what mass air setup are you guys runing with a fast 90/90 and strokers?
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: marion nc 28752
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what mass air setup are you guys runing with a fast 90/90 and strokers?
all i hear is how bad aftermarket mafs are so what are you guys running to get more flow ?
#6
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Originally Posted by TheBlurLS1
Contact your tuner. Lots of guys run the 2002 z06 MAF. It's 85mm with no screen. You will need to get the adapter harness that Caspers electronics sells, they are a sponsor.
#7
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Laredo,Tx
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would like to know also,Im trying to squeeze more power out of my 408.I want to change to a 85mm lid and 85mm MAF descreened.Are all 85mm maf the same part# as far as it being in a new truck etc......
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Originally Posted by gman
What do you not like about sd tunes.
My car ran like *** and was a bitch to get the tune lined out with the MAF on it.
On the other hand, ditching the MAF, and starting over with a factory tune file and going the Speed Density route was almost effortless. 408, 248/254 cam, and FAST 90 setup has near perfect street manners during the ~1000 miles per week I drive it. 20+ mpg to boot.
Even with the weather around here switching from cool and no humidity to hot as **** with tons of humidity, the table needed only minor changes (which my fuel trims would take care of if I turned them back on)
#11
11 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 3,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am running an 85mm Delphi with my NW 90mmTB and FAST 90 intake along with an K&N FIPK, car was retuned recently with the afore mentioned parts and has excellent street manners with a GT1-1(229/242 .631/.631 114CL)and LPE 383 stroker.
#12
That's what she said...
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by 86 IROC
It may not be a factor in this case... but wouldn't A4 guys want one with screens? I don't know, that's why I am asking.
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Originally Posted by 86 IROC
I agree, my car ran better SI with the screen in the stock ends vs. a set of TR MAF ends w/o a screen. My tuner requested that I bring him my car w/ an 85mm SLP MAF - so that is what I bought. ::shrug::
#15
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Japan
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Go SD I am, I read on here on another thread that stock Zo6 Maf flows just as well as SD so the way I read into that is get rid of it and save another 5lbs of the front of your motor all adds up you know.
#16
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Originally Posted by xaon
That's because ported MAF ends were an OLD bandaid used before widespread tuning was available. Imagine how rich a LS1 gets with headers and a cam with NO tuning at all... the ported MAF ends threw the calibration way out of wack and ended up leaning the motor out some. Then the MAF Translator came out and saved the day for some of us... for a little while.
My car ran rich untuned w/ LT's, but nothing too bad. I observed 12.6:1 average doing pulls on the street w/ an LM1 hooked up. I switched to TSP duals and my car went dangerously lean vs. the ORY set up. The tune straightened that out, and greatly helped the area under the curve.