Ms3 Cam only numbers
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Acworth, Ga
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ms3 Cam only numbers
Here are the dynojet numbers from getting tuned last Tuesday. It's MS3 cam with mods in sig and fram paper air filter. Let me know what you think? The red lines are after the cam and the blue ones are tuned with headers.
#5
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Great results! I'd love to see that car with a set of PRC215s & a fast ported intake combo. I bet she's capable of 480+rwhp easy with that kind of combo!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#7
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
jesus, the stock cam was making 315whp @ 1800rpm? dayum. lt1 what?
nice peak numbers, appears you lost a ****-ton of midrange torque. i guess with those 410s you won't notice much a difference. what rpm does the engine fall back to after making a shift @ 6500? graph looks peaky.
nice peak numbers, appears you lost a ****-ton of midrange torque. i guess with those 410s you won't notice much a difference. what rpm does the engine fall back to after making a shift @ 6500? graph looks peaky.
Trending Topics
#8
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
If you get some time send me over a copy of your tune. I bet I can clear up the losses down low, judging by the graph there's a few things we can do to the tune that I bet will clear it up!!!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#11
TECH Fanatic
Jon
#13
TECH Senior Member
All it needs is more mods: Heads, intake, MAF and more compression to reach its potential.
That graph doesn't lie, looks like tuning can be tweaked a bit.
Fully supported it can achieve great numbers, cam only is not its "forte" (loss in Trq/Hp till 3600 rpm)
Good Roll racer
That graph doesn't lie, looks like tuning can be tweaked a bit.
Fully supported it can achieve great numbers, cam only is not its "forte" (loss in Trq/Hp till 3600 rpm)
Good Roll racer
#14
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Acworth, Ga
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, I do not notice a loss in power anywhere. The car is a daily driver and if I am driving around below 4000 rpm "not racing" them I don't need the power anyway. The only time I would use the power is if I were racing. When I am racing every time I shift the rpm's would be above 4000.
#16
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Key West, Florida
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow...something isn't right with that low end....or at least i hope there is!
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.
#17
Banned Village Idiot
iTrader: (36)
wow...something isn't right with that low end....or at least i hope there is!
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.
#18
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Acworth, Ga
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow...something isn't right with that low end....or at least i hope there is!
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.