Differences in the LS2 and LS6 intakes
09-13-2006, 12:05 PM
#2
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't have much experience with this, but it is well known that the ls2 intake doesn't flow as good as the ls6. I'm not 100% sure about this, but I didn't think the ls2 6.0 was out yet in 2002...you aren't talking about the 6.0 on the trucks are you? (the truck 6.0 wouldn't be an upgrade)
09-13-2006, 01:35 PM
#3
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Danville, VA
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the 6.0 intake manifold is one of the best flowing intakes available, if the engine is in a truck keep the 6L manifold, if the engine is going in a car (f-body or vette) you might want to look into a Fast 90 instead.
09-13-2006, 02:35 PM
#5
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver,[KITSILANO].B.C. Canada *WestCoast*
Posts: 8,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2000TransAmWS6
the 6.0 intake manifold is one of the best flowing intakes available, if the engine is in a truck keep the 6L manifold, if the engine is going in a car (f-body or vette) you might want to look into a Fast 90 instead.
intake guru's please chime in..