Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

XER lobe vs XE lobe etc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2003, 06:21 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
JoeDirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default XER lobe vs XE lobe etc

Is there going to be much of a power difference between these two setups ??

Stealth II 224 220 581 581 116 XER

or this custom Grind comp cam with 1.75 rockers on regular lobes

224 220 564 564 116 + 1.75 magnum rockers = 224 220 580 580 ??
Old 11-19-2003, 07:16 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
niphilli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,695
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JoeDirt
Is there going to be much of a power difference between these two setups ??

Stealth II 224 220 581 581 116 XER

or this custom Grind comp cam with 1.75 rockers on regular lobes

224 220 564 564 116 + 1.75 magnum rockers = 224 220 580 580 ??
I doubt there would be a lot of power difference, but idle characteristics may be different between the two....Hopefully someone will chime in with experience.
Old 11-19-2003, 08:06 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
TEA Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I say the idle will be different and about 10rwhp.
Old 11-19-2003, 08:21 AM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Bowtieman4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The 1.75 should make the custom cam perform similar to the MTI cam. However, if you plan on running the 1.75 w/ the stealth cam it will make more power but lift will bw higher than .581. Didn't you want to keep the lift down or is that no longer a concern?




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.