Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ls1 4.250 stroke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2010, 07:06 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
bp944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default ls1 4.250 stroke

What does it take to fit a 4.250 stroke in a ls1 block? Is it even possible and reliable? I'm wondering about putting some good hard road racing miles on it. Its a callies magnum II crank.
Old 07-25-2010, 10:50 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Generally speaking I would keep a smaller stroke on a road race car, its going to be wound up tight all the time and the motor would be a lot happier with a shorter stroke and less side load on the pistons and cylinders.

What about using that money to just buy a bigger LS block, say like a LS2,7,X etc if you can, that way you get some cubes from bore instead of stroke. I would think a stock LS7 would hold up really well if your wanting a good road race motor. I mention the LS7 because you could probably about buy one of those by the time you fully build and LS1 and put in a Callies 4.250 crank. Although I dont really know the going rate on a LS7
Old 07-26-2010, 07:14 AM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
bp944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've located a really cheap Callies magnum II. Other than that my option would be a bottom of the line callies, eagle, or just a stock crank. A callies magnum II aught to be alright for high end rpm if I had forged internals and a lightweight racing valvetrain. Or is that still too much side load?
Old 07-26-2010, 03:18 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Taspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 636
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

to use a 4.25 inch stroke you have to have one of 2 things...an aftermarket block with a taller deck height or you have to get deck spacer extensions that fit under the head.
Old 07-26-2010, 04:24 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
nysbadmk8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lehighton Pa
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

4.25in crank needs a tall deck, Or a ERL type of deck extension.
Old 07-26-2010, 04:50 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

damn forgot about that, saw those deck extensions/spacers on a 500 cube Z06.
Old 07-26-2010, 06:01 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
 
rednari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You do not necessarily need to deck the block. Shorter rods, or better yet, pistons with shorter shirts and higher wrist pin placement should work.

But, to maintain high RPM the motor should be over square (larger bore than stroke), and it would be impossible to achieve that being limited by the 3.9" LS1 bore coupled with a 4.25 crank. You would have a problem getting an LS2 block larger than 4.25 for an over square road racing motor. The crank is probably too big for anything less than an LS7 or LSX block.

For drag racing, well thats another matter.
Old 07-26-2010, 07:11 PM
  #8  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

We do 4.250 strokers a lot but use sleeved blocks with longer sleeves. The big stroke causes power to occur earlier in the rpm range and can make more total power as well but it is a tight fit and you have to know what you are doing. The ones we have run are all doing fine so far after several years.
Old 04-11-2012, 06:42 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I know this is an old thread, but what about using cut journals 1.88-2.00 and .827-.787 wrist pins for strictly NA. Would that help the stack any vs cost?
Old 04-11-2012, 09:44 PM
  #10  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TT427
I know this is an old thread, but what about using cut journals 1.88-2.00 and .827-.787 wrist pins for strictly NA. Would that help the stack any vs cost?
Yes absolutely. With a CCW we use 2.000 and sometimes an .866 pin
Old 04-12-2012, 03:53 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

So what is the comp height under sizing journals and pins?
Old 04-12-2012, 04:43 PM
  #12  
Teching In
 
jjtoma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sarasota,FL & NW Indiana
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by TT427
So what is the comp height under sizing journals and pins?
Journal size will not change comp height. Pins ?? - just subtract the difference between the two sizes, then divide by 2.
Old 04-12-2012, 05:49 PM
  #13  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

basically around 1.000
Old 07-24-2012, 12:42 PM
  #14  
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Eric

Have you done a project on LQ4/LQ9 using 4.25" stroke with out sleeving?

MRT
Old 07-25-2012, 05:28 PM
  #15  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS6
Eric

Have you done a project on LQ4/LQ9 using 4.25" stroke with out sleeving?

MRT
Yes but drag race only due to short piston.
Old 07-26-2012, 08:03 AM
  #16  
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You mean not a regular postion high like 1.344".

I found a stroker kit with 4.25" is the same price as 4.000" and I thought if it is the same price why not get the maximum if the block permits.

If this will require special none shelf postion compression hight then is it best to go with 4.125" stroker.

Thanks
Old 07-26-2012, 11:03 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
SSCamaro99_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ballwin, MO
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I may have a conservative point of view, but I wouldn't run more the 4 inch on a car I was going to drive alot. The tradoff is small, given the potential for issues.
Old 07-26-2012, 03:42 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SSCamaro99_3
I may have a conservative point of view, but I wouldn't run more the 4 inch on a car I was going to drive alot. The tradoff is small, given the potential for issues.
I agree for a stock 6.0 block.
Old 07-26-2012, 04:03 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
dtroike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: winnemucca nv
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think with the standard deck non sleeved bock you may want to run a shorter rod with some custom pistons. I've never put one together but you will probably need to do some block clearancing for the rods as well.
Old 07-26-2012, 11:13 PM
  #20  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS6
You mean not a regular postion high like 1.344".

I found a stroker kit with 4.25" is the same price as 4.000" and I thought if it is the same price why not get the maximum if the block permits.

If this will require special none shelf postion compression hight then is it best to go with 4.125" stroker.

Thanks
send me a link as the kit is probably a train wreck.


Quick Reply: ls1 4.250 stroke



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.