Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2" TSP Stainless 4th Gen Fbody Headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2015, 04:16 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (37)
 
Mikey 97Z M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default 2" TSP Stainless 4th Gen Fbody Headers

OK, been talking with Beau at Texas Speed and trying to persuade them into building a 2" primary header for the 4th gens.

Here is the link with more information. Post up any questions or interest in that other thread so Beau can gauge the interest level. If there is enough interest, they will produce them.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/group-pur...l#post18621010

Mike
Old 01-17-2015, 05:30 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
mjs1012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Stratford, CT
Posts: 2,687
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Would these be overkill for a stock cube ls1?
Old 01-17-2015, 07:19 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mjs1012
Would these be overkill for a stock cube ls1?
Noooo.
Old 01-17-2015, 07:59 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,046
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Put my 2 cents in. I am likening this!
Old 01-18-2015, 01:23 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
farmington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Little River SC
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

An all out 5.7 could use these but a close to stock motor, no. Would be killer for a stroker motor though
Old 01-19-2015, 07:27 AM
  #6  
Launching!
 
DaSkinnyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: unknown
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjs1012
Would these be overkill for a stock cube ls1?
No. I bet if you had an engine dyno using 3 different long tube headers from the same exact company 1 3/4" 1 7/8" and 2" primary, that each bigger size would pick up power and at the same time not lose bottom end power. My next bet on a stock cube engine a 2 1/4" primary or larger would start showing a lost wether it was mid or high rpm. Of course for every mod you continue to do to that engine you should always be gaining more power then the smaller size header primary as well as it has a good collector design and proper size.
Old 01-19-2015, 04:00 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

IMO, with a 5.7L ls1 2" primaries tubes are too big for most applications. Maybe 2" x 1-7/8" stepped header, even then I bet any gains would minimal. It would be interested in hearing what Kooks and/or ARH has to say about it.
Old 01-19-2015, 09:35 PM
  #8  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,707
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
IMO, with a 5.7L ls1 2" primaries tubes are too big for most applications. Maybe 2" x 1-7/8" stepped header, even then I bet any gains would minimal. It would be interested in hearing what Kooks and/or ARH has to say about it.
I agree. I think the ONLY guys that would benefit might be the guys running a blower... And they have deep pockets as is; small crowd.

There's comes a point of diminishing returns and I simply can't see a 2" primary offering anything over what a 346 can possibly exhale to begin with.

As Blu said, I'm willing to bet Kooks or ARH have tried this and there's simply nothing to be gained.
Old 01-20-2015, 07:10 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I totally disagree. No way a 2" header is not going to pick up on a heads, cam, intake, full bolt on LS1. I'm pretty sure this was once said about 1 7/8 headers before they became the go to header for even a bolt on only LS1. I would take a 2" header over a 1 7/8 header everyday of the week.
Old 01-20-2015, 07:29 AM
  #10  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,707
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
I totally disagree. No way a 2" header is not going to pick up on a heads, cam, intake, full bolt on LS1. I'm pretty sure this was once said about 1 7/8 headers before they became the go to header for even a bolt on only LS1. I would take a 2" header over a 1 7/8 header everyday of the week.
Agree to disagree. Remember the 434 that LOST power? The one with Frankenstein heads?

A 346 is only going to move "so much" air on its own.
Old 01-20-2015, 08:27 AM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dr_whigham
Agree to disagree. Remember the 434 that LOST power? The one with Frankenstein heads?

A 346 is only going to move "so much" air on its own.
I have not seen that thread, but I will search for it. I had all intentions of making the switch over to turbo, but I'm scraping that idea. I'm going to stay the course and continue to upgrade my NA setup, with all intentions of adding a D1SC Procharger down the road (likely well down the road). I think for my setup, I'll benefit from the 2" headers. I know my current setup is being restricted big time by the intake and headers (currently 1 3/4 with 2.5 collectors), but that will soon be rectified by getting the TSP 2" headers and likely the new MSD intake. I can't wait to make those upgrades and get the car back on the dyno to see how much it picked up.
Old 01-20-2015, 12:36 PM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,046
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

I know one think nitrous cars love big pipes!
Old 01-20-2015, 12:42 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Your soon to be nitrous car needs a set of these.
Old 01-20-2015, 04:30 PM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,046
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

O it's coming together!! If these came out already have a plan for new exhaust!
Old 01-20-2015, 08:18 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
 
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,815
Received 215 Likes on 128 Posts

Default 2 Inch Headers

1 7/8 of Comparable length primary, collector size & design will outperform
2" up to at least 700 probably 750+ NA Crank HP!
Tony Mamo made 731 Crank HP W/ 1 3/4" on a Max 454 LS, he felt
1 7/8" would have added 10-12, 15 Max.
Brian Tooley also built a 700 Crank NA HP 454 for his 9 sec Vette that I believe also Used 1 7/8" Headers.
Tests I have seen over the years with BBC 500+" did not show
Benefits with 2" over 1 7/8" until 750-800 Crank HP
Old 01-21-2015, 08:04 AM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Ok, so let's just throw this out there: Let's just say for arguments sake there are no gains to be made going with a 2" header over a 1 7/8" header on an under 700 HP engine; will there be any loss in HP or TQ?
Old 01-21-2015, 09:27 AM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,046
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Everyone should know that this isn't for a bolt on 3600 lbs street car. But I think a procharged car and nitrous car would gain for sure. Heads and cam would depending on how radical. I treat my little 346 like a race engine and abuse it. If these headers come out I would do a little test on the dyno and get real world results.
Old 01-21-2015, 10:19 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Zmg00camaross
Everyone should know that this isn't for a bolt on 3600 lbs street car. But I think a procharged car and nitrous car would gain for sure. Heads and cam would depending on how radical. I treat my little 346 like a race engine and abuse it. If these headers come out I would do a little test on the dyno and get real world results.
That's what I'd like to see. If it's not going to hurt anything going with the 2" headers, I don't see why I shouldn't do that, since my long term plans for the car include a Procharger.
Old 01-21-2015, 10:37 AM
  #19  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,707
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I'd be willing to bet you drop the K to install them. The 7/8" barely slid in... Can you imagine cramming 2" primaries up there?

Old 01-21-2015, 10:54 AM
  #20  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,046
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dr_whigham
I'd be willing to bet you drop the K to install them. The 7/8" barely slid in... Can you imagine cramming 2" primaries up there?

I have a MWC K member Mine go in like butter. I could see the issue with stock K member


Quick Reply: 2" TSP Stainless 4th Gen Fbody Headers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM.