NW 92 TB vs Fast 92 TB
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
NW 92 TB vs Fast 92 TB
I myself have learned, first hand, that fast throttle bodies are crap. I should have done more research, on here, before I bought the fast. I know there are other threads about this but I never found any pics so I thought I'd post up.
In all of the pics the NW throttle body is on the left. You can easily see the IAC port is superior in all aspects. The PCV port is also way better. The idle problem it cured, from the fast TB, is the racing idle while moving.
Don't get a Fast TB!
In all of the pics the NW throttle body is on the left. You can easily see the IAC port is superior in all aspects. The PCV port is also way better. The idle problem it cured, from the fast TB, is the racing idle while moving.
Don't get a Fast TB!
Last edited by SoFla01SSLookinstok; 02-18-2015 at 03:46 PM.
#7
TECH Veteran
I love my Nick Williams !!
Trending Topics
#9
On The Tree
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego,CA
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well that's good to know. I'll put the NW TB on my wish list for when i order my FAST 92 intake. It's got me skeptical on what the build quality of a FAST Intake is like now...
#12
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
I have been preaching this for a while now. I screwed with my fast 92 tb for weeks in september. Finally broke down and got a 102 nw and had it tuned in 3 days. I even ported the iac hole which helped a bit but not enough. car would never start cold and had an unstable idle warm.
The IAC hole is too small for a cammed car period.
The IAC hole is too small for a cammed car period.