is it worth it to swap the bbk for a fast 102 for my set up
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: longbeach CA
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is it worth it to swap the bbk for a fast 102 for my set up
ok guys is it worth the money to swap out my bbk intake and tb for a fast 102/102 my curent mods are slpcai,mti lid,slp maf,bbk intake,bbk,tb,pacesetter lts,offroad y and a cut out with a ls6 cam and a slp pulley it put down 361 rwhp with a tune and ran 7.7 in the 1/8 when the car was auto with a vig 36-3800 stall
and now the car has a t56 swap and the new mods that are about to get installed are
lg 228/232
tsp 2.5 5.3 heads
ls2 chain
tsp ported oil pump
trickflow pushrods
ls7 lifters
please comment
and now the car has a t56 swap and the new mods that are about to get installed are
lg 228/232
tsp 2.5 5.3 heads
ls2 chain
tsp ported oil pump
trickflow pushrods
ls7 lifters
please comment
Trending Topics
#12
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
You gain across the board with the FAST intake thats for sure. Most likely in the 10-15hp range. People who are dissapointed with the cathedral port version just have bad data. I havent ever been dissapaointed with a FAST intake and Ive installed and tested a lot of them.
My stock LQ9, with all of its 190s duration, .469" lift, stock exhaust manifolds and all picked up 21rwhp with a FAST intake. So it doesnt require heads and cam, itll make more sure, but doesnt require it.
My stock LQ9, with all of its 190s duration, .469" lift, stock exhaust manifolds and all picked up 21rwhp with a FAST intake. So it doesnt require heads and cam, itll make more sure, but doesnt require it.