Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

No 93 Octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2005, 06:06 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
noah89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago; South Side
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default No 93 Octane

Listening to the nightly news, there was an article suggesting that 93 octane fuel may not be available due to the hurricance. Given the extreme circumstances I'll never complain. Can we run on 92 octane with little performance loss. What if you running heads and cam?
Old 08-31-2005, 06:13 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Redneck Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The majority of california only has 91 octane.
Old 08-31-2005, 06:56 PM
  #3  
SSU's Drunk Typing Whore
iTrader: (47)
 
Lithium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Redneck Z
The majority of california only has 91 octane.
Old 08-31-2005, 06:58 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
GTObsessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yep. It SUCKS to be a Californian... but the Hurricane victims have it MUCH worse.
Old 08-31-2005, 07:36 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
WILWAXU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 14,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I run the junk 91 california gas with a bottle of octane booster in my car to keep it from pinging. On the east coast I was able to run straight 93 octane without issue.
Old 08-31-2005, 08:12 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Out1aw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Theres a guy near me that has a 95 Trans Am that only uses regular 87 octane... seems to run fine for him, but I would NEVER do that in an LT1/Ls1... or any high performance vehicle for that matter.
Old 08-31-2005, 08:33 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Camaro99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The engineers who design an engine to run on premium gas use 91 as their number because it's the lowest "premium" out there. When my car was running lean (14.5/1) with the first tune, I only noticed slight pinging off and on at 4500 rpm. I attribute that to the 93 octane we have here with none of the crap additives some states require for cleaner emissions.

Jason
Old 08-31-2005, 08:34 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Camaro99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Oops, double post.

Jason
Old 08-31-2005, 09:00 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
spy2520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,513
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the manual says 91 is the recommended minimum, if that matters any.
Old 08-31-2005, 10:43 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Z28LS1camaroguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just use some octane booster and that will fix that little problem.
Old 08-31-2005, 11:25 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
dlandsvZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 99 Likes on 80 Posts

Default

Ounce for ounce Torco is much cheaper that some of the octance boosters that cost $5-6 a can. Torco raises the octane in real points (full points rather than 1/10's of a point).

A 1/4 can of Torco should easily get a tank of 91 up to 94 (that's about $3 or 25 cents a gallon for a 12 gallon fill).

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/arch.../t-420798.html

http://www.need4speedpower.com/torco.html
Old 09-01-2005, 02:05 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
 
94formulabird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: KCMO
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I ran my old car on 87 all the time, and there was no difference. NONE AT ALL
Old 09-01-2005, 02:32 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Redneck Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The LS1 was tuned to run on premium gas. Your car runs 28 degrees timing from the factory. If you don't want to spend money to buy the kind of gas your car was designed to run on/needs, then maybe you need a honda. Ping is not always audible either. Your car is a V8 not a VTEC!
Old 09-01-2005, 04:35 PM
  #14  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
BigE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alabama - The 'Ham
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Torco turns 93 octane into (as much as) 104 octane? If that's true of one 32 oz bottle, the "concentrate" would have to be somewhere in the neighborhood of 550 octane in order to accomplish a 104 octane result with only 10 gallons of 93. I don't see that happening. Plus, it's 13 bucks per 32 oz bottle; that's half of a tank of 93. Doesn't smell right to me.
Old 09-01-2005, 05:14 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
ddelallata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brownsville, Tx
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

93 octane my ***. I've been running on 87 for a couple of years already with no problems.
Old 09-01-2005, 05:50 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Redneck Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It's a horrible idea to run 87 octane in a 10.1 LS1 motor. Yeah, I've been standing on one leg, drunk, on top of a skyscraper for 2 days now with no problems.
Old 09-01-2005, 06:28 PM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
Phoenix 5.7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Prairie de Femme, LA
Posts: 3,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

our cars are designed to run on 91/93, but it won't necessarily hurt it to run on 87 or 89. the car will just remove timing to compensate. our books say permium for best performance
Old 09-01-2005, 06:41 PM
  #18  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Redneck Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't understand why you would use 87 octane and run around on the low octane fuel table? Talk about a buzz kill. I know gas prices suck, but that is what honda's are for.
Old 09-01-2005, 06:48 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
Phoenix 5.7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Prairie de Femme, LA
Posts: 3,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the S2000 has to use premium due to its high compression
Old 09-01-2005, 10:28 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
 
dlandsvZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 99 Likes on 80 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BigE
Torco turns 93 octane into (as much as) 104 octane? If that's true of one 32 oz bottle, the "concentrate" would have to be somewhere in the neighborhood of 550 octane in order to accomplish a 104 octane result with only 10 gallons of 93. I don't see that happening. Plus, it's 13 bucks per 32 oz bottle; that's half of a tank of 93. Doesn't smell right to me.

You might to read through this thread. Somewhere in the thread th octane is calculcated to be 530. I'm convinced this stuff works and costs out as I calculated in a previous post if you want to raise octane from 91 t0 93.

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/arch.../t-420798.html

This quote is from the same thread.

"Here is a test that one magazine did on the Torco Accelerator added to 94 octane gas against 114 octane race gas. Even though the race gas made more HP, it was only 10 HP more and at twice the price according to the article.

The instrutions they had on the bottle say:

For 97 octane, treat 20 gallons of 93
For 104 add 2 cans to 20 gallons

They had a 15 gallon tank and used 2 cans in it to make a estimated 105-106 octane.

http://server6.uploadit.org/files/rankink-chart_2.jpg

http://server6.uploadit.org/files/rankink-chart_1.jpg

If anyone wanted to know what the test car was, a 87 mustang with the following mods: 306 using R 302 block, AFR 185 heads, X-303 camshaft, 75 lb injectors, victor 5.0 intake, Western motorsports DFI, Paxton Novi making 21 lbs of boost, spearco air-to-air intercooler, and full exhaust."

Last edited by dlandsvZ28; 09-01-2005 at 10:38 PM.


Quick Reply: No 93 Octane



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM.