Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PAC 1221 vs Comp 921

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2010, 08:03 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default PAC 1221 vs Comp 921

Which to get?

I'm stuck on this one, and need to order next week.
Old 07-09-2010, 08:25 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You should list your intentions and cam specs with approximate RPM limit
at the very least.

Those springs are close, but not exactly equal in specs.

The Comp is a touch more aggressive, and has a bit more bind clearance.

Without any info, it's tough to recommend either...but a blind guess based
on the values: I'd go for the Comps.
Old 07-09-2010, 10:42 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

They are in fact, the same spring.
Old 07-09-2010, 11:55 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,710
Received 297 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Pac 1221
Seat Load: 135 @ 1.800
Open Load: 400 @ 1.150
Rate: 408
Coil Bind: 1.080
Max Lift: 0.650

Comp 921
Seat Load: 135 @ 1.770
Open Load: 400 @ 1.220
Coil Bind: 1.040
Rate (lbs./in.): 408
Max lift: .630

They are not the same spring they have different tolerances that in fact will make a difference. Now give us the cam specs to make an educated guess. If you don't have the specs or even a cam picked out this question is as useful as a cold bottle of fresh salt water in the desert.
Old 07-09-2010, 01:15 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

as useful as a cold bottle of fresh salt water in the desert.
Ha, nice

Just to add; I saw totally different specs for spring rate, coil bind, and seat
pressure for PAC :

http://www.pacracing.com/Street_Stri..._PAC_1221.html

Pac 1221
Seat Load: 135 @ 1.770 (< recommended install height)
Open Load: 400 @ 1.120
Rate: 307 lbs./in.
Coil Bind: 1.050 ( < not sure how they arrive at this. shimmed perhaps?)
Max Lift: 0.650
Old 07-09-2010, 01:48 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,710
Received 297 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Adrenaline_Z
Ha, nice

Just to add; I saw totally different specs for spring rate, coil bind, and seat
pressure for PAC :

http://www.pacracing.com/Street_Stri..._PAC_1221.html

Pac 1221
Seat Load: 135 @ 1.770 (< recommended install height)
Open Load: 400 @ 1.120
Rate: 307 lbs./in.
Coil Bind: 1.050 ( < not sure how they arrive at this. shimmed perhaps?)
Max Lift: 0.650
Ok i got my PAC 1221 infor here page 8
http://www.racingsprings.com/PDF/RS2009CAT.PDF

But again like i said it does nothing if there are no cam specs
Old 07-09-2010, 01:50 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Your source is liklely more accurate coming from the MFG catalog

(which also explains the odd coil bind height as I pointed out from my link).
Old 07-09-2010, 02:36 PM
  #8  
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Unaffliated Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Use the comp 26926 with the tool steel retainer
Old 07-09-2010, 07:30 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Brian@SpectacleSolutions
Use the comp 26926 with the tool steel retainer


926s with tool steel retainers
Old 07-09-2010, 07:58 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The spring rate for the PAC 1221 is 408 lbs. (See attached)

It is still my understanding that the PAC 1221 is remarketed by Trick Flow as its Part Number TFS-15201 and by Comp as the current 921. Coil bind specs vary based which retainer is being used. The lift specification varies based on the particular reseller's reasoned discretion.

Since this information is based on the specifications and informal phone conversations with various suppliers I cannot prove it and may well be misinformed. By all means feel free to believe what you want and buy from whatever seller you like.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
RS2010CAT_P12.pdf (166.3 KB, 487 views)
Old 07-09-2010, 09:42 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well this is a friggin rats nest of info.

If the spring rate is the same, then there's nothing more to consider.

Apparently, www.pacracing.com and www.racingsprings.com are both
PAC official sites? If so, then they messed up specs for their springs
on pacracing.com.

In any case, the companies should not be measuring the springs with
retainers when issuing specifications. A spring pressure tester measures
the spring without retainers. When you setup a cylinder head, you insert
the micrometer between the spring seat and retainer.

The spring rate gives pressure at a certain height; the install height is the
height of the spring itself.

Certain cam companies need to follow one standard for data presentation.



Thanks for clearing that up Darkman.
Old 07-10-2010, 05:26 PM
  #12  
Launching!
iTrader: (25)
 
1QWIKBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton Twp, NJ
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darkman
The spring rate for the PAC 1221 is 408 lbs. (See attached)

It is still my understanding that the PAC 1221 is remarketed by Trick Flow as its Part Number TFS-15201 and by Comp as the current 921. Coil bind specs vary based which retainer is being used. The lift specification varies based on the particular reseller's reasoned discretion.

Since this information is based on the specifications and informal phone conversations with various suppliers I cannot prove it and may well be misinformed. By all means feel free to believe what you want and buy from whatever seller you like.
There are only 2 (TWO) spring manufactures out there that control the entire process from start to finish. Those 2 manufacturers are Manley and PAC. All the others may do their own R&D (or simply repackage someone else's spring), but they are not in control of the manufacturing process from start to finish, they outsource that to who knows where.

I just put a set of Manley Nextek's on my motor.
Old 07-10-2010, 08:01 PM
  #13  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1QWIKBIRD
There are only 2 (TWO) spring manufactures out there that control the entire process from start to finish. Those 2 manufacturers are Manley and PAC.
Incorrect.....Thanks for playing though!!
Old 07-10-2010, 08:27 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,710
Received 297 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SweetS10V8
Incorrect.....Thanks for playing though!!
Old 07-10-2010, 09:11 PM
  #15  
Launching!
iTrader: (25)
 
1QWIKBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton Twp, NJ
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Who are the other manufacturers that control the entire process front to back?

Does Patriot? Comp Cams? Twisted Flow? Lunati? Crane (if they are still around?) Chet Herbert? Howards? others?

I am curious. I just went through this entire ordeal looking for springs after I suffered a broken spring. I talked at length with quite a few people, some sponsors on this board, others not associated with this board and that's the info I was given to work with. I'm not claiming to be the authority, but multiple unrelated sources passed this info on the me.

Share....please. Its how we all learn. It wouldn't totally surprise that there are more, but I would also bet there is a lot of "repackaging" going on amongst the various companies.

Chris

Last edited by 1QWIKBIRD; 07-10-2010 at 09:21 PM.
Old 07-11-2010, 06:27 AM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

24x/24x 63x/63x 110lsa
Old 07-11-2010, 07:43 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dubrado
24x/24x 63x/63x 110lsa
See post numbers 8 & 9.



Quick Reply: PAC 1221 vs Comp 921



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.