Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ls2 heads in ls1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2010, 03:59 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Reno's2fastestfbodys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ls2 heads in ls1?

well Iam working on a limited budget!!!! I found a set of ls2 heads for 350 fully assembled.

what you think? need a ls2 intake too? Beneficial? or lost cause?
Old 03-29-2010, 08:07 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Jtm2085's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Ls6 intake is a much better intake then a ls2. You should be able to find them in the forsale section pretty reasobably.
Old 03-29-2010, 12:25 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

the LS2 heads should bolt right up with no problem and work with everything you already have. they should be 243's or 799's.
Old 03-29-2010, 12:30 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
 
brian_rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas/Afghanistan
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

yup 243 or 799 heads are a direct fit. also it depends on how much work you want to do to switch over the intakes. you have to convert a few things to be able to run an ls2 intake and its usually viewed as too much of a PITA to be worth any gains that intake MIGHT bring you. i'de say its worth a search.
Old 03-29-2010, 12:32 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
 
Kris Mangrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are the 243 casting the same as the ls6 heads?
Old 03-29-2010, 12:47 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
 
brian_rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas/Afghanistan
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

ls6 is the engine designation, 243 is the head casting number. the ls6 was not the only motor to use the 243 head castings.
Old 03-29-2010, 02:12 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,710
Received 297 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

The biggest difference between the LS2 heads(799) and the LS6 heads (243) is the valves. The LS2 heads have solid valves where the LS6 had hollow/sodium filled valves.

If you have an LS1 that is 02 - 04 you will have the LS6 manifold, if its 97 - 01 you will have the LS1 intake unless you have the 01 ZO6 and then you will have then LS6 intake manifold.

What the LS6 valves give you is lighter valve train and stability in the higher RPM range (6500 - 7K rpm) Since a lot of people know how good the 243/799 casting heads flow for 350 is a steel and jump on it. I would personally have them checked just to be safe. Do not pass them up they are a great buy, and you can upgrade your manifold later on.
Old 03-29-2010, 02:15 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02*C5
The biggest difference between the LS2 heads(799) and the LS6 heads (243) is the valves. The LS2 heads have solid valves where the LS6 had hollow/sodium filled valves.

If you have an LS1 that is 02 - 04 you will have the LS6 manifold, if its 97 - 01 you will have the LS1 intake unless you have the 01 ZO6 and then you will have then LS6 intake manifold.

What the LS6 valves give you is lighter valve train and stability in the higher RPM range (6500 - 7K rpm) Since a lot of people know how good the 243/799 casting heads flow for 350 is a steel and jump on it. I would personally have them checked just to be safe. Do not pass them up they are a great buy, and you can upgrade your manifold later on.
one correction, ALL 01 LS1 engines had the LS6 intake.
Old 03-29-2010, 02:18 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Reno's2fastestfbodys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well the reason I ask is cause my local LS guy says unlike the LS1 heads they are square vs being coffin style and that I would need to go with the ls2 intake as well. from what I have read so far that sounds like it is a reference to the ports. is this correct?
Old 03-29-2010, 02:22 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,710
Received 297 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Reno's2fastestfbodys
well the reason I ask is cause my local LS guy says unlike the LS1 heads they are square vs being coffin style and that I would need to go with the ls2 intake as well. from what I have read so far that sounds like it is a reference to the ports. is this correct?
No the heads are cathedral port ls1/ls6/ls2
Old 03-29-2010, 02:22 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,710
Received 297 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bww3588
one correction, ALL 01 LS1 engines had the LS6 intake.
ooops Dam am always thinking the turn over was in 02 oh well.

before i forget if your LS is 98/99 (some where in there) or older be careful the rod bolts are weaker and you can have issues if your spinning that bad boy past 6K rpm.
Old 03-29-2010, 03:13 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Reno's2fastestfbodys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so Iam at the understanding that,
1) I dont need a new intake
2) this is a good upgrade
3) you guys are awesome!

is all this correct?
Old 03-29-2010, 03:27 PM
  #13  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
maxspeed96ct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Central ,CT
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im curious to see the results with the LS2 heads and valves, cause Ive seen ls2 heads go for dirt cheap ...

g/luck
Old 03-29-2010, 04:45 PM
  #14  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
RedRocketZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Madrid, IA
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Reno's2fastestfbodys
so Iam at the understanding that,
1) I dont need a new intake
2) this is a good upgrade
3) you guys are awesome!

is all this correct?
You are correct sir.
Old 03-29-2010, 05:41 PM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
PICNIC_GEORGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sparks NV
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ls2 heads are the same as ls6 heads. The only difference is the ls6 had hollow intake and sodium filled exhaust valves while the ls2 heads had solid valves. As far as the difference from late model 799 castings is concerned. From what I understand is they were manufactured at a different facility using the same exact mold, so in theory they are the same as 243 heads. They'll all work just fine. Don't waste your time with an ls2 intake, while it will accept a better throttle body. I have yet to see an ls2 intake make more power in any comparisons.

If you're putting these on your 98, they'll be a little more work required. You'll need new valve covers, coil brackets(if I remember correctly you run the same coils you just have to flip one over no big deal), the hardware, and a couple other minor modifications.
Old 03-29-2010, 07:04 PM
  #16  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

keep in mind, stock 243's are only marginally better than the later LS1 heads...
Old 03-29-2010, 07:06 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
 
brian_rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas/Afghanistan
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

by later ls1 heads you mean 241's?
Old 03-29-2010, 07:11 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

sorry i ment LS1 heads in general.

and remember, the casting number is only a number. all LS1 heads are about the same.
Old 03-29-2010, 07:22 PM
  #19  
10 Second Club
 
David Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LS2 intake requires gaskets, 4 bolt throttle body($200.00-$325.00 or more) wiring harness adapter(75-$95.00),plus the price of the intake. The LS2 will not make much power on a stock 346. 408CI or more maybe a ported LS2 is the budget way to go, but for a stock bottom end you can't beat the LS6 for the price.
Old 03-29-2010, 07:34 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,710
Received 297 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

The Ls2 will flow about 15 to 18% more in ported form from the Ls6 and that's it there is no difference in none ported form of the LS2 manifold.


Quick Reply: ls2 heads in ls1?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 PM.