Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stock Bore LS1 Ring End Gap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2009, 07:29 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
00pewterz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Stock Bore LS1 Ring End Gap

I have a stock bore ls1, just had the machine shop hone the cylinder walls true. I am going back together with it, and when fitting my rings I am getting .020-.021 on my top 2 rings. GM factory specs are top ring 0.009-0.017 and 2nd ring 0.017-0.027 . That seems a little off to me.
I guess what im trying to find out is, would that cause a problem? Should I get a set of oversized rings? The rings I have are Sealed Power P/N-E938K. Anyone have any suggestions?
Old 09-06-2009, 10:16 AM
  #2  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
00pewterz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Anybody?
Old 09-08-2009, 09:25 AM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
00pewterz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Could anyone point me in a direction to do some research? I have been searching, just cant seem to find what I need to know.
Old 09-08-2009, 11:32 PM
  #4  
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
iTrader: (12)
 
-Joseph-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas and Qatar
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That is ever so slightly loose for a N/A buildup, would it cause problems; probably nothing noticeable at all. I typically like stock shortblock rings in the .016-.018" range for the Top and .018-.020" for the 2nd, usually using about .002" spread Top to 2nd (.020" top .022" 2nd and so forth), as this variance will help alleviate ring flutter.

A simple formula for N/A street-type Top ring gap is .0045" x bore.

3.898" bore x .0045 = ~.018"

I think in my own LS1, my gaps using those sealed power rings out of the box were .020" Top and .028" 2nd, never gave it a 2nd thought. You can always file-to-fit using the .005" oversized rings, but I doubt the legwork is worth the effort.
Old 09-09-2009, 10:14 AM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
00pewterz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by -Joseph-
That is ever so slightly loose for a N/A buildup, would it cause problems; probably nothing noticeable at all. I typically like stock shortblock rings in the .016-.018" range for the Top and .018-.020" for the 2nd, usually using about .002" spread Top to 2nd (.020" top .022" 2nd and so forth), as this variance will help alleviate ring flutter.

A simple formula for N/A street-type Top ring gap is .0045" x bore.

3.898" bore x .0045 = ~.018"

I think in my own LS1, my gaps using those sealed power rings out of the box were .020" Top and .028" 2nd, never gave it a 2nd thought. You can always file-to-fit using the .005" oversized rings, but I doubt the legwork is worth the effort.
Thanks for the help Joseph. Are you running F/I on your LS1 with the ring gaps you mentioned? I am also throwing around the idea of a 100 wet shot, do you think that would be safe with .020 ring gap?
Old 03-19-2016, 01:22 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
colefmurray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: vancouver, canada
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by -Joseph-
That is ever so slightly loose for a N/A buildup, would it cause problems; probably nothing noticeable at all. I typically like stock shortblock rings in the .016-.018" range for the Top and .018-.020" for the 2nd, usually using about .002" spread Top to 2nd (.020" top .022" 2nd and so forth), as this variance will help alleviate ring flutter.

A simple formula for N/A street-type Top ring gap is .0045" x bore.

3.898" bore x .0045 = ~.018"

I think in my own LS1, my gaps using those sealed power rings out of the box were .020" Top and .028" 2nd, never gave it a 2nd thought. You can always file-to-fit using the .005" oversized rings, but I doubt the legwork is worth the effort.
I got my ls1 built and my top ring is .016 and bottom is .018. Think I would be ok with 7 - 10 pounds of boost or would I need to open up the top gap more?
Old 03-20-2016, 09:04 AM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fredonia,WI
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by colefmurray
I got my ls1 built and my top ring is .016 and bottom is .018. Think I would be ok with 7 - 10 pounds of boost or would I need to open up the top gap more?
If open these up to .022"- .030" cuz 7-10 always means fifteen on E85 later
The OP is just fine for his NA plus a hundred shot
Old 03-20-2016, 05:59 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
5w20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston , Tx
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by colefmurray
I got my ls1 built and my top ring is .016 and bottom is .018. Think I would be ok with 7 - 10 pounds of boost or would I need to open up the top gap more?
open them up more so it can be a true stock bottom end junkyard engine.



Quick Reply: Stock Bore LS1 Ring End Gap



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.