Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2.055 valve and stock displacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2009, 01:20 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (38)
 
Captain InsaneO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Whiteland, Indiana
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 2.055 valve and stock displacement

Long story short.. the search feature still licks *****. Is it a bad idea to run a 2.055 intake valve on a stock bottom end/displacement LS1 engine? I am assuming the largest cam I'd be able to go with, without flycutting, would be a G5X2 or a F14. The heads are a 64cc chambers.

Thanks.
Old 04-03-2009, 01:44 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (30)
 
stevied916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The cam doesn't matter. It won't fit in the stock bore
Old 04-03-2009, 02:41 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
405HP_Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 2,215
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevied916
The cam doesn't matter. It won't fit in the stock bore
Sure it will. I have Dart 225's on my stock 3.898 bore.
Old 04-03-2009, 02:44 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (38)
 
Captain InsaneO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Whiteland, Indiana
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

lol! I read where people say the 2.055 valves will work on a stock displacement engine, and read where other's say it won't work. This is another reason I posted this thread.

I appreciate the replies.
Old 04-03-2009, 03:40 PM
  #5  
TECH Regular
 
Magic Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Augusta Ks.
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know but I was of the opion that 2.02 valves were best on stock displacment.Am I wrong on this?
Old 04-03-2009, 04:29 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
massls1guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Captain InsaneO
Long story short.. the search feature still licks *****. Is it a bad idea to run a 2.055 intake valve on a stock bottom end/displacement LS1 engine? I am assuming the largest cam I'd be able to go with, without flycutting, would be a G5X2 or a F14. The heads are a 64cc chambers.

Thanks.
Good question. Seems like most performance oriented street heads tend not to go larger than 2.04" on the stock LS1 bore.

I was tempted by a set of Cartek 5x heads in the for sale section with big 2.055 valves. But the combustion chamber was also opened up for a larger bore, 4.125" I think.

A while back there was a good deal on some used TFS fast as cast heads with the 2.055" valves. That's when I noticed that TFS has 2 versions of that fast as cast head - 2.04" valve for LS1 and 2.055" for LS2 (also slightly different chamber size).

Another good data point is that the AFR 205's have a 2.02" valve.
Old 04-03-2009, 05:29 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
KH504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chocolate , city
Posts: 372
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have 2.055 valves with 64 cc 853 heads . Cam is a 228/234 588- 598 on a 112 but I have 60 thousand gaskets for some more room. Also a 230/242 615-615 on a 116 will fit also I know because it was in the car.
Old 04-03-2009, 05:39 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (23)
 
JFM-jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mastic Long Island N.Y.
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

2.08 here G5X4 needed flycutting 60.4CC chambers on a 5.3 head. The problem is the valve comes close the the cylinder wall and air can have a tough time getting around that side of it. Never seemed to give me any problems LOL.
Old 04-03-2009, 08:15 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
BADD SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baldwin, NY
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by JFM-jr
2.08 here G5X4 needed flycutting 60.4CC chambers on a 5.3 head. The problem is the valve comes close the the cylinder wall and air can have a tough time getting around that side of it. Never seemed to give me any problems LOL.
Yup, shrouding... Are those on the new motor, or were they on the old one too?
Old 04-03-2009, 09:18 PM
  #10  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (23)
 
JFM-jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mastic Long Island N.Y.
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

They were on the LS1 motor and will be flipped onto the LS2. The bigger bore should yeild me a couple of free bonus ponies via "unshrouding".
Old 04-03-2009, 10:39 PM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
BADD SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baldwin, NY
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by JFM-jr
They were on the LS1 motor and will be flipped onto the LS2. The bigger bore should yeild me a couple of free bonus ponies via "unshrouding".
yup, it will be a sweet setup for sure.... Cant wait to see ya at atco again, hopefully I'll stay in one piece...



Quick Reply: 2.055 valve and stock displacement



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 AM.