Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3in duals vs 3 1/2in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2006, 03:47 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 3in duals vs 3 1/2in

Going with a dual setup... using no mufflers and no cats.

My headers have 3 1/2 inch primaries and i plan to run 3 1/2in piping into the X and then dump it right after.

This is going on a car that makes roughly 800whp. I read that 3inch duals can only support rougly around 800-900whp, is this true?

I want maximum gains out of this. I have not seen a picture of 3 1/2 duals before.. but my floorboards have already been clearanced.
Old 04-26-2006, 04:27 PM
  #2  
SSU's Drunk Typing Whore
iTrader: (47)
 
Lithium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I believe 3" becomes restrictive around there...I would most likely go with 3.5 in.
Old 04-26-2006, 04:40 PM
  #3  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SiL3NtXWS6

I want maximum gains out of this. I have not seen a picture of 3 1/2 duals before.. but my floorboards have already been clearanced.
You must be in the 40X+ cubes. Decide on your exhaust N/A unless this is a track car and rarely sees the street. If it is a full on race car then dual exhaust probably isnt the best idea for monster power. You probably don't see 3.5" duals because they won't fit unless you go with the BFH method on the underside of the car.
Old 04-26-2006, 04:41 PM
  #4  
SSU's Drunk Typing Whore
iTrader: (47)
 
Lithium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yea, and what he said.
Old 04-26-2006, 06:02 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It's not a track car but it's not a daily driver.

I use this car for street racing and track racing with some occasional stops in between.

So, you guys think i wouldn't notice a difference in power between 3 1/2in and 3in at ~560whp N/A?
Old 04-27-2006, 10:24 AM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
baldurann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kingwood, TX
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Go with 3.5", you *****. Like I told you and told you, Dr. Gas 3.5" X-pipe! CAUSE THATS HOW WE ROLL DOWN IN THE SOUF SIIDDEEE, WE BE STRAPPIN THEM GATS, AND DEUCIN THEM CATSSSSSSSS
Old 04-27-2006, 01:03 PM
  #7  
That's what she said...
iTrader: (8)
 
TheBlurLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 7,954
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

^^^ WTF? ^^^

This car has 3.5" duals on it.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4626930042

Might just want to get some 3.5" bullets and clamp them onto the collectors with a turndown.
Old 04-27-2006, 02:57 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
 
steve2001sh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You need about 2.2 cfm and 20.3" of water per HP for max efficency. Pipes flow about 115 cfm per square inch across (a 3" pipe is about 7 in^2 -- 1.5^2 * 3.14).

3" dual
Max HP = pipe radius^2 * 3.14 * number of pipes * 115 / 2.2
738 HP = 1.5^2 * 3.14 * 2 * 115 / 2.2
3.5" dual
1005 HP = 1.75^2 * 3.14 * 2 * 115 / 2.2

Your call

Last edited by steve2001sh; 04-28-2006 at 07:19 AM.
Old 04-27-2006, 08:59 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Going with 3.5. Thanks for the help and math
Old 04-27-2006, 11:37 PM
  #10  
That's what she said...
iTrader: (8)
 
TheBlurLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 7,954
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SiL3NtXWS6
Going with 3.5. Thanks for the help and math
Now your pipe will be bigger than ours.....
Old 04-27-2006, 11:43 PM
  #11  
That's what she said...
iTrader: (8)
 
TheBlurLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 7,954
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by steve2001sh
You need about 2.2 cfm and 20.3" of water per HP for max efficency. Pipes flow about 115 cfm per square inch across (a 3" pipe is about 7 in^2 -- 1.5^2 * 3.14).

3" dual
Max HP = 2.2 * pipe radius^2 * 3.14 * number of pipes * 115
738 HP = 2.2 * 1.5^2 * 3.14 * 2 * 115
3.5" dual
1005 HP = 2.2 * 1.75^2 * 3.14 * 2 * 115

Your call
BTW - You need to be dividing all that by 2.2, not multiplying.

Max HP = (pipe radius^2 * 3.14 * number of pipes * 115) / 2.2 = CFM/2.2
Old 04-28-2006, 07:19 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
 
steve2001sh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheBlurLS1
BTW - You need to be dividing all that by 2.2, not multiplying.

Max HP = (pipe radius^2 * 3.14 * number of pipes * 115) / 2.2 = CFM/2.2
Thanks for the catch. I did the math right. I just typed it wrong. I will edit my original post.
Old 04-28-2006, 09:01 AM
  #13  
Launching!
 
98LS-WON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=SiL3NtXWS6]

This is going on a car that makes roughly 800whp. I read that 3inch duals can only support rougly around 800-900whp, is this true?

QUOTE]

I wish I had this problem.
Old 04-28-2006, 09:18 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

maybe someday? I was cam only 4 times before i stepped it up




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.