Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Opinions on these two setups for my LS2 402

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2005, 10:18 AM
  #1  
Super Hulk Smash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default Opinions on these two setups for my LS2 402

I have a T/A, so I want tailpipes. It's lowered about 1.75" and setup for road racing, so ground clearance is a concern on the street. I will have a 530rwhp ish LS2 402 in soon enough, and I need to keep an exhaust on when I'm racing (and on the street), so cut-outs are not really what I'm after, but I don't want to choke out 20-30rwhp because of a horrid cat-back exhaust.

So, I know I'll have to go with a Y-Pipe for ground clearance, but which of these combos would make the best power? Also, I know the Kooks will tuck better, but am I giving up power vs the QTP combo below? If I'm going to give up ground clearance for the QTP ORY, I would like to run a 3.5 or 4" Mufflex exhaust to not choke out the 402. Therefore, I think I can overlook an inch less ground clearance if it's good for 15rwhp. Unless, something like a Magnaflow exhaust will outflow either GMMG or Mufflex.

Which one would you choose?

Option 1: Kooks 1-7/8" Headers, Kooks 3" ORY, GMMG Exhaust with Oval Tips

Option 2: QTP 1-7/8" HVMC Headers, QTP 4" ORY, Mufflex 4" Exhaust with Spintech Muffler

Option 3: Either one of the above, but with Magnaflow. Reason for Kooks over QTP (ground clearance, negligible power difference, price? and yes, I know I said two options, but this is really a half an option)

I could see myself going with either one and being happy, but what do you guys think?
Old 11-10-2005, 10:48 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
OldeSkool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Get whichever headers you can get the best deal on. 1 7/8 Kooks would be my choice. Then have a custom y-pipe made that merges into either the Mufflex 3.5, the stainlessworks 3.5 or the mufflex 4 inch exhaust.
Old 11-10-2005, 11:45 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
thunderstruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: effingham, il
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i know this isnt one of your options, but i wouldnt rule out true duals cause of clearance issues. if done correctly you can have just as much clearance as a y-pipe setup.
Old 11-10-2005, 12:29 PM
  #4  
Super Hulk Smash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

I've ruled out duals simply because I'm going to order a tunnel mounted torque arm.

That's why I'm torn on this decision. True duals would be the obvious answer, but ugh.
Old 11-10-2005, 12:49 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
thunderstruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: effingham, il
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yeah that does limit you. is the alston torque arm still available? i believe that will work with true duals, but not sure on clearance
Old 11-10-2005, 12:59 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
 
dailydriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bucks County, Pa.
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would go with whichever header (the QTPs look cooler with the NASCAR collector, but power gains are minimal at best), a custom y pipe (I'm close enough to Mufflex to have them make me one) with the best merge possible and best clearances, into a Mufflex 4" (3.5" would be a possibility, but they don't offer it in stainless) system with either a Magnaflow, or preferably an XR1 (if you can handle the noise) and dual outlets with big rectangular (or oval) tips. All of the above preferably in 304 stainless, of course.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM.