Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

which kooks headers 1-3/4 or 1-7/8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2005, 12:15 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
02blkws6vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default which kooks headers 1-3/4 or 1-7/8?

which should i get if i get these kind? i have a 02 m6 trans am what are the pros and cons of both and would there be any noticeable hp gains from one of the other
Old 10-17-2005, 12:25 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
ssheets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gardnerville, NV.
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was told 1-3/4 for stock displacement, 1-7/8 for bigger cubes
Old 10-17-2005, 06:24 AM
  #3  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

1 3/4 until you go pretty radical (ie: big cubes like ssheets mentioned). Even stock displacement heads/cam engines don't seem to like the larger primarys from what I've experienced and seen.
Old 10-17-2005, 07:10 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,645
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by from the STICKY
Header Basics by Loren Barnes, President, S&S Headers, Inc.

You have probably heard words like: back pressure, scavenging, tuned length, merged collector, rotational firing order, compatible combination and many others that meant something, but how they relate to a header may be a little vague. This article should give you a basic understanding of how a header works, what the terminology means, and how it plays a part in the header's performance gains.

The first misconception that needs to be cleared up is that a header relieves backpressure, but a certain amount of backpressure is needed for optimum performance. Just the opposite is true. A good header not only relieves the backpressure, but goes one step further and creates a vacuum in the system. When the next cylinder's exhaust valve opens, the vacuum in the system pulls the exhaust out of the cylinder. This is what the term "Scavenging" means.

The first consideration is the proper tube diameter. Many people think "Bigger is Better", but this is not the case. The smallest diameter that will flow enough air to handle the engine's c.c. at your desired Red Line R.P.M. should be used. This small diameter will generate the velocity (air speed) needed to "Scavenge" at low R.P.M.s. If too small a diameter is used the engine will pull hard at low R.P.M.s but at some point in the higher R.P.M.s the tube will not be able to flow as much air as the engine is pumping out, and the engine will "sign off" early, not reaching its potential peak R.P.M. This situation would require going one size larger in tube diameter.

The second consideration is the proper tube length. The length directly controls the power band in the R.P.M. range. Longer tube lengths pull the torque down to a lower R.P.M. range. Shorter tubes move the power band up into a higher R.P.M. range. Engines that Red Line at 10,000 R.P.M. would need short tube lengths about 26" long. Engines that are torquers and Red Line at 5,500 R.P.M.s would need a tube length of 36". This is what is meant by the term "Tuned Length". The tube length is tuned to make the engine operate at a desired R.P.M. range.

The third consideration is the collector outlet diameter and extension length. This is where major differences occur between four cylinder engines and V-8 engines. The optimum situation is the four cylinder because of it's firing cycle. Every 180 degree of crankshaft rotation there is one exhaust pulse entering the collector. This is ideal timing because, as one pulse exits the collector, the next exhaust valve is opening and the vacuum created in the system pulls the exhaust from the cylinder. In this ideal 180 degree cycling the collector outlet diameter only needs to be 20% larger than the primary tube diameter. (Example: 1 3/4" primary tubes need a 2" collector outlet diameter.) The rule of thumb here is two tube sizes. This keeps the velocity fast to increase scavenging, especially at lower R.P.M.s. Going to a larger outlet diameter will hurt the midrange and low R.P.M. torque.

The amount of straight in the collector extension can move the engines torque up or down in the R.P.M. range. Longer extension length will pull the torque down into the midrange.

Engines that "Red Line" at 10,000 R.P.M. would only need 2" of straight between the collector and the megaphone. This is just enough length to straighten out the air flow before it enters the megaphone. This creates an orifice action that enhances exhaust velocity.

In the case of V-8 firing order, the five pulses fire alternately back and forth from left to right collector, giving the ideal 180 degree firing cycle. Then it fires two in succession into the left collector, then two in succession into the right collector. If the proper collector outlet diameter is being used (two sizes larger than primaries) the two pulses in succession load up the collector with more air than it can flow. This results in a very strong midrange torque, but causes the engine to "sign off" early, not reaching its potential peek R.P.M. The improper firing order on a V-8 engine results in the need to use large diameter collectors so the engine will perform well at high R.P.M.s. Unfortunately the large diameter collectors cause a tremendous drop in air velocity, resulting in less scavenging through the entire R.P.M. range.

Often cams are used with extended valve timing to help the exhaust cycling. This results in valve timing overlap (Intake and Exhaust valves both open at T.D.C.) which causes a "Reversion"cycle in the exhaust. When this happens, exhaust actually backs up into the cylinder causing intake air to be pushed back out the intake. This reversion causes "Standoff" (fuel blowing out of the Intake) at low R.P.M.s. This whole improper cycling has resulted in a number of "Cure Alls" to help stop this reversion and standoff.

The plentum intake was created to stop the fuel "Standoff". Then came "Anti Reversionary" Cones in the exhaust tubes, and stepped tube diameter in the header, extended collector lengths and even plentums in the exhaust tubes.

In this chain of events beginning with improper firing order, a series of cures has developed, each one causing a new problem.

The optimum cure to this whole problem is to correct the exhaust firing cycle. The two cylinders that fire in succession into each collector have to be separated. This can be done partially by a "Tri-Y" header, where the four primary tubes from each bank merge into two secondary tubes (separating the two pulses firing in succession) and finally collect into a single collector. This type of header helps, but the two pulses are still coming back together at the collector.

The second optimum cure is to cross the two center tubes from each bank, across the engine running them into the collector on the opposite side. This makes the firing cycle in each collector 180 degrees apart, the same as a four cylinder engine. Once this firing order is achieved, the small collector outlet diameter can be used and the "High Velocity Scavenging" at low R.P.M.s cures the reversion problems and eliminates the need for extreme cam duration.

This sounds so easy, you are probably asking why wasn't this done from the start?

If you have ever seen a set of 180 degree headers you would understand.

On today's cars, with space virtually nonexistent, crossing four tubes either under the oil pan or around the front or rear of the engine presents major problems. On racing applications where it is possible, there is still the problem of keeping the tube length down to a reasonable 32" long. If that's not enough challenge, then try to arrange the tubes into each collector so they fire in a "Rotational Firing" pattern. Then you have, what has been called "A Bundle of Snakes".

Arranging the tubes to fire rotationally adds to the scavenging capabilities. The exhaust gas exiting one tube, passing across the opening of the tube directly beside it, creates more suction on that tube than it would on a tube on the opposite side of the collector.

The next problem is "Turbulence" in the collector. When four round tubes are grouped together in a square pattern, so a collector can be attached, you notice a gapping hole in the center of the four tubes. The standard method in manufacturing headers is to cap this hole off with a square plate. This plate in the center of the four tubes creates dead air space, or turbulence, disrupting the high velocity in the collector. This problem is solved by using a "Merge Collector". This collector is formed from four tubes, cut at approximately an 8 degree angle on two sides. When the tubes are all fitted together they form a collector with a "Pyramid" in the center. This has eliminated the need for the square plate and has taken up some of the volume inside the collector, speeding up the air velocity.

Other methods of curing this problem are: fabricating a pyramid out of sheet metal and welding it over the hole between the tubes, or squaring the tubes on two sides so they fit together forming a "+" weld in the center eliminating the hole all together.

You can see that there are a great many factors that go into making a good header. When the header, intake system, and cam timing are all designed to operate to their maximum in the same R.P.M. range, then you have a "Compatible Combination". This combination can be tuned to deliver maximum power at any desired R.P.M. range.

These are some of the "Basics" you need to know about building a good high performance header. There are many other adjustments that can be made to fine tune a header, but this should give you a basic understanding of how all the components work together.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by jrp : 05-29-2005 at 12:20 AM.

jrp
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jrp
Send email to jrp
Visit jrp's homepage!
Find More Posts by jrp
Add jrp to Your Buddy List

09-06-2004, 11:34 AM #7
jrp
Search Button Director




Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 10,037
Trader Rating: (2)


These three circles illustrate the difference in internal square-inch area between 2.25-, 2.50-, and 3-inch exhaust pipes. We’ve calculated the area based on a wall thickness of 0.065. The 2.25-inch pipe has a flow area of 3.80 square inches, a 2.5-inch system increases the area 25 percent to 4.7 square inches, and a 3-inch pipe pumps the area up to 6.8 square inches.
There's plenty more info in the STICKY, it should answer nearly all of your exhaust/header questions, if not it will at least give you a good grounding to make your own decision.
Old 10-17-2005, 08:58 AM
  #5  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Kooks 1 3/4" here!
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 10-17-2005, 09:53 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Tirefire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: El Paso, Tx
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I went with a 1 3/4 stepped to 1 7/8 kooks header. All stock..
Old 10-17-2005, 10:54 AM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
 
KILLERARMY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Raleigh,NC
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

1 3/4 x 1 7/8 x 3

1 3/4 x 1 7/8 x 3 1/2

Can you place this 2 headers on a stock engine for now,and then later a big cam. Kooks carries 2 different kind of headers.
Old 10-17-2005, 11:05 AM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
ZL1Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

gotta luv my kooks gains in sig
Old 10-17-2005, 11:05 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
ZEEMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: HOT-LANTA
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went with 1 7/8. They were a better price and have been tested back to back against 1 3/4 on a stock engine and no gain or loss was detected. I got them beacuse i would rather grow into them instaed of out. I plan on goin with a hefty cam and some big heads in the future. If i ever go stroker motor or FI i wont have to get new headers.
Old 10-17-2005, 11:12 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
DanO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZEEMAN
I went with 1 7/8. They were a better price and have been tested back to back against 1 3/4 on a stock engine and no gain or loss was detected. I got them beacuse i would rather grow into them instaed of out. I plan on goin with a hefty cam and some big heads in the future. If i ever go stroker motor or FI i wont have to get new headers.

This is exactly what i did. I know i will sacrifice some Tq for now... but it'll save me $$ by not having to buy headers again when i get my 402 shortblock.

Not to mention they arent cheap to begin with... and i got the ceramic coating! Damn $$... oh well, if you want the best you gotta pay for it..lol
Old 10-17-2005, 11:16 AM
  #11  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
ZL1Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

why go to ceramic....stainless will look so much better over time and never have to worry about a thing...my previous ceramic coated headers cracked and turned colors...not too pretty. but whatever you want is whatever you want

got my kooks 1 3/4 from More Performance and i luv em
Old 10-17-2005, 11:51 AM
  #12  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

1 3/4" on 346ci. is the way to go, even on heads/cam setups.
Old 10-17-2005, 11:56 AM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
02SOMWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wallkill ,NY
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I just ordered a set of 1"&3/4 stepped to 1"&7/8. I paln on spraying so I shold be able to take advantage of the size
Old 10-17-2005, 08:58 PM
  #14  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
02blkws6vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

are there ones that are just 1-3/4 and ones that are 1-3/4 stepped to 1-7/8 should i just get the 1-3/4 not the stepped ones
Old 10-17-2005, 09:04 PM
  #15  
Banned
iTrader: (14)
 
joblo1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

1 3/4 for stock and mild cam setups
1 3/4 with 1 7/8 step for mild head and cam and N20 cars
1 7/8 for big head and cam, big n20, and high boost engines.

Whoever just copied and pasted that huge unnecessary post didn't even answer your question, !
Old 10-17-2005, 09:12 PM
  #16  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Steve C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im running 1 3/4in FLP Long tubes with stock displacement....no problems or complaints here
Old 10-17-2005, 10:56 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
SUX2BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 3,267
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

my friend gained 10 rwhp switching from 1 3/4 to 1 7/8 on a cam only car.
Old 10-18-2005, 12:20 AM
  #18  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
02blkws6vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok since my car is fairly stock but i do plan on getting a mild cam someday should i just get the 1-3/4 stepped 1-7/8 headers?
Old 10-18-2005, 12:22 AM
  #19  
Banned
iTrader: (14)
 
joblo1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02blkws6vert
ok since my car is fairly stock but i do plan on getting a mild cam someday should i just get the 1-3/4 stepped 1-7/8 headers?
Unless you're ever going to go with heads and or nitrous, I would just go with the 1 3/4.
Old 10-18-2005, 07:03 AM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

How is the clearance with the steering shaft and ground for those of you with the 1 7/8?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 PM.