Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

160 deg. thermostat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2005, 06:17 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
jims ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 160 deg. thermostat

If I add the 160 degree thermostat to my 2000 ss. Should I?, Could I? do something to have the fan come on earlier than the (what is it? 210 degrees) that it would under normal circumstances , and no I wasnt planning on buying a programmer just to get my engine running cooler. Thanks for your help.
Old 01-20-2005, 06:26 PM
  #2  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,486 Likes on 1,069 Posts

Default

If you add the 160 without fan tuning, the motor will only run cooler at higher speeds when you have air being forced across the radiator. At idle/in traffic/slow speeds, the car will not run any cooler with just the stat, you need to cut the fans on sooner with tuning or get a manual fan switch.
Old 01-20-2005, 09:14 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Flawless02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canon, GA
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

If you dont want to buy a programmer, you can go toa camaro performance shop and they will do it for like $50. I think Fender's gangs does it by mail, check them out to see. www.fbodymotorsports.com
Old 01-20-2005, 09:16 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
 
LS1Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Everyone I have talked to has told me the 160* thermo isn't worth it. There was a thread not even two days ago discussing this. If it was just a $5 thermo like in normal cars I'd say knock yourself out but since it costs upwards of $50 to put one on an LS1 I say spend your money on something else.

http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...&vid=3&pcid=81
Old 01-20-2005, 11:43 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Blacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The 160* Thermostat helped me especially in the summer. The 180* is not worth it and runs close to stock.
Old 01-20-2005, 11:50 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
RahuL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Lightbulb

Originally Posted by LS1Maniac
Everyone I have talked to has told me the 160* thermo isn't worth it. There was a thread not even two days ago discussing this. If it was just a $5 thermo like in normal cars I'd say knock yourself out but since it costs upwards of $50 to put one on an LS1 I say spend your money on something else.

http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...&vid=3&pcid=81
I'm dunno.. my car runs around ~ 168 every since the 160* Stat and tuning [ fan 1 @ 168* and 2nd @ 172* ]

I agree with the $50 price tag being excessive for a thermo.. But, if it'll prevent from loosing HP [ hot motor = loss of HP, KR etc.. ] .. it's worth it..

Plus, running a cooler engine [ I understand the engine HAS to run at a certain min temp. for optimum performance and reliability ] might, and probably does, cause less wear and tear..
Old 01-20-2005, 11:54 PM
  #7  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,486 Likes on 1,069 Posts

Default

LS1s don't need to run at 16X to make their best power. Actually, most have found their dyno numbers and trap speeds to be higher with opperating temps in the 19X to low 20X range. I know mine was.....
Old 01-21-2005, 02:50 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Blacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Even with the 160* T-Stat, my car runs ~182* on the highway.
Old 01-21-2005, 07:01 AM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
CamTom12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The temp. rating on the thermostats is where they start to open. It's not the temp where your car will run, especially in town. You can add a shim to help it open earlier, I think it's worth another 10*, but I would just leave the stock 180 in there. LS1s actually like a bit of heat...
Old 01-21-2005, 12:55 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
SmokingWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Higher dyno numbers with a hotter tstat might be due to a stock pcm running leaner at higher temps. That can be corrected with tuning. Personally I ran my best 1/4 times with the 160. I only replaced it since the stock tstat gasket broke or else I never would of bothered. I have my low fan set around 180 and high at 190. During the summer the low fan runs non stop after it gets up to temp, helps keep temps constant and transmission temps down.
Old 01-21-2005, 02:01 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
 
Another_User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

98s need the Spark vs. ECT table adjusted or you will get timing pulled with a low-temp stat.
Old 01-21-2005, 02:30 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
matts22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So basically, the consensus is that if you can tune the car easily to add more timing, the 160 degree stat is good?
Old 01-21-2005, 05:25 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
 
Another_User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by matts22
So basically, the consensus is that if you can tune the car easily to add more timing, the 160 degree stat is good?
Correct.
Old 01-21-2005, 05:44 PM
  #14  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,486 Likes on 1,069 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Another_User
98s need the Spark vs. ECT table adjusted or you will get timing pulled with a low-temp stat.
How cold do the ECT readings need to be for this to be an issue?
Old 01-21-2005, 07:15 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
 
Another_User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
How cold do the ECT readings need to be for this to be an issue?
I think as high as 176 or something. I will look later.
Old 01-21-2005, 07:39 PM
  #16  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,486 Likes on 1,069 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Another_User
I think as high as 176 or something. I will look later.
So timing is lower at 176F and below on '98s? I know "at or above" 176F is referanced a few times in the tech manuals for performing certain tests so that makes sense.....
Old 01-21-2005, 11:18 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
matts22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Another_User
Correct.
Is this only for '98s or for all f-bodies?
Old 01-22-2005, 10:25 AM
  #18  
TECH Addict
 
Another_User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by matts22
Is this only for '98s or for all f-bodies?
I think they changed it on later years. In fact, the table shows up differently in the later years PCMs. I know most later years this does not apply. I still need to break out my laptop to give you solid numbers though.
Old 03-13-2005, 09:16 AM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 3,964
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

AnotherUser: Did you find anything on this table? I've got a 160 and I don't believe I've messed with this table at all. What are the recommended values for the table?
Old 03-13-2005, 10:14 AM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Cahill93Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 589
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

i'll be putting in a 160 stat, and redline water wetter this week




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 AM.