Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Maf?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2006, 07:32 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (70)
 
KilerTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: OHIO
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Maf?

If i get a ported and TB do i would it be best to de screen my MAF for it to breath better or could i just leave it be? and if i descreen the MAF will i throw a SES light?
Old 02-27-2006, 07:42 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,645
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Big debate this, lol. You have been warned.

Essentailly de-screening the MAF will make bugger all HP. Yes some see it as a restriction but at the end of the day it's only going to be minor at best.

Many poeple have also had issues with descreening the MAF, poor idle and a big drop in mpg. This has little to do with removing a restriction. The screen creates a Laminar flow over the MAF sensors to get an accurate reading.

But just to add confusion, there are also many people who have removed it and had no problems at all.

Personally I beleive any gain to be small (as in not noticable in SOTP, ET or trap speed) or just non existant. So I see no reason to spend time removing it, espeically when it may cause issues.

FRA, throttle bump stop and ported TB are all worth while mods.

TB by-pass is only worth doing if you have an aftermarket TB which doesn't cater for it, as it's designed to give you better cruise economy and will have little or no affect on WOT (wide open throttle) performance.

AIR & EGR do not affect bhp at all, so the only reason to remove them is engine bay looks and cheaper headers, LS6 intake manifold swap.

This is all IMO so take it for what it's worth
Old 02-27-2006, 11:17 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Flawless02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canon, GA
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Probably not worth the trouble. Mine is descreened though and no problems here.
Old 02-28-2006, 05:41 AM
  #4  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Flawless02SS
Probably not worth the trouble. Mine is descreened though and no problems here.
Same here, you really never know what you will get.
Old 02-28-2006, 06:14 AM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Frosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Near Philly,PA
Posts: 1,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I wouldn't do it. The possible benefits don't outweight the potential risks. I know people that do it to EVERY car they get and haven't had problems yet I know people that have had nightmares after doing it.

What's it worth? 2hp? Sure every little bit counts but when your car idles like **** and doesn't run worth a damn is that 2hp really worth it? Is it also worth having to drop $75+ on a new/used MAF if the descreened one doesn't work out for you?

Just some food for thought
Old 02-28-2006, 06:21 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Justin00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I know my descreened stock maf runs alot better in my car than the granatelli maf that didn't come with any screen.

stock w/ descreen = ~20mpg
granatell maf = ~9mpg
Old 02-28-2006, 07:23 AM
  #7  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

hit or miss basically is the prognosis of this thread so far.
Old 02-28-2006, 07:25 AM
  #8  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Justin00SS
stock w/ descreen = ~20mpg
granatell maf = ~9mpg
Are you freaking kidding me? what other mods did you have at the time and how rich was that thing running?
Old 02-28-2006, 07:33 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Justin00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
Are you freaking kidding me? what other mods did you have at the time and how rich was that thing running?
I have a hypertech tuner and tuned it with that.

I literally got like 60miles to a half tank. I was like omg. LS1s sucks teh ballz!!!

Then a guy at phfba.net said that I might have a fuel leak. Then I mentioned the granatelli maf and he advised me to take it off until I get to like 600hp and then put it back on. I took it off put the stock one on and bam!

Added 10-12 mpg.

I have a whisper lid, magnaflow catback, and hypertech tune for performance.

Some kind of RFG thing. I dunno. I programmed the stock calibration into the computer and drove around then programmed in the hypertech thing and the car feels like it has more spunk or get up. Not really faster or anthing just more. I dunno. May be my head.

Superchevy said just that tune alone is worth 12rwhp on an all stock engine with their dyno so.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 AM.