TB question
#1
TB question
i just have a new throttle body it cames with a spacer but it's not open behind the throttle sensor some people tell me if your car with a cam put it if not remove it just put the open side of the sensor gasket it that true
#4
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2004 blue gto
i just have a new throttle body it cames with a spacer but it's not open behind the throttle sensor some people tell me if your car with a cam put it if not remove it just put the open side of the sensor gasket it that true
#5
i'm saying that there is acarbon sensor in the back of the throttle body when i buy it it cames with a spacer but the spacer is not open around the carbon sensor that's what i mean
#7
http://www.csvaustralia.com/eshop/catalog/images/tb.jpg
this black spacer is closed
http://www.jhp.com.au/img/products/e....jpg?imagealt=
here behind the TB there is a hole for the carbon sensor when you put the spacer it willl be closed is that ok?
this black spacer is closed
http://www.jhp.com.au/img/products/e....jpg?imagealt=
here behind the TB there is a hole for the carbon sensor when you put the spacer it willl be closed is that ok?
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by 2004 blue gto
http://www.csvaustralia.com/eshop/catalog/images/tb.jpg
this black spacer is closed
http://www.jhp.com.au/img/products/e....jpg?imagealt=
here behind the TB there is a hole for the carbon sensor when you put the spacer it willl be closed is that ok?
this black spacer is closed
http://www.jhp.com.au/img/products/e....jpg?imagealt=
here behind the TB there is a hole for the carbon sensor when you put the spacer it willl be closed is that ok?
#10
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what
__________________
I don't want to hear about your RWHP numbers, It's all b.s.. Figuring a conservative 20% powertrain loss, a stock 305 h.p. Z-28 puts a realistic 245 h.p. to the wheels! And runs 13.60's. At 400 RWHP, the same car would be running mid 11's!
this is the dumbest qoute iv ever read.dynoes dont lie.not every drive train uses uses the same amount of power.20% is not acurate.the 305 hp is way underrated do research.
I don't want to hear about your RWHP numbers, It's all b.s.. Figuring a conservative 20% powertrain loss, a stock 305 h.p. Z-28 puts a realistic 245 h.p. to the wheels! And runs 13.60's. At 400 RWHP, the same car would be running mid 11's!
this is the dumbest qoute iv ever read.dynoes dont lie.not every drive train uses uses the same amount of power.20% is not acurate.the 305 hp is way underrated do research.
#11
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 5_02ls1
__________________
I don't want to hear about your RWHP numbers, It's all b.s.. Figuring a conservative 20% powertrain loss, a stock 305 h.p. Z-28 puts a realistic 245 h.p. to the wheels! And runs 13.60's. At 400 RWHP, the same car would be running mid 11's!
this is the dumbest qoute iv ever read.dynoes dont lie.not every drive train uses uses the same amount of power.20% is not acurate.the 305 hp is way underrated do research.
I don't want to hear about your RWHP numbers, It's all b.s.. Figuring a conservative 20% powertrain loss, a stock 305 h.p. Z-28 puts a realistic 245 h.p. to the wheels! And runs 13.60's. At 400 RWHP, the same car would be running mid 11's!
this is the dumbest qoute iv ever read.dynoes dont lie.not every drive train uses uses the same amount of power.20% is not acurate.the 305 hp is way underrated do research.