Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

guy claiming ~60 chp gain on ls1 with fast 90

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2016, 09:07 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
foxsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 578
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default guy claiming ~60 chp gain on ls1 with fast 90

A local guy with a stock ls1 that he claims has the same .467/.479 cam as my lq4, but has headers and full exhaust and a fast 92 intake, mail order tune, is claiming the ported fast 92 is to blame. He estimates around 420 chp (ls1 6speed).
His 1/8 mile time is extremely impressive for his mods and it being a 4th gen trans am. He did a 7.3 and said he was only launching around 3500 rpm.

Do you think he actually has a much larger cam and doesn't know it or isn't telling me? My car weighs 3064 lbs and I thought I'de be around a similar 360 hp area as him at first but his 1/8 mile and chp estimate just don't make any sense to me UNLESS a fast 92 truly gives that huge of a gain even with a .467/.479 cam.

I'm way lighter and the threads on here have put a truck intake like mine in a similar boat to fast intakes for power numbers on a stockish motor. I ran a 7.72

His 7.3 1/8 mile puts him at around mid 11s in the 1/4 mile....that sounds way too fast for what he has done. Any thoughts?

Last edited by foxsl; 02-09-2016 at 03:10 PM.
Old 02-09-2016, 09:59 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

No chance whatsoever that a Fast intake gives that much power
Old 02-09-2016, 10:03 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

What are the actual cam specs? The lift isn't nearly as important as duration and lsa which will determine valve events. The cam could have the same lift but one could have 2* overlap and the other 12* overlap which will make an insane difference in power.

A truck intake is similar in power to a ls6 car intake...it is not on par with a Fast intake even on a stock engine. An unported Fast would be at least 10rwhp over a ls6 intake on a bone stock engine and will get more with porting or on a cammed engine.

Not sure what elevation you race at but if your car is really that light then your times seem slow to me for a cammed and bolt on 6.0l


My car went over 88mph in the 1/8th at near 3800lbs with a cam/bolt on ls1. 230/224 XE lobed Comp Cam, longtubes, Fast 90mm, and underdrive pulley through a 4l60e with Yank SS3600 and 3.42 12 bolt rear.
Old 02-09-2016, 10:08 AM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
elephantrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: round rock tx
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

agree - with just a intake change to a fast, no way your getting 60hp.
Old 02-09-2016, 10:16 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
foxsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 578
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
What are the actual cam specs? The lift isn't nearly as important as duration and lsa which will determine valve events. The cam could have the same lift but one could have 2* overlap and the other 12* overlap which will make an insane difference in power.

A truck intake is similar in power to a ls6 car intake...it is not on par with a Fast intake even on a stock engine. An unported Fast would be at least 10rwhp over a ls6 intake on a bone stock engine and will get more with porting or on a cammed engine.

Not sure what elevation you race at but if your car is really that light then your times seem slow to me for a cammed and bolt on 6.0l


My car went over 88mph in the 1/8th at near 3800lbs with a cam/bolt on ls1. 230/224 XE lobed Comp Cam, longtubes, Fast 90mm, and underdrive pulley through a 4l60e with Yank SS3600 and 3.42 12 bolt rear.
Neither of us are cammed (but it seems he might be). Stock lq4 cam (196/207 duration, .467/.479 lift) same as his year of ls1. Mine is a 1990 foxbody notchback and yes I weighed it, 3064 lbs, 3229 lbs with me in it.

I don't have headers just stock manifolds, catless 2.5inch duals
Old 02-09-2016, 10:17 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

A FAST 102mm wouldn't even do that. Also, what is "chp"?
Old 02-09-2016, 10:19 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
foxsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 578
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
A FAST 102mm wouldn't even do that. Also, what is "chp"?
Exactly, that's why I'm confused. Crank horsepower
Old 02-09-2016, 10:20 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Gotcha.
Old 02-09-2016, 10:26 AM
  #9  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (4)
 
LSX Power Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Brenham TX
Posts: 2,367
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Your not comparing apples to apples in your setup vs his. To many variables between the two to try to single out a single component like an intake. You would also need to compare both time slips and see if the 60 is the same vs just comparing et.
Old 02-09-2016, 10:29 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
foxsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 578
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LSX Power Tuning
Your not comparing apples to apples in your setup vs his. To many variables between the two to try to single out a single component like an intake. You would also need to compare both time slips and see if the 60 is the same vs just comparing et.
I'll try to track down his track info
Old 02-09-2016, 10:48 AM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

ohhh I see

7.3 in the 1/8th with a stock cam ls1 and a 3500rpm launch? Did you see this happen because that doesn't even sound possible. If so has it repeated the run to rule out a glitched timing slip?

running 7.25@94mph 1/8th I went 11.46@116 1/4 on a 1.61 60ft

I say he's heads/cam or spraying.
Old 02-09-2016, 10:55 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
foxsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 578
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
ohhh I see

7.3 in the 1/8th with a stock cam ls1 and a 3500rpm launch? Did you see this happen because that doesn't even sound possible. If so has it repeated the run to rule out a glitched timing slip?

running 7.25@94mph 1/8th I went 11.46@116 1/4 on a 1.61 60ft

I say he's heads/cam or spraying.
Haha that's why I've been scratching my head like curious George.
Here is all the info he mentioned on his times:

7.36@95 mph in the 1/8th mile
2002 ws6 ls1, stock heads and cam, no spray, DA was 2550, 1.68 60 foot,
1 7/8" headers, x pipe duals, reving to 6400 rpm
He says his secret is "lightweight, especially in clutch and balancer"
Has innovators west pulley and electric water pump.
And sorry it's a "ported fast 92, 85mm descreened truck maf, full 90 mm full intake tract"
Old 02-09-2016, 12:00 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
foxsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 578
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LSX Power Tuning
Your not comparing apples to apples in your setup vs his. To many variables between the two to try to single out a single component like an intake. You would also need to compare both time slips and see if the 60 is the same vs just comparing et.
Forget about me completely then and just look at his mods, it being a 2002 ws6, and his times (7.36@95mph, 1.68 60 foot).
I was using my car as a reference, my 60 foot is 1.67.
Old 02-09-2016, 12:03 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
foxsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 578
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
ohhh I see

7.3 in the 1/8th with a stock cam ls1 and a 3500rpm launch? Did you see this happen because that doesn't even sound possible. If so has it repeated the run to rule out a glitched timing slip?

running 7.25@94mph 1/8th I went 11.46@116 1/4 on a 1.61 60ft

I say he's heads/cam or spraying.
I wasn't there nor did I see a time slip, just taking his word on it . I've never met the guy, this was over Facebook on a local group.
Old 02-09-2016, 12:41 PM
  #15  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (4)
 
LSX Power Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Brenham TX
Posts: 2,367
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by foxsl
Forget about me completely then and just look at his mods, it being a 2002 ws6, and his times (7.36@95mph, 1.68 60 foot).
I was using my car as a reference, my 60 foot is 1.67.
Looking at just his time it doesnt add up for his mods IMO not with that 60ft.
Old 02-09-2016, 12:49 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

He's full of **** or his car has things done he doesn't know about. I don't even see that car realistically running low 12s in that DA, much less mid 11s.
Old 02-09-2016, 01:10 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
 
nmass399's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hattiesburg, Ms
Posts: 1,244
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Won't see that kind of power from just an intake unless it had an ls1 intake on it and even then that's a stretch. That's a lot of mph in that da for a stock internal setup.
Old 02-09-2016, 01:48 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
foxsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 578
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Ya guys we are all equally seeing something not adding up here.
If he is honest then he must not be the original owner as the previous owner either cammed it, swapped in an ls6, or did some headwork.
Old 02-09-2016, 02:08 PM
  #19  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (4)
 
LSX Power Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Brenham TX
Posts: 2,367
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by foxsl
Ya guys we are all equally seeing something not adding up here.
If he is honest then he must not be the original owner as the previous owner either cammed it, swapped in an ls6, or did some headwork.
Had that actually happen to a customer, bought used bolt on camaro and it ran way faster than it should. After alot of digging, at some point one of the previous owners swapped in ls6 with a sleeper cam and it was disclosed when sold.
Old 02-09-2016, 03:09 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Jtm2085's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

It sounds like you are talking about bighammer's car


Quick Reply: guy claiming ~60 chp gain on ls1 with fast 90



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.