ls1's had them atleast in the GTO so I'd imagine the corvette's would too.
Old 01-27-2010, 03:20 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (44)
 
PowerShift408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
I definitely know that the 04-up ls1's had them atleast in the GTO so I'd imagine the corvette's would too.
I don't think GTOs got 243s until 05, when they got the LS2.
Old 01-27-2010, 04:17 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (34)
 
headed-ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

No ls1 motor in a 04 gto or vette got 243's the 05 gto and vettes got the 243's and the 799's(similar head).
Old 01-27-2010, 06:27 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
MikeG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It's all about the powerband of the LS1 vs LS6. LS1's fall off after 6k, no reason to rev higher.
Old 01-27-2010, 09:21 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Cobra4B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PowerShift408
I don't think GTOs got 243s until 05, when they got the LS2.
Originally Posted by headed-ws6
No ls1 motor in a 04 gto or vette got 243's the 05 gto and vettes got the 243's and the 799's(similar head).
You both are correct... the LS2 got the 243 heads and a 2001 Z06 cam.
Originally Posted by MikeG
It's all about the powerband of the LS1 vs LS6. LS1's fall off after 6k, no reason to rev higher.
Makes sense I guess... even w/ the 2001+ upgrades (intake manifold, revised cam, exhaust manifolds, etc.)? The car seems have a very linear pull to the 6200 rpm limiter... I can't imagine another 400 rpms being an issue.
Old 01-28-2010, 05:50 AM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
MikeG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Have you never seen a dyno graph of a stock LS1?
Old 01-28-2010, 09:02 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Cobra4B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MikeG
Have you never seen a dyno graph of a stock LS1?
Never owned one until now... so no, never really paid attention to stock graphs, just know they make 305-315 rwhp stock in a C5 and 340-350 rwhp w/ headers and a tune.
Old 01-28-2010, 11:02 AM
  #14  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
 
Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The cam is the limiter (followed by valve springs being a physical limit; over spin it at your own peril). A stock cammed LS1 is NOT pulling at 61-6200; you need to recalibrate your butt-dyno Brian
Old 01-28-2010, 01:26 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Cobra4B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok... so I'll throw in some yellows and rev! Honestly the car has a very broad powerband. Definately has more low end response than my cammed LS6 and feels fairly linear all the way up... obviously it lacks the strong pull the LS6 has from 3500 on up, but it doesn't fall away.

You want to drive a car that's a slug up top? Go drive a '96-'98 2V GT mustang... car makes peak torque at like 3500 rpms and is an complete dog over 4500 and it has a 6k redline. Back in highschool me and my buddy got our best 1/4 mile times in it shifting at 5k rpms... it was his car and we'd lie to his parent telling them we were gonig to "watch" drag racing :p
Old 01-28-2010, 04:01 PM
  #16  
Restricted User
iTrader: (10)
 
Zero4488's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jersey
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here is a dyno sheet of a stock motor LS1 (241 heads). Does have some basic bolt ons. Was dyno'd on ECS's Dyno Pac. You can clearly see it drops off but not tremendously....

Old 01-28-2010, 04:10 PM
  #17  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Ryne @ CMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: murrieta
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cobra4B
Ok... so I'll throw in some yellows and rev! Honestly the car has a very broad powerband. Definately has more low end response than my cammed LS6 and feels fairly linear all the way up... obviously it lacks the strong pull the LS6 has from 3500 on up, but it doesn't fall away.

You want to drive a car that's a slug up top? Go drive a '96-'98 2V GT mustang... car makes peak torque at like 3500 rpms and is an complete dog over 4500 and it has a 6k redline. Back in highschool me and my buddy got our best 1/4 mile times in it shifting at 5k rpms... it was his car and we'd lie to his parent telling them we were gonig to "watch" drag racing :p
even if your throw yellow springs on the motor, its not going make power any higher... why rev the crap out of it for no reason??
Old 01-28-2010, 06:44 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Cobra4B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was joking around... I'll probably just get headers and a tune and then some 3.90 gears down the road.
Old 01-28-2010, 06:57 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

So now you're thinking gears to this "I'm going to leave it stock" car?
Old 01-28-2010, 10:18 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Cobra4B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah man.... I "think" I'm gonna do lots of stuff, but we'll see. Car is definately getting wheels next, then after that probably some headers after i finish the kitchen floor.


Quick Reply: Why doesn't the 2001+ LS1 have a 6500 rpm redline too?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 AM.