Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

help I am new and lost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2009, 09:01 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
bigknucklekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: cedar rapids iowa
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default help I am new and lost

I was hope in to run the Magic Stick V.3 237/242 .603/.609" Camshaft.what do i have to do to run that with 243 heads and stock bottom end. can i go to bigger valves then the stock ones
Old 07-18-2009, 09:37 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (73)
 
'02 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

2.02/1.60 are common valves to upgrade to and run in 243 (LS6) heads. As long as they aren't milled or milled too much you shouldn't have to worry about PTV (piston to valve clearance). With stock chamber, unmilled heads, you could even run a .040 cometic to boost compression a bit, or just run factory MLS .051. You'll also want to upgrade the springs (Comp 921 or PRC .660s), pushrods (Chromoly, probably 7.400), ported LS6 oil pump, timing chain (LS2), and replace lifters with LS7 lifters.

With all that you should have a solid combo!

Last edited by '02 WS6; 07-18-2009 at 10:23 PM.
Old 07-18-2009, 10:56 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
SOMbitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by '02 WS6
2.02/1.60 are common valves to upgrade to and run in 243 (LS6) heads. As long as they aren't milled or milled too much you shouldn't have to worry about PTV (piston to valve clearance). With stock chamber, unmilled heads, you could even run a .040 cometic to boost compression a bit, or just run factory MLS .051. You'll also want to upgrade the springs (Comp 921 or PRC .660s), pushrods (Chromoly, probably 7.400), ported LS6 oil pump, timing chain (LS2), and replace lifters with LS7 lifters.

With all that you should have a solid combo!
I started to point by point correct this post but decided it was easier to just tell you to ignore it even though a couple facts are correct at the end. PM me and I will be happy to help you out......
Old 07-18-2009, 11:15 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (73)
 
'02 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

No, please post your corrections, I'd like to hear what you would do differently.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.