Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Duals vs SIngle C/B.... Weight and HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2007, 02:18 AM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Duals vs SIngle C/B.... Weight and HP

I was thinking.

What is the weight difference between a regular C/B exh like lets say Magnaflow, and a regular true dual exhaust? If TD's gain about 10hp over a regular exh system.

if 10lbs = 1hp. is the weight gain worth the HP gain, or does it even out? Extra sound and maybe an actual street/track gain of 5hp....
Old 01-05-2007, 04:04 AM
  #2  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
DreamState23x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm... I would think that dual would be a little lighter actually. I never weighed mine vs the old catback. If you have a dual system dumped at the rear axle you would have less tube since its not going over the axle, you replace that big muffler with smaller ones, and probrably would have no cats either, and no tips. I don't think there is going to be a big weight difference either way, but my guess would be that the duals would be less. 2.5 duals would be even less.
Old 01-05-2007, 09:32 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dyess AFB, TX
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Duals are lighter.
Old 01-05-2007, 10:16 AM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It depends which muffler for duals. If you go with a single dual-in dual-out muffler for True Duals, it's going to weigh very close to a catback, just the extra piping going back to the muffler and out. If you were to run bullets and dumps, it might actually come in lighter than a catback. Either way you are gaining more tq with duals that outweighs the minor weight advantage.
Old 01-05-2007, 11:46 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dyess AFB, TX
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by lsx24
It depends which muffler for duals. If you go with a single dual-in dual-out muffler for True Duals, it's going to weigh very close to a catback, just the extra piping going back to the muffler and out. If you were to run bullets and dumps, it might actually come in lighter than a catback. Either way you are gaining more tq with duals that outweighs the minor weight advantage.
Why would you use a dual-in/dual-out muffler for duals?
Old 01-05-2007, 11:50 AM
  #6  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BADFNZ
Why would you use a dual-in/dual-out muffler for duals?
I guess you're not familiar with the Bassani True Dual Exhaust...

It places a single dual-in dual-out muffler in the stock location, then runs duals into it, and duals out of it. It's a compact way of running true duals on these cars, considering the packaging contraints.

I had the Bassani system on my car and gained 20 lb/ft of tq in the midrange over the stock ypipe setup. It sounded and performed awesome.
Old 01-05-2007, 12:08 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This is why i just stuck a bullet off each header. I saved the most weight while making the most power.
Old 01-05-2007, 07:25 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
wldesyWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

"This is why i just stuck a bullet off each header. I saved the most weight while making the most power."

and what setup/power are you running? i see in your sig you run 9s....if so then you dont need the backpressure like bayer-z28 and the rest of us runnin 12 sec range 1/4 miles.....we need to take advantage of scavenging, or else thats what i would do- anyone object to that????????
Old 01-05-2007, 07:30 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
mrr23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

bah, gain of what 20 lbs going from stock exhaust with 3" electric cutout to the bassani tru-duals? went .3 and 3 mph quicker. i'll take the trade off.
Old 01-06-2007, 12:59 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by mrr23
bah, gain of what 20 lbs going from stock exhaust with 3" electric cutout to the bassani tru-duals? went .3 and 3 mph quicker. i'll take the trade off.
Was that with the stock cats?

Nice pics on your website.
Old 01-06-2007, 03:39 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
wldesyWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

"This is why i just stuck a bullet off each header. I saved the most weight while making the most power."

and what setup/power are you running? i see in your sig you run 9s....if so then you dont need the backpressure like bayer-z28 and the rest of us runnin 12 sec range 1/4 miles.....we need to take advantage of scavenging, or else thats what i would do- anyone object to that????????

SOMEONE PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS
Old 01-06-2007, 08:42 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by wldesyWS6
"This is why i just stuck a bullet off each header. I saved the most weight while making the most power."

and what setup/power are you running? i see in your sig you run 9s....if so then you dont need the backpressure like bayer-z28 and the rest of us runnin 12 sec range 1/4 miles.....we need to take advantage of scavenging, or else thats what i would do- anyone object to that????????

SOMEONE PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS
I object!



1) Back pressure is bad. It does not help whether you run 9's 12's or 15's.

2) Scavening is good, but the right headers with the proper extension will create that all by themselves.

The goal of the Y-pipe or duals is to get rid of the exhaust far enough back for safety, reducing the noise to a level you deem acceptable, while creating as little back pressure possible.

Last edited by Ragtop 99; 01-06-2007 at 08:47 PM.
Old 01-06-2007, 09:20 PM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
wldesyWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

anyone else agree or disagree with that? this topic just seems to be highly debated..
Old 01-06-2007, 11:15 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
 
00454sscamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: south jersey
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

+1^ i think open headers perform better then any dual setup... as ive tried a few of both and open headers makes the engine rev alot faster...... the only thing i wouldnt like about just open headers is the smell(even though my ms4/stage 1's going through big kooks smells beautiful and sounds like the devil reincarnated) the noise is also still an issue after 20 or 30 mins of driving. not sure how accurate this info is, sure heard it alot though- but without some extensions on the headers the o2's dont last as long.. and on a prevois car- 84 z28-355ci it smelled badly with open headers badly of unburnt fuel and had big backfires when letting off the gas..
Old 01-06-2007, 11:17 PM
  #15  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BADFNZ
Why would you use a dual-in/dual-out muffler for duals?
That is what that Bassani one is. I don't like it, nor do I know why.
Old 01-06-2007, 11:39 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My set of 3" duals from Lane is significantly lighter than JUST the section of the stock catback from where the pipe goes over the axle. Add in the weight of the cats and stock y-pipe, and it's porobably double the weight of the duals.
Old 01-07-2007, 01:13 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
jimmypop13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SPRING, TX
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just got Lanes true duals and they seem pretty heavy but I can tell the only reason why is because of the Flopro Twister mufflers. Jeez they weigh alot. I'm about to replace them though so after I do that, I bet it will be lighter or the same as my GMMG catback
Old 01-07-2007, 01:17 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by wldesyWS6
"This is why i just stuck a bullet off each header. I saved the most weight while making the most power."

and what setup/power are you running? i see in your sig you run 9s....if so then you dont need the backpressure like bayer-z28 and the rest of us runnin 12 sec range 1/4 miles.....we need to take advantage of scavenging, or else thats what i would do- anyone object to that????????

SOMEONE PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS
515/500 motor
750/800 spray


You can go ahead and jump on the backpressure train hype, but i don't believe in it all that much. My car has neck snapping torque and power. I gained torque with this setup vs a single straight pipe/ Y pipe setup. Most of the fastest N/A LS1 guys are running either extensions or bullets off each header.
Old 01-08-2007, 09:08 AM
  #19  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wldesyWS6
"This is why i just stuck a bullet off each header. I saved the most weight while making the most power."
There is one thing I'm curious about, what about the scavenging effect of duals?

Doesn't that outweigh the lack of backpressure of open headers? You could argue the same reason not to run shorties and go with long tubes, because shorties don't scavenge...

For example, if you were to run open headers, let's say you're at 400 rwtq. But if you were to run true duals with xpipe crossover, you'd be higher, at 410 rwtq, for instance. Wouldn't running duals make the most power, not open headers?

You could make the argument that NHRA drag cars run open headers, not duals. But they are hardly lacking for hp, they can make whatever hp is legal with the parts required in their class, I don't think they need to run duals, for them the simpler the better.
Old 01-08-2007, 09:10 AM
  #20  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

When you are making 500rwhp scavenging isnt going to be a factor like you would think.


Quick Reply: Duals vs SIngle C/B.... Weight and HP



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 AM.