Flowmaster Crossflow muffler: Is it really that bad?
05-28-2004, 11:09 AM
#1
Flowmaster Crossflow muffler: Is it really that bad? I'm not looking for opinions as much as facts. I just bought a bone stock 2000 Trans Am that I'm going to slowly mod. This will be my 5th LS1 project. The TA is a 6 speed model. The only non-stock part on it is a Flowmaster cross-flow muffler piped into the stock tips. I've head some people say that they flow no better than stock. Some say they make as much power as other aftermarket mufflers of similar pipe diameter. It sounds freaking bad-*** and I hate to change it, but I will if it's really that much of a horsepower detriment. Believe me, I've done nearly ALL the mods before. I'm not afraid of making changes...it's just I'd hate to get rid of a great sounding exhaust, spend $700 on the latest and greatest, only to gain 2 rwhp.
My eventual goal is to go with long tubes, but I always want the exhaust to exit out the rear. Too old for a loud exhaust dumping under the car. For now, I'd just like to find out if I'm wasting effort keeping the Flowmaster. Remember, I prefer facts to opinions or hearsay.
My eventual goal is to go with long tubes, but I always want the exhaust to exit out the rear. Too old for a loud exhaust dumping under the car. For now, I'd just like to find out if I'm wasting effort keeping the Flowmaster. Remember, I prefer facts to opinions or hearsay.
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
05-28-2004, 11:51 AM
#2
I'm with the people who say "FLOWMASTER SUCKS!!!" I went from a B&B to a Blowmaster 80 series (wanted more sound.....B&B was too quiet) and the car actually lost 5 HP (felt even more on the Butt-O-Meter). 
Then I went and did a Loudmouth (MEGA FLOW) and the car went crazy
Then I went and did a Loudmouth (MEGA FLOW) and the car went crazy
05-28-2004, 12:39 PM
#3
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: I-L-L-I-N-O-I-S
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you just have the muffler ONLY, then you should probably upgrade to a full cat-back system anyway (especially if you are going with LT headers and other modifications so that the car can breathe efficiently).
But to answer your question, yes, Flowmaster cross-flow mufflers do not flow as well as other aftermarket mufflers/systems. Is this relevant on an otherwise stock or mildly modified car like yours, NO! The difference in power from the Flowmaster muffler/cat-back to another aftermarket muffler/cat-back will never be anything you'll feel on a car already making over 300rwhp. Probably like a 2-3rwhp difference (maybe 5 or so). Now on cars that aren't exactly stock, the Flowmaster has dyno-proven (I've seen it) to become a pretty big restriction, especially compared to most other aftermarket mufflers/systems or against cutouts.
But here's the thing: If you really love the sound of it that much (I actually think Flowmaster sounds GREAT too), then don't worry about this lack of flow stuff and just keep it and stick a cutout on the I-pipe. This way, you'll have the cutout (which will outperform just about every other muffler too) for when you need the max flow at the track and the Flowmaster exhaust for that great sound when you're just running around on the streets.
So it sounds like you should just keep that Flowmaster (or at least upgrade to the Flowmaster cat-back depending upon how much you want to modify the car) and just stick a cheap $35 cutout on it rather than spring more $$$ for another system you probably won't like the sound of as much...
Just my .02,
Mike
But to answer your question, yes, Flowmaster cross-flow mufflers do not flow as well as other aftermarket mufflers/systems. Is this relevant on an otherwise stock or mildly modified car like yours, NO! The difference in power from the Flowmaster muffler/cat-back to another aftermarket muffler/cat-back will never be anything you'll feel on a car already making over 300rwhp. Probably like a 2-3rwhp difference (maybe 5 or so). Now on cars that aren't exactly stock, the Flowmaster has dyno-proven (I've seen it) to become a pretty big restriction, especially compared to most other aftermarket mufflers/systems or against cutouts.
But here's the thing: If you really love the sound of it that much (I actually think Flowmaster sounds GREAT too), then don't worry about this lack of flow stuff and just keep it and stick a cutout on the I-pipe. This way, you'll have the cutout (which will outperform just about every other muffler too) for when you need the max flow at the track and the Flowmaster exhaust for that great sound when you're just running around on the streets.
So it sounds like you should just keep that Flowmaster (or at least upgrade to the Flowmaster cat-back depending upon how much you want to modify the car) and just stick a cheap $35 cutout on it rather than spring more $$$ for another system you probably won't like the sound of as much...
Just my .02,
Mike
05-28-2004, 01:06 PM
#4
TECH Resident
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Troy Al
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting review of about 15 mufflers
This was posted on www.fullsizechevy.com which is a truck forum. Supposedly this review was performed by Martel Brothers...
*******************
All tests via an independent lab
All tests @ 15” wc
2 “ Straight Pipe 283 CFM
2 ¼ “ Straight Pipe 365 CFM
2 ½ “ Straight Pipe 521 CFM
2 ¼” Typical Bent tailpipe 268 CFM
2 ½” Typical Bent Tailpipe 417 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet_ Glass Pack Tips- No Louvers- Smooth 274 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet- Glass Pack Tips-Louvered 133 CFM
Same as above set for reverse flow 141 CFM
2 ¼” Cherry Bomb 239 CFM
2 ½” Cherry Bomb 294 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Dynomax Super Turbo 278 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Ultraflow Bullet 512 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Gibson Superflow 267 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Flowmaster ( 2 Chamber) 249 CFM
2 ½” Inlet Outlet Flowmaster ( 3 Chamber) 229 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet Thrush CVX 260 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Maremount Cherry Bomb 298 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Hooker Aero Chamber 324 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Hooker Max Flow 521 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Borla Turbo 373 CFM
2 1/2" Inlet/Outlet Magnaflow 284 CFM
Standard OEM 2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet 138-152 CFM
Standard OEM 2 ½” Inlet/Outlet 161-197 CFM
The madrel bending of the pipes done by aftermarket exhaust companies is good for 2-4 h.p. depending on the severity of the stock bends. Most local exhaust places dont have a mandrel bender so changing the pipes out doesnt do anything if pipe size it not increased.
My opinion, if its more noise and a little more power just add the best flowing stainless muffler to the current system and never do it again. If you increase pipe sizes, then a local shop and only stainless. Dont care about money but want ease and better gains than most local shops can offer with no pipe size increase, and aftermarket exhaust.
NOISE does not mean power, some think it does is why Flowmasters are sold in the numbers they are!!!
This was posted on www.fullsizechevy.com which is a truck forum. Supposedly this review was performed by Martel Brothers...
*******************
All tests via an independent lab
All tests @ 15” wc
2 “ Straight Pipe 283 CFM
2 ¼ “ Straight Pipe 365 CFM
2 ½ “ Straight Pipe 521 CFM
2 ¼” Typical Bent tailpipe 268 CFM
2 ½” Typical Bent Tailpipe 417 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet_ Glass Pack Tips- No Louvers- Smooth 274 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet- Glass Pack Tips-Louvered 133 CFM
Same as above set for reverse flow 141 CFM
2 ¼” Cherry Bomb 239 CFM
2 ½” Cherry Bomb 294 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Dynomax Super Turbo 278 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Ultraflow Bullet 512 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Gibson Superflow 267 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Flowmaster ( 2 Chamber) 249 CFM
2 ½” Inlet Outlet Flowmaster ( 3 Chamber) 229 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet Thrush CVX 260 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Maremount Cherry Bomb 298 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Hooker Aero Chamber 324 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Hooker Max Flow 521 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Borla Turbo 373 CFM
2 1/2" Inlet/Outlet Magnaflow 284 CFM
Standard OEM 2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet 138-152 CFM
Standard OEM 2 ½” Inlet/Outlet 161-197 CFM
The madrel bending of the pipes done by aftermarket exhaust companies is good for 2-4 h.p. depending on the severity of the stock bends. Most local exhaust places dont have a mandrel bender so changing the pipes out doesnt do anything if pipe size it not increased.
My opinion, if its more noise and a little more power just add the best flowing stainless muffler to the current system and never do it again. If you increase pipe sizes, then a local shop and only stainless. Dont care about money but want ease and better gains than most local shops can offer with no pipe size increase, and aftermarket exhaust.
NOISE does not mean power, some think it does is why Flowmasters are sold in the numbers they are!!!
05-28-2004, 01:12 PM
#5
I have a 2000 Camaro SS that had one non stock part and that was a Flowmaster catback w/chrome tips. Now I have a set of Macs w/2 1/2" ORY into the Flowmaster catback and I'm kinda old too maybe thats why I love the sound it makes when its bellering to the tune of 4500 RPM and nice and throaty in the lower RPM range. The car has a SLP lid and KnN filter with no other mods just a tune and Running 12.80 at 109 1.80 60ft on Nitto 555r Drag Radials. I have a set of SLP LTs laying on the bench that I dont want to put on because I dont want to mess up the sound.
I LOVE MY FLOWMASTER SOUND
Tom
I LOVE MY FLOWMASTER SOUND
Tom
05-28-2004, 01:40 PM
#7
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by killer01ws6
Interesting review of about 15 mufflers
This was posted on www.fullsizechevy.com which is a truck forum. Supposedly this review was performed by Martel Brothers...
*******************
All tests via an independent lab
All tests @ 15” wc
2 “ Straight Pipe 283 CFM
2 ¼ “ Straight Pipe 365 CFM
2 ½ “ Straight Pipe 521 CFM
2 ¼” Typical Bent tailpipe 268 CFM
2 ½” Typical Bent Tailpipe 417 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet_ Glass Pack Tips- No Louvers- Smooth 274 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet- Glass Pack Tips-Louvered 133 CFM
Same as above set for reverse flow 141 CFM
2 ¼” Cherry Bomb 239 CFM
2 ½” Cherry Bomb 294 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Dynomax Super Turbo 278 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Ultraflow Bullet 512 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Gibson Superflow 267 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Flowmaster ( 2 Chamber) 249 CFM
2 ½” Inlet Outlet Flowmaster ( 3 Chamber) 229 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet Thrush CVX 260 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Maremount Cherry Bomb 298 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Hooker Aero Chamber 324 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Hooker Max Flow 521 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Borla Turbo 373 CFM
2 1/2" Inlet/Outlet Magnaflow 284 CFM
Standard OEM 2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet 138-152 CFM
Standard OEM 2 ½” Inlet/Outlet 161-197 CFM
The madrel bending of the pipes done by aftermarket exhaust companies is good for 2-4 h.p. depending on the severity of the stock bends. Most local exhaust places dont have a mandrel bender so changing the pipes out doesnt do anything if pipe size it not increased.
My opinion, if its more noise and a little more power just add the best flowing stainless muffler to the current system and never do it again. If you increase pipe sizes, then a local shop and only stainless. Dont care about money but want ease and better gains than most local shops can offer with no pipe size increase, and aftermarket exhaust.
NOISE does not mean power, some think it does is why Flowmasters are sold in the numbers they are!!!
This was posted on www.fullsizechevy.com which is a truck forum. Supposedly this review was performed by Martel Brothers...
*******************
All tests via an independent lab
All tests @ 15” wc
2 “ Straight Pipe 283 CFM
2 ¼ “ Straight Pipe 365 CFM
2 ½ “ Straight Pipe 521 CFM
2 ¼” Typical Bent tailpipe 268 CFM
2 ½” Typical Bent Tailpipe 417 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet_ Glass Pack Tips- No Louvers- Smooth 274 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet- Glass Pack Tips-Louvered 133 CFM
Same as above set for reverse flow 141 CFM
2 ¼” Cherry Bomb 239 CFM
2 ½” Cherry Bomb 294 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Dynomax Super Turbo 278 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Ultraflow Bullet 512 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Gibson Superflow 267 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Flowmaster ( 2 Chamber) 249 CFM
2 ½” Inlet Outlet Flowmaster ( 3 Chamber) 229 CFM
2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet Thrush CVX 260 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Maremount Cherry Bomb 298 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Hooker Aero Chamber 324 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Hooker Max Flow 521 CFM
2 ½” Inlet/Outlet Borla Turbo 373 CFM
2 1/2" Inlet/Outlet Magnaflow 284 CFM
Standard OEM 2 ¼” Inlet/Outlet 138-152 CFM
Standard OEM 2 ½” Inlet/Outlet 161-197 CFM
The madrel bending of the pipes done by aftermarket exhaust companies is good for 2-4 h.p. depending on the severity of the stock bends. Most local exhaust places dont have a mandrel bender so changing the pipes out doesnt do anything if pipe size it not increased.
My opinion, if its more noise and a little more power just add the best flowing stainless muffler to the current system and never do it again. If you increase pipe sizes, then a local shop and only stainless. Dont care about money but want ease and better gains than most local shops can offer with no pipe size increase, and aftermarket exhaust.
NOISE does not mean power, some think it does is why Flowmasters are sold in the numbers they are!!!
Trending Topics
05-28-2004, 02:06 PM
#8
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: I-L-L-I-N-O-I-S
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ferocity02
Flowmaster sounds great, but the fact is that the flow is horrible. Other cat-backs sound just as good or even better. There are better options out there.
I for one think that Borlas, SLP Loudmouths, SLP dual/duals, and a few other systems either sound like crap or just don't compare to the Flowmaster tone.
And while I do like the sound of my GMMG cat-back system, I would have just bought a Flowmaster cat-back for a 1/3 of the price if I could do it all over again because I happen to think it sounds bada$$ in its own way...
05-28-2004, 02:12 PM
#9
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally, i would think that if you aren't going to do any major mods and aren't a track *****, whats the point in if you can gain 3-5 extra rwhp out of another catback?
But I have to say the one thing i dislike about flowmasters sound is, it comes across fake. There is a major difference from sounding mean and being mean. Flowmasters are all dick no *****. Not much performance wise you can do with that. So it really depends on what you want to do with your car.
Id suggest if you are gonna stick with flows, get the full catback. The cutout idea isn't a bad idea either. But if you like the sound that much, why would you change it? and this is coming from a guy who is on his 8th exhaust set up since october '03.
Another idea, I have to throw this one out cause sound wise it was the most successful with respect to my tastes...the Hooker Catback. its quiet at idle but has a nice rumble. at WOT it sounds absolutely amazing. plus its under 300 bucks. can't beat that and it outflows many other catbacks.
But I have to say the one thing i dislike about flowmasters sound is, it comes across fake. There is a major difference from sounding mean and being mean. Flowmasters are all dick no *****. Not much performance wise you can do with that. So it really depends on what you want to do with your car.
Id suggest if you are gonna stick with flows, get the full catback. The cutout idea isn't a bad idea either. But if you like the sound that much, why would you change it? and this is coming from a guy who is on his 8th exhaust set up since october '03.
Another idea, I have to throw this one out cause sound wise it was the most successful with respect to my tastes...the Hooker Catback. its quiet at idle but has a nice rumble. at WOT it sounds absolutely amazing. plus its under 300 bucks. can't beat that and it outflows many other catbacks.
05-29-2004, 01:14 AM
#11
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wichita, KS - 1400' above sea level ;-)
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ter+borla+dyno
The dyno chart is gone from this thread, but it showed the Flowmaster crossflow costing 30 hp by 6000 RPM vs a Borla (or basically 30 HP down from ANY decent catback/muffler)....if you
would interpolate, you can figure the Flowmaster probably costs 15 hp vs
a stock muffler...
This muffler is right up there with selecting cams based on how hard they
lope
The dyno chart is gone from this thread, but it showed the Flowmaster crossflow costing 30 hp by 6000 RPM vs a Borla (or basically 30 HP down from ANY decent catback/muffler)....if you
would interpolate, you can figure the Flowmaster probably costs 15 hp vs
a stock muffler...
This muffler is right up there with selecting cams based on how hard they
lope
05-29-2004, 01:21 AM
#12
for your reference i had stock manifolds/cats/y pipe going into the flowmaster crossflow. i did a dyno run with my cutout open and closed. with it open i gained 9rwhp. i know thats not really a "fair" comparison but i have heard of people dynoing with a good catback and cutout and have gained next to nothing with the cutout open so that flowmasters gotta be holding something back..just my opinion.
matt
matt
05-29-2004, 08:56 AM
#13
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: I-L-L-I-N-O-I-S
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by redbandit98
for your reference i had stock manifolds/cats/y pipe going into the flowmaster crossflow. i did a dyno run with my cutout open and closed. with it open i gained 9rwhp. i know thats not really a "fair" comparison but i have heard of people dynoing with a good catback and cutout and have gained next to nothing with the cutout open so that flowmasters gotta be holding something back..just my opinion.
matt
matt
And besides, what difference is there between 338rwhp & 350rwhp on the streets (or even a little more than that) if you're not in an all out race???
If you can, I'd spring for the Flowmaster cat-back along with that cutout which will give your current set-up a little better flow when not running the exhaust through the dump...
05-29-2004, 09:31 PM
#14
I've got the catback and it sounds pretty good. I know it is restrictive because I have rode in cars with similar mods as mine with different exhausts and they do perform a little better. IMO a person doesn't buy exhaust for performance unless they race competitively. The reason it is bought is for sound. I am switching to true duals though when I get my headers, staying with flowmaster though, this time 10 series. 
05-29-2004, 11:07 PM
#15
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 67SS&99Z28
IMO a person doesn't buy exhaust for performance unless they race competitively.
05-30-2004, 09:48 AM
#16
Pretty much like I thought. The Flowmaster sounds great, yes. But since I'm a hard-core power junkie and have been for years, I'll most likely swap it out with some thing that sounds badass (but not too loud) and flows like a **** as I build the motor. Lots of you like the GMMG. The sound clips are awesome, but it might be a little too intense without cats. I don't have to run cats where I'm moving to. I plan on taking this motor well into the 400-500+ rwhp level (as I have with past LS1 cars), but I want to do this one right. No downsides. No low hanging exhaust. No Frankenpipe setups. No tinny sounds coming from under the hood. I'm talking about 1st class all the way, from headers (if needed) all the way out the back to the duals coming out the rear of the car.
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
05-30-2004, 11:58 AM
#17
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just had to throw my .02 in on this one. I went from a cheap Flowpro single 3" exhaust on my truck to dual 3" flowmaster BB muflers and lost .6 in the 1/8!!!! I went home and cut the flows off and went back to the track and ran .8 faster than i had an hour earlier with the flows. Screw RWHP, look at the track time difference.
If i could go back and do my car exhaust over i would get rid of the cats, get the ORY, and keep the stock cat back. For races i'd get a 3" ele cutout. To late now though. lol
Hind sight, what a bitch!
If i could go back and do my car exhaust over i would get rid of the cats, get the ORY, and keep the stock cat back. For races i'd get a 3" ele cutout. To late now though. lol
Hind sight, what a bitch!
05-30-2004, 01:11 PM
#18
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Patrick G
Pretty much like I thought. The Flowmaster sounds great, yes. But since I'm a hard-core power junkie and have been for years, I'll most likely swap it out with some thing that sounds badass (but not too loud) and flows like a **** as I build the motor. Lots of you like the GMMG. The sound clips are awesome, but it might be a little too intense without cats. I don't have to run cats where I'm moving to. I plan on taking this motor well into the 400-500+ rwhp level (as I have with past LS1 cars), but I want to do this one right. No downsides. No low hanging exhaust. No Frankenpipe setups. No tinny sounds coming from under the hood. I'm talking about 1st class all the way, from headers (if needed) all the way out the back to the duals coming out the rear of the car.
FWIW I lose 15HP and 15TQ throughout the entire power band going from an open cutout to full exaust with my Flowmaster. The previous owner put it on and I have yet to remove it. I will be getting some T. Duals fabbed up after I complete my bolt on's.
Do yourself a favor and save up your money and get a reputable shop to do it for you. You wont be dissapointed. You should be able to get a set done for what it would cost you for a GMMG cat back. Good Luck.
05-31-2004, 08:52 AM
#19
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lagrange Ga/Mayport Fl
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A friend dyno'ed his with a flowmaster and cutout. He gained 41 rwhp through the cutouts. Course he dyno'ed 609 rwhp so maybe that had something to do with the huge power difference.
05-31-2004, 09:27 AM
#20
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dudas35
A friend dyno'ed his with a flowmaster and cutout. He gained 41 rwhp through the cutouts. Course he dyno'ed 609 rwhp so maybe that had something to do with the huge power difference.
Screw Flowmaster and let the gasses loose. With LS1s less back pressure=more power.