Anyone do a 3" y to flowmaster merge and single 4" out dumped?
#1
Anyone do a 3" y to flowmaster merge and single 4" out dumped?
I'm wanting to take off my tsp true duals and go back to a 3" y pipe with a 3" inlet 4" outlet flowmaster merge with single 4" pipe to a dynomax muffler probably dumped before the axle.
Anyone do this ? If so can you post pics and sound clips if you have any also pros/cons and opinions of this setup. Will be going on a h/c/I nitrous street car that's lowered
Anyone do this ? If so can you post pics and sound clips if you have any also pros/cons and opinions of this setup. Will be going on a h/c/I nitrous street car that's lowered
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ihave mufflex ypipe(has same merge as flowmaster) thats dumped with a 4in dynomax bullet
very deep no rasp..we had to weld in a custom 4in u bend so that it was turned in slight angke so its not totally dumped striat on ground,,i get compliments all the time..
reason why i did it was i use to have a hooker y pipe and one side looked like it was blocked and restrictive..so we looked up mufflex which had the same merge..then sold my dynomax 3in bullet and bought 4inch
very deep no rasp..we had to weld in a custom 4in u bend so that it was turned in slight angke so its not totally dumped striat on ground,,i get compliments all the time..
reason why i did it was i use to have a hooker y pipe and one side looked like it was blocked and restrictive..so we looked up mufflex which had the same merge..then sold my dynomax 3in bullet and bought 4inch
#3
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
Hands down best exhaust to have for f bodies IMO. If you do a setup like this one I built then you cant tell the difference in sound between it and dual 3" x pipe. I actually think this setup made more power than my 3" duals with x pipe plus its lighter and its all welded together and installs/removes with a snap!
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hands down best exhaust to have for f bodies IMO. If you do a setup like this one I built then you cant tell the difference in sound between it and dual 3" x pipe. I actually think this setup made more power than my 3" duals with x pipe plus its lighter and its all welded together and installs/removes with a snap!
#5
10 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
Hands down best exhaust to have for f bodies IMO. If you do a setup like this one I built then you cant tell the difference in sound between it and dual 3" x pipe. I actually think this setup made more power than my 3" duals with x pipe plus its lighter and its all welded together and installs/removes with a snap!
#6
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
I'd run it over the axle an put a muffler in the stock location.
This way you'll have a lot better muffler selection.
IMO, Better selection means better chance you'll get what you really want.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ho...9hkr/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/wlk-17557/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/qtp-12400/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/fl...0-10/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/mpe-14153/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/mpe-12594/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/bor-40947/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/bor-40948/overview/
This way you'll have a lot better muffler selection.
IMO, Better selection means better chance you'll get what you really want.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ho...9hkr/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/wlk-17557/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/qtp-12400/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/fl...0-10/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/mpe-14153/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/mpe-12594/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/bor-40947/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/bor-40948/overview/
#7
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
Bottom line is this. The LS engines are probably rasping with any exhaust you put on it around the 2800-3200 range under load. You dont get rid of it, you just muffle it. Dumping the exhaust gives the sound a place to resonate. The undercarriage of the car muffles the exhaust and acts like a chamber to resonate in.
Imagine a subwoofer box in your trunk with the trunklid down. Its booming, its deep and clean. Open up the trunk or sit the subwoofer box outside and the subs sound like complete crap. They just need something for the sound to resonate in.
I have literally built every exhaust imaginable for f bodies. I know what something is gonna sound like before I make it.
Trending Topics
#8
10 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
I have built duals with x pipe just like the tsp duals, and if you run them out the back it rasp as bad as any y pipe you ever heard. I added some extensions to mine one time and ran my duals out the back versus dumped and them bastards came back off the same day. Its crazy how the duals went from deep and no rasp to sounding like a loudmouth with ory by running them out the back.
Bottom line is this. The LS engines are probably rasping with any exhaust you put on it around the 2800-3200 range under load. You dont get rid of it, you just muffle it. Dumping the exhaust gives the sound a place to resonate. The undercarriage of the car muffles the exhaust and acts like a chamber to resonate in.
Imagine a subwoofer box in your trunk with the trunklid down. Its booming, its deep and clean. Open up the trunk or sit the subwoofer box outside and the subs sound like complete crap. They just need something for the sound to resonate in.
I have literally built every exhaust imaginable for f bodies. I know what something is gonna sound like before I make it.
Bottom line is this. The LS engines are probably rasping with any exhaust you put on it around the 2800-3200 range under load. You dont get rid of it, you just muffle it. Dumping the exhaust gives the sound a place to resonate. The undercarriage of the car muffles the exhaust and acts like a chamber to resonate in.
Imagine a subwoofer box in your trunk with the trunklid down. Its booming, its deep and clean. Open up the trunk or sit the subwoofer box outside and the subs sound like complete crap. They just need something for the sound to resonate in.
I have literally built every exhaust imaginable for f bodies. I know what something is gonna sound like before I make it.
#9
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
Look at the pic of the exhaust i posted. Imagine if you cut the merge right where it transistions from the funnel shape to round pipe. If I simply added added two pieces of 3" pipe right there instead of one 4" pipe do you really think thats gonna change anything? I mean we are only talking about about a short 2' piece of pipe at the most.
Even x pipe merge two pipes into one. Its then split into two pipes instead of one but on a dumped setup its just a measley 2 foot section of pipe.
My car felt stronger with this system than my duals. I think it flows better because this merge is much better than an x because the pipes are running parallel to each other as apposed to coming together at a 45* angle or even more. Also the x merge is taking two 3" pipes and squeezing them into a merge about the size of a single 3" section as apposed to the flowmaster merge gradually going from a 6" wide section down to a 4" section. After the merge there simply is not enough pipe left to change one way or the other with respect to flow (Single 4" or dual 3").
I went this route indefinately because it sounded as good as duals, outperformed duals, was lighter than duals, easier to install and remove than duals, and fit the car better than duals because it followed the factory exhaust location. This setup works with all torque arm styles, The pre fabbed duals that are out there for these cars will not work with body mounted torque arms.
The key is the bottleneck between the two setups. The x pipe has much more of a bottleneck at the merge.
Everytime I chime in and post a pic of my y pipe exhaust I start getting messages about wanting one built. I am officially out of the business. I only have room for certain things in my life right now and unfortunately racing and working on cars is no longer one of them.
Even x pipe merge two pipes into one. Its then split into two pipes instead of one but on a dumped setup its just a measley 2 foot section of pipe.
My car felt stronger with this system than my duals. I think it flows better because this merge is much better than an x because the pipes are running parallel to each other as apposed to coming together at a 45* angle or even more. Also the x merge is taking two 3" pipes and squeezing them into a merge about the size of a single 3" section as apposed to the flowmaster merge gradually going from a 6" wide section down to a 4" section. After the merge there simply is not enough pipe left to change one way or the other with respect to flow (Single 4" or dual 3").
I went this route indefinately because it sounded as good as duals, outperformed duals, was lighter than duals, easier to install and remove than duals, and fit the car better than duals because it followed the factory exhaust location. This setup works with all torque arm styles, The pre fabbed duals that are out there for these cars will not work with body mounted torque arms.
The key is the bottleneck between the two setups. The x pipe has much more of a bottleneck at the merge.
Everytime I chime in and post a pic of my y pipe exhaust I start getting messages about wanting one built. I am officially out of the business. I only have room for certain things in my life right now and unfortunately racing and working on cars is no longer one of them.
#10
Launching!
After ditching the crappy 3" ORY I installed the 3" into 4" from Mufflex and welded in about 20" of 4" then reduced to 3" going over the axle into my Borla. Hell I picked up 2 mph with this change. I have NO rasp.
#12
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
OP, I run the 3" in 4" out FM merge with a Magnaflow 14419, but i'm running it out the tail pipes. Regarless, what impressed me was the power gain and rasp reduction with just a simple exhaust modification. My Pacesetter ORY had the crappiest merge i've ever seen lol. Just for reference my car is a HCI + 100 shot
#13
TECH Resident
iTrader: (34)
Added the Bullet to eliminate the rasp. 4" exhaust when I need it, Magnaflow to keep it quiet if the time requires it. Everything was chopped to the absolute max to be able to incorporate the muffler and have a good cutout placement w/ very minimal muffler / floor massaging. Painted in high temp grill paint.
#15
TECH Resident
iTrader: (34)
Everything I used to build this to also flow through the magnaflow catback when I needed it to be quieter. I don't have all the part numbers, but you get the idea.
I purchased a generic Summit u-bend and used that to cut exact angles to turn from the y pipe to the flowmaster merge: sum-622004
sum-g2990 (o2 bung)
flo-y300400 (merge)
wlk-41989 (reducer into catback)
wlk-33274 (stainless slip fit clamps)
wlk-24217 (4" bullet)
wlk-41367 (turndown)
sum-622004 (pipe to custom cut to tie into merge)
qtp 4" stainless cutout pipe
qtp 4" electric cutout
I purchased a generic Summit u-bend and used that to cut exact angles to turn from the y pipe to the flowmaster merge: sum-622004
sum-g2990 (o2 bung)
flo-y300400 (merge)
wlk-41989 (reducer into catback)
wlk-33274 (stainless slip fit clamps)
wlk-24217 (4" bullet)
wlk-41367 (turndown)
sum-622004 (pipe to custom cut to tie into merge)
qtp 4" stainless cutout pipe
qtp 4" electric cutout