Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Speed Density, no MAF, what coupler?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2010, 06:44 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
matrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Speed Density, no MAF, what coupler?

Just got the car tuned speed density, gettin rid of the MAF, but I need a coupler to replace the stock stuff. The tuner was talking he heard a fernco coupler from home depot in a specific size works, but hadn't heard anything more about. For those of you SD guys, what did you do? Does anyone make a conversion kit?
Old 02-04-2010, 08:51 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (20)
 
hitmanws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

the fernco 3x3 coupler at hone depot should work just fine
Old 02-05-2010, 07:59 AM
  #3  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
5LTRETR97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Whats the advantages of getting rid of the MAF? Just curious. Thanks.
Old 02-05-2010, 11:27 AM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Pseudonym's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 578
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I managed to get the stock coupler from the throttle body to the air lid after I removed my MAF.

Last edited by Pseudonym; 02-13-2010 at 05:00 PM. Reason: incorrect info removed
Old 02-05-2010, 02:23 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
matrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hrm, you streched out the stock one and it made it? I'll have to see if thats possible. I'm worried about going with the fernco because I've heard they can crack lids because they are so stiff, but maybe I heard wrong? I'm also looking for something to replace the stock crap with, because I would like some smooth bellows, but if its stretched out it would smooth it out a lot. Gotta wait for this crap weather to pass to do anything with it anyways
Old 02-05-2010, 10:38 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
 
01'SSLSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

siliconeintakes.com has what u want.
if u get one, let us know how customer service is?
hope this helps
Old 02-05-2010, 10:41 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
 
nemss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

any coupler from the TB to a K&N intake? the hole is oval on the K&N
Old 02-07-2010, 10:21 AM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

i am going with a 4" aluminum tube and then this 22* elbow...

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...ee-inside.html
Old 02-11-2010, 08:47 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Pseudonym's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 578
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by matrik
Hrm, you streched out the stock one and it made it? I'll have to see if thats possible. I'm worried about going with the fernco because I've heard they can crack lids because they are so stiff, but maybe I heard wrong? I'm also looking for something to replace the stock crap with, because I would like some smooth bellows, but if its stretched out it would smooth it out a lot. Gotta wait for this crap weather to pass to do anything with it anyways
It made it from my NW 92mm tb to my SLP lid and fit pretty nicely. It did smooth out some, but it is still ribbed like an accordian. Don't do that if you want a smooth bellow, but keep the stock bellow in case the smooth bellow doesn't work out.
Old 02-12-2010, 11:51 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
LSGunZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pseudonym
The advantage is few horsepower and better throttle response because it doesn't have to wait to get the readings from the MAF or something.

I managed to get the stock coupler from the throttle body to the air lid after I removed my MAF.

This is false, I dont think there is much delay with a MAF either..
Old 02-12-2010, 11:54 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
SIC LSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,355
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

4"x6" http://intakehoses.com/Merchant2/mer...egory_Code=SC4
What i have. yes its on a stock TB but it is clamped down a lot. It better for bigger TB

Old 02-12-2010, 11:58 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pseudonym
The advantage is few horsepower and better throttle response because it doesn't have to wait to get the readings from the MAF or something.

I managed to get the stock coupler from the throttle body to the air lid after I removed my MAF.
yea...no.

unless you can move your foot faster than 3 milliseconds, your not going to out run the MAF signal. im pretty sure the computer knows what your doing before you do.
Old 02-13-2010, 12:02 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
SIC LSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,355
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

the only power gained is from going from the small maff hole to a open 4" pipe. Other then that its the same. I just like not having to worry about a maff or the troubles of having it tuned Ive been SD for 3+ years. Car was tuned in hawaii, then lived in missouri and -15 deg weather and now in florida and it is good everywhere
Old 02-13-2010, 07:25 AM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
transam69230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

x2 on intakehoses.com I have the exact same coupler!
Old 02-13-2010, 09:15 AM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (91)
 
MUSTANGBRKR02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Why not just unplug the maf?
Old 02-13-2010, 04:35 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
LSGunZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SIC LSX
4"x6" http://intakehoses.com/Merchant2/mer...egory_Code=SC4
What i have. yes its on a stock TB but it is clamped down a lot. It better for bigger TB


So far this seems like the cheapest priced, good quality product
Old 02-13-2010, 04:48 PM
  #17  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
matrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow, I forgot about this post because it was gettin kind of old. Awesome replies guys! Thanks for all the info, that last 4x6 looks pretty good. To someone who asked about the benefit, I definitely noticed better throttle response, as per hp gained I would say zero probably. However, the main benefit, as my tuner was talking about, is that when you stay with the MAF, about a year down the road your A/F could be almost a point off without changing anything and letting the MAF and the computer control the A/F. However by going SD, it's going to remain the same by taking the MAF out of the equation.

As per unlpugging it, I've already done that. I want to clean the engine bay up and get a large smooth bellows at the same time to remove the stock crap
Old 02-13-2010, 04:51 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
matrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why not go with the 3x6? http://intakehoses.com/Merchant2/mer...egory_Code=SC4 Did you go with the 4inch so you wouldn't have a problem stretching it over the tb? I think a 4in would be really large and require some major clamping down to seal it? Do you have a picture of that on your setup you can post? Thanks.
Old 02-13-2010, 04:59 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Pseudonym's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 578
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LSGunZ28
This is false, I dont think there is much delay with a MAF either..
Ok, my tuner said that is what he saw on his car. I thought it was hard to believe, that's why I added "or something" at the end of my comment.

Is there any benefit? (I did a motor swap when I did mine. So I can't compare before and after.)

Since my comment is incorrect I will remove it. I don't want to spread false information.

Last edited by Pseudonym; 02-14-2010 at 08:53 AM.
Old 02-13-2010, 11:10 PM
  #20  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
LSGunZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pseudonym
Ok, my tuner said that is what he saw on his car. I thought it was hard to believe, that's why I added "or something" at the end of my comment.

Is there any benefit? (I did a motor swap when I did mine. So I can't compare before and after.)

Since my comment is incorrect I will remove it. I don't want to spread false information
Thats generous of you..

I know that when you go to a bigger cam, its wiser to tune it speed density because the overlap of the cam could throw readings off to the MAF, but sensors such as MAF and o2 sensors work very quickly.. Honestly, I cant recall why its better to use a speed density tune on stock-like or bolt on cars.. But I know due to cams having overlap its a better choice to run speed density vs MAF.. maybe MAf can be used to tune radical engines as well.. MAYBE, but right know I cant gather the information in my head to explain why or why not..


MAF and speed density are just 2 different types of engine management systems on cars.


Quick Reply: Speed Density, no MAF, what coupler?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 AM.