Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

XFI™ RPM, XR265HR vs XFI™ RPM Hi-Lift, XR265HR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2008, 08:24 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
KroMiniX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: southern most point
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default XFI™ RPM, XR265HR vs XFI™ RPM Hi-Lift, XR265HR

Opinions on both.... I have a 98 SS and am looking for a drivable street cam... I dont want to sacrifice too much midrange and throttle response so i am looking for a nice mild cam. the specs are a little different on the two but is the xtreme rpm cam that much more wild or what?
Old 10-30-2008, 04:23 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
macca33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 60 mi SE of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

No, the xtreme rpm one isn't that wild at all, rather, it has fairly tame lobes compared to many cams installed by people.

I would take that one over the milder-lobed cam to be honest. It produces great results and the car would be almost stock-mannered, but with a little more oomph up top.

Check this articel from Comp - http://www.compcams.com/Community/Ar...ID=-1044516358 - using the XR-269HR hi-lift.

I reckon a custom Comp 218/224 .605/.609 @112+2 cam would be nicer though!!!

Cheers,

Macca



Quick Reply: XFI™ RPM, XR265HR vs XFI™ RPM Hi-Lift, XR265HR



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM.