LS2 vs LS6 intake, LS6 wins

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

01-31-2005, 09:03 PM

FAST LS1

TECH Fanatic

Thread Starter

iTrader: (2)

Join Date: Jun 2002

Location: Athens TN

Posts: 1,057

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

LS2 vs LS6 intake, LS6 wins

http://www.gearchatter.com/viewtopic11052.php

Reply Like

01-31-2005, 09:10 PM

99HUGGSS

On The Tree

Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: OKC

Posts: 141

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Holy Crap!!!!!

Reply Like

01-31-2005, 09:15 PM

Redlinez

TECH Addict

iTrader: (5)

Join Date: Jan 2003

Location: Fuquay-Varina, NC

Posts: 2,298

Likes: 1

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I believe Squintzpallatore could shed some light on this. He ran the ls2 intake on his h/c ls1 and lost power I think.

Reply Like

02-01-2005, 07:19 AM

WILWAXU

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (6)

Join Date: Nov 2001

Location: League City, TX

Posts: 14,378

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Good information, but seems to me that those result could be scewed by tuning. Not to mention they cut the RPM's at 6200, giving the advantage to the smaller intake IMO.

Reply Like

02-01-2005, 02:57 PM

Redlinez

TECH Addict

iTrader: (5)

Join Date: Jan 2003

Location: Fuquay-Varina, NC

Posts: 2,298

Likes: 1

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

What's up Chief!! He said he thought it would shine more appropriately on 408 plus cubes.

Reply Like

02-01-2005, 05:39 PM

Squintz Palladoris

11 Second Club

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Sep 2003

Location: Fayettenam, North Cakalki

Posts: 1,252

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I HATE That Intake.

It probably would do well on a larger cid motor.
The FAST 90mm Intake made 20rwhp/21rwtq more on my combo than the LS2.
I lost 5 mph in the 1/4 and slowed down .5 with the LS2 vs the LS6.

All of these were tuned. Lets not get into this again. I will find the link so you know what I mean.

Brad