Cubic Inches...
#4
TECH Fanatic
To calculate displacement easily:
bore x bore x stroke x .7854 x # cyl = displacement
4.005 x 4.005 x 3.622 x.7854 x 8 = ?
Hint: 7854 are the numbers in the upper left of a keypad run clockwise. On a phone pad they are in the lower left run counterclockwise.
Extra credit: where does the .7854 come from? (actually .785398163...)
bore x bore x stroke x .7854 x # cyl = displacement
4.005 x 4.005 x 3.622 x.7854 x 8 = ?
Hint: 7854 are the numbers in the upper left of a keypad run clockwise. On a phone pad they are in the lower left run counterclockwise.
Extra credit: where does the .7854 come from? (actually .785398163...)
#6
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To calculate displacement easily:
bore x bore x stroke x .7854 x # cyl = displacement
4.005 x 4.005 x 3.622 x.7854 x 8 = ?
Hint: 7854 are the numbers in the upper left of a keypad run clockwise. On a phone pad they are in the lower left run counterclockwise.
Extra credit: where does the .7854 come from? (actually .785398163...)
bore x bore x stroke x .7854 x # cyl = displacement
4.005 x 4.005 x 3.622 x.7854 x 8 = ?
Hint: 7854 are the numbers in the upper left of a keypad run clockwise. On a phone pad they are in the lower left run counterclockwise.
Extra credit: where does the .7854 come from? (actually .785398163...)
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
I guess that question was too easy for extra credit.
Where does 5252.113122... (usually just "5252") come from in the HP/torque/rpm equation? Why? You're on, LSGun.
#10
The answer was actually just on the History channel a few nights ago. It's more or less James Watt's conversion factor to change newtons, which at the time very few people knew about in the late 1700's, to horsepower, which back then everybody could relate to.
#11
TECH Fanatic
Give this man extra credit even though it's wrong.
The answer was actually just on the History channel a few nights ago. It's more or less James Watt's conversion factor to change newtons, which at the time very few people knew about in the late 1700's, to horsepower, which back then everybody could relate to.
The answer was actually just on the History channel a few nights ago. It's more or less James Watt's conversion factor to change newtons, which at the time very few people knew about in the late 1700's, to horsepower, which back then everybody could relate to.
It's not wise to imbibe whilst watching The History Channel.
#15
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
Pi/4 = .785398163...
__________________
Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!
COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!
COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
#16
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
This guy already did
__________________
Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!
COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!
COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
#19
TECH Fanatic
Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
radians
Sorry guys, 99 was hinting at the answer to the "where does 5252.113122... come from in the hp/torque/rpm equation" question. I guess I better number them.
This one is a little tougher than PI/4, but we use it all the time. It's radians, not radius that 99 mentioned. That was not a typo.
We should not just accept "5252" on faith. Rather we should know from whence it comes. Well, at least IMO.