Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Installing some LS6 valve springs and have a few questions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2010, 02:59 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
lavoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Installing some LS6 valve springs and have a few questions.

motor is a stock cam LS1

My first question is do i need to change the seats at all? i was reading that the ls6 seat is thicker then a ls1 seat by .015, when i bought the ls6 springs i did not get the seats with them, as i was told originally that they are a direct drop in.

second question is has any one ever noticed if the LS6 springs do indeed give you a few more usable RPMs? what i mean by this is right now my LS1 pretty much hits a air wall ( valve float i think ) around 6200, so thats where i shift, but i need to run 4th out to 6500 threw the traps so my thinking was that the LS6 springs might move that air wall up a little and i wondered if any one every tested this and took note of the max RPM difference between the springs on a stock LS1 cam? any data and help would be great i am swapping the springs in a few days, thanks guys.
Old 02-20-2010, 03:19 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (14)
 
blackLS1m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Villa Park, Illinois
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

they are a direct drop in, i had them with my hotcam. i never ran it past 6200 though.
Old 02-20-2010, 03:20 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
SMALLBLOCKHERO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the installed height of the LS6 with a stock seat should be fine. it would only truly become an issue if you were worried about the coil bind. it might have a few pounds less seat pressure with the difference in thickness. i highly doubt it would matter.
Old 02-20-2010, 03:32 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
lavoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

thanks for the speedy replys, now maybe some one who can tell me if there is a rpm difference or not, the motor is turbo charged so i think the pressure behind the valve isnt helping much with float either. and its only 4th that will have to rev out, the factory limiter is moved to 6800 and i have the lingenfelter lnc-003 so i can set the spark limiter where ever i need to once i see where it ends up trapping at.
Old 02-20-2010, 08:09 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
SMALLBLOCKHERO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

obviously with a higher seat pressures the control of the valvetrain will be better. your experiencing less valve float on the top thus more power ay a highr RPM. pushrod deflection will be less but i am surprised the cam even makes power above 6000 to be honest since 99 and later cams were smaller then the 97-98's. have you tried short shifting it? it might result in a faster ET but less MPH by keeping it in its optimal powerband. just my randomn thoughts here.
Old 02-20-2010, 08:15 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

with a turbo you might want to run a more stout spring.PAC 1218 or 1518.what push rods are you running?
Old 02-20-2010, 09:00 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
lavoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SMALLBLOCKHERO
obviously with a higher seat pressures the control of the valvetrain will be better. your experiencing less valve float on the top thus more power ay a highr RPM. pushrod deflection will be less but i am surprised the cam even makes power above 6000 to be honest since 99 and later cams were smaller then the 97-98's. have you tried short shifting it? it might result in a faster ET but less MPH by keeping it in its optimal powerband. just my randomn thoughts here.
Originally Posted by garygnu
with a turbo you might want to run a more stout spring.PAC 1218 or 1518.what push rods are you running?
yeah i can play with the shift points of 2,3 but fourth is going to have to rev out to 6500 as the car traps 135 and i am out of tire and gear options.

garygnu as stated its all stock, its only a little 500-550 whp set up, pump gas ect. the stock push rods are supposed to be the same as the LS6 ones and guys have ran super chargers and turbos on stock LS6 and LS1s with no problems at low boost, i might look into some hardened push rods but i already bought these springs and am going to run them
Old 02-21-2010, 11:34 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,309
Received 857 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by garygnu
with a turbo you might want to run a more stout spring.PAC 1218 or 1518.what push rods are you running?
I am with him on this one. They aren't to pricey and damn good springs.
Old 02-21-2010, 11:38 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (41)
 
bearcatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster California
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hi,

Yes they are a direct install but the difference is in the valve seals.

LS1 springs use valve seals without the hat while the LS6 springs use valves seals with the hat.



.
Old 02-25-2010, 12:57 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
lavoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bearcatt
Hi,

Yes they are a direct install but the difference is in the valve seals.

LS1 springs use valve seals without the hat while the LS6 springs use valves seals with the hat.



.
the springs dont care what valve seal you use, the newer ls6 style have the seat and seal as one unit, on my car the seat and seal are separate its this seat that is slightly different in height. I did end up getting the comp cam push rods and valve seals and installed the springs last night. the new comp cam seals are all viton and there is no difference between the exhaust and intake seal, i think perhaps my valve seals had been changed at some point in the past as they was all also the same no brown and black as i expected.
Old 02-25-2010, 08:56 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (14)
 
blackLS1m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Villa Park, Illinois
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

my 01 ls1 had valve seals with the seat.
Old 02-25-2010, 08:57 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (41)
 
bearcatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster California
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lavoy
the springs dont care what valve seal you use, the newer ls6 style have the seat and seal as one unit, on my car the seat and seal are separate its this seat that is slightly different in height. I did end up getting the comp cam push rods and valve seals and installed the springs last night. the new comp cam seals are all viton and there is no difference between the exhaust and intake seal, i think perhaps my valve seals had been changed at some point in the past as they was all also the same no brown and black as i expected.
My original LS1 853 heads had no spring seats at all, the springs sat directly on the head.



.
Old 02-25-2010, 09:06 PM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (14)
 
blackLS1m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Villa Park, Illinois
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yeah the pre-01 ls1 had valve seals without seats now that i remember doing them on a 99 ls1. I think that the seal design change came out in 01.
Old 02-25-2010, 09:24 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (41)
 
bearcatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster California
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Most 2001s + should have 241 heads which are an upgrade from the 853 heads. Besides the seals with seats, the 241s flow a little better too.


.
Old 02-25-2010, 09:41 PM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (14)
 
blackLS1m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Villa Park, Illinois
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

some 2000's also came with 241's
Old 02-26-2010, 06:51 AM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

any boost is extra force working against the springs.a $10000 turbo motor would like $200 springs.
Old 02-26-2010, 10:08 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (41)
 
bearcatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster California
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blackLS1m6
some 2000's also came with 241's
I wasn't aware of that, I wish I could have been so lucky.

Not that it matters anymore being that I have Livernois heads now.
Old 02-26-2010, 10:10 AM
  #18  
9 Second Club
 
GueSS Who's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Think of the valve area acting as a sail with xxx pounds of pressure pushing against it.
You more spring pressure on a FI application vs a NA application.
Old 02-26-2010, 10:13 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (41)
 
bearcatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster California
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by garygnu
any boost is extra force working against the springs.a $10000 turbo motor would like $200 springs.

Absolutely,
Just like you mention previously, the PAC 1218 or 1518 are the way to go.
Especially the Nitrided 1518s.
Old 02-28-2010, 03:44 PM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
lavoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

my LS1 is a 1998 version and it had seats under the stock springs. not sure what heads it has as i never looked for the casting number, where is it located exactly?


Quick Reply: Installing some LS6 valve springs and have a few questions.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 AM.