Non-Coated Hooker LT's
11-23-2006, 02:56 PM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Bay, Ontario
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Non-Coated Hooker LT's How are these fitment wise? Still enough clearance to lower? Will there be any difference other than looks with just the painted headers instead of the Cermic coated ones?? Does anyone know if the 98-99 model headers have the E.G.R and A.I.R fitments? thanks
11-23-2006, 03:16 PM
#3
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver,[KITSILANO].B.C. Canada *WestCoast*
Posts: 8,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you should spend the extra and get coated also...in a few months you will ask yourself why you didn't...looks, less heat....much better and worth it..........BTW..check out the Edelbrock Coated Race Style Headers with Air/Egr..I did and am quite happy..nice welds and the coating looks brand new still after 10,000 miles. 
[these went in nice also, and good clearance]
[these went in nice also, and good clearance] 
11-23-2006, 06:50 PM
#5
Yea its not the looks or the fitment of the coated ones, its the fact that the coating does a billion times better job of isolating the heat so that underhood temps stay downt
11-23-2006, 07:51 PM
#7
yea i have coated pacesetters fitment is GREAT, im lowered at least 2 inches and never scrap my headers, now the Y pipe is a difference story, but i scraped my stocker too