Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

vindicator or ms4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2008, 01:26 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default vindicator or ms4?

This is for my 3700lb, 3500 stalled, GTO.

I have a 0.040 cometic gasket and unmilled ls6 heads.

As far as I've read, clearance should be fine, but I'll be putting in some fly cut pistons anyway.

Question is, will it make enough tq to get this boat to move? It's mainly a saturday driver and track car now. Don't care much about driveability.
I'm just worried if my stall will be big enough. I have 3.4x gearing right now also.

It will see nitrous on the track also.
Old 11-18-2008, 01:41 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Also, I'm leaning towards the vindicator since it has lower lift, and I have the comp 918's which are good to .625 and i'd like to re-use those since i'm on a budget
Old 11-18-2008, 01:44 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
LSWONGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ramstein AB, Germany
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Vindicator sounds better IMO!!
Old 11-18-2008, 04:02 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Vindicated346's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I love the vindicator, and hell even the MS4, but for your weight and auto, I would go for down low torque which the "polluter" seems to be good with..my .02 though
Old 11-18-2008, 04:32 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Chrome355z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You would be much better off with a 228/232. Look at the Streetsweeper-HT. Very popular on the gto boards.

MS4/Vindicator is WAY too much cam for a stock headed LS1/2. Especially since you are full weight and stock gears.

You need some midrange torque even with that stall to get that big ******* mama movin'!
Old 11-18-2008, 04:33 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Chrome355z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vindicated346
I would go for down low torque which the "polluter" seems to be good with..my .02 though
The polluter is bigger then the MS4. Low end torque will be non-existant esp with stock heads (241 or 243).
Old 11-18-2008, 05:45 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
98blueSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aurora IL
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

One vote for the vindicator number's in sig it has good power off 3000 to 7000 but i would step up to a 4000 stall or a 3800 i love my vindicator with my stock ls6 long block. The stock ls6 heads and vindicator is a good hight power cheap setup.

Rob
Old 11-18-2008, 06:14 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

my buddy is running the vindicator "UNTUNED" in his 98 SS M6 and that $hit straight up rips!! and it sounds so bad *** man. i was so surprised how drivable his car was untuned with a such a big cam. it didnt buck, surge or die out!!
Old 11-18-2008, 07:22 PM
  #9  
Restricted User
 
willyfastz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nieghter of those cams is the best choice for a stock headed street car. We're doing a GTO right now that is only getting 22X intake duration and will be south of 450rwhp with good lowend torque. Wanting to save your springs kinda limits your choices and may cost you more down the road.
Old 11-18-2008, 07:26 PM
  #10  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chrome355z
You would be much better off with a 228/232. Look at the Streetsweeper-HT. Very popular on the gto boards.

MS4/Vindicator is WAY too much cam for a stock headed LS1/2. Especially since you are full weight and stock gears.

You need some midrange torque even with that stall to get that big ******* mama movin'!
Good advice here.

While I'm not knocking the Vindicator or MS4, they're great max effort cams. But for a stock geared heavy pig GTO, the car is going to be dickless below 4500 rpms with any of the huge upper 230's/low 240's cams even with the stall IMO. You need a cam that's going to generate TQ to get the car moving, or it's not going to be a fast street car.

If you want to run a Vengeance cut, check out their X3 or X4. Both excellent cams, and make good TQ.
Old 11-18-2008, 08:32 PM
  #11  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
KLR_LSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default cam

the mti x1 cam seems to make good power to torque
Old 11-19-2008, 09:42 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by KLR_LSX
the mti x1 cam seems to make good power to torque

yes it does...
Old 11-19-2008, 12:12 PM
  #13  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (51)
 
Ron@Vengeance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 5,628
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Neither.... Step down to our VRX5 camshaft. It will work VERY well with your current stall and give you the midrange power/torque you need without giving up alot of topend...

All of our Comp products are currently 10% off for the month of November!!!!
Old 11-19-2008, 07:29 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I allready have a TSP224R....Running 11.07 @122 on 125 shot and drag radials.

Is there a bigger cam that I can still run my 918's? I have 2 sets of these, if not, I'll just sell them.
Old 11-19-2008, 07:43 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chrome355z
The polluter is bigger then the MS4. Low end torque will be non-existant esp with stock heads (241 or 243).
low end tq non existent.. have you rode in a correctly setup big cammed car.... judging by that statement, no.


id go ms3... your stall is a bit small for a ms4, or equal sized cam..
Old 11-19-2008, 08:01 PM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
5.3LJimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Napoleonville, LA
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The MS3 is 237/242 and the MS4 is 239/242. How is the MS3 a better choice for his converter?
Old 11-19-2008, 08:05 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5.3LJimmy
The MS3 is 237/242 and the MS4 is 239/242. How is the MS3 a better choice for his converter?
the powerbands are different.. ms4 doesnt kick in to later.... ms4 you need at least a 4k converter, ms3 you need at least a 3500...

ideal.. ms3-4k... ms4-4400-4600
Old 11-19-2008, 08:11 PM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
5.3LJimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Napoleonville, LA
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The MS4 comes in earlier than the MS3 and has slightly better low end torque. That's why they came out with it, to help regain the bottom end people were losing with the MS3.
Old 11-19-2008, 08:23 PM
  #19  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
98blueSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aurora IL
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My vindicator made 315rwtq at 3000rpm and at 3600rpm it made 360rwtq and at 4450rpm 370rwtq and at 4900rpm it made 388rwtq. Idont think thats bad at all for how did it is
Old 11-19-2008, 09:40 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Chrome355z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
low end tq non existent.. have you rode in a correctly setup big cammed car.... judging by that statement, no.
Compared to a smaller cam YES.

Dude this car is a GTO which is a ******* fat momma at 3,700lbs. I'm not an expert, but even the sponsers talking in this thread agree a "big" cam is NOT the way to go.

He has stock heads so a big cam is going to lose more midrange torque then they would pick up on the big end do you not agree?

Can he run this cam and perform? Yes. How?

PT4400 at a Minimum, and a minimum of 4.56 gears in the rear would be probably his best chance to beat times he could run with a smaller cam with a much more streetable setup. I'm not ******* the MS3. MS4, or Vindicator; just saying it isn't the best cam for his build.

Now if he shaved off 500lbs then it would be a little different story; although I still wouldn't go with the donkey dicks with stock heads.

Last edited by Chrome355z; 11-19-2008 at 09:45 PM.


Quick Reply: vindicator or ms4?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 AM.