Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rebuilding a higher mileage 5.3 in preparation for forced induction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-2010, 06:30 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
evo462's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Rebuilding a higher mileage 5.3 in preparation for forced induction

I bought a motor (5.3L L33) and was told it had around 100k miles - I have no reason to doubt the seller, but have kicked around the idea of "freshening it" if it weren't too much money to do so. It's replacing a meticulously maintained LS1 with 80k miles, so I have this nagging in the back of my mind about dropping in a motor with unknown mileage to replace it. I realize the 5.3's are considered expendable and all, but I don't want to have to say "here's my mint condition 2002 Camaro and 5.3L with who knows how many miles, probably a lot".

Pretty much everything other than the short block is getting replaced, and I would like to keep the stock 5.3 pistons if they're in good shape and the bore isn't worn out (and they appear to be in good shape, without disassembly). But what, if anything, could I do to ensure this puppy is running good as new when I drop it in my Camaro to replace the mint LS1?

If it's going to cost me $1000 to "freshen" it up, I'll either spend more and buy a "new" short block, or say screw it and drop it in there anyway.
Old 12-14-2010, 07:30 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
evo462's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

crickets chirping...not worth rebuilding?
Old 12-14-2010, 07:40 PM
  #3  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

You could always bore it out and use pistons from an LS1. Cheap and effective.
Old 12-14-2010, 07:52 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
evo462's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If I were going to do that, Id probably just use my LS1 - the pistons in the 5.3 are better suited for boost too. If a cylinder hone is all that's needed, is enough material removed to require larger pistons?
Old 12-14-2010, 08:52 PM
  #5  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evo462
If I were going to do that, Id probably just use my LS1 - the pistons in the 5.3 are better suited for boost too. If a cylinder hone is all that's needed, is enough material removed to require larger pistons?
That depends.

If you torque plate hone it, it usually needs a good amount of material to clean up round again, so oversized (or LS1) pistons are required...unless you like piston slap.

Without a torque plate or with a ball hone, you could be able to basically get a new crosshatch without opening it up too much.

Why are 5.3L pistons batter for boost?
Old 12-14-2010, 09:45 PM
  #6  
Teching In
iTrader: (5)
 
austindub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Why are 5.3L pistons batter for boost?
Less surface area = stronger.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:18 PM
  #7  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by austindub
Less surface area = stronger.
But more cylinder volume would equal more power with the same cylinder pressure.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:43 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

put each piston at TDC and do leak down tests,if the results are good do new rod bolts ,oil pump,timing chain,push rods,and valve springs matching the cam needs.
Old 12-14-2010, 11:35 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
evo462's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanks...i need to track down a good shop in kansas city i suppose.

that would require the heads being on, I guess I could slap em on real quick for testing purposes.
Old 12-15-2010, 12:51 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
nicenice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evo462
thanks...i need to track down a good shop in kansas city i suppose.

that would require the heads being on, I guess I could slap em on real quick for testing purposes.
are u sure u could do that?
Old 12-15-2010, 11:31 AM
  #11  
TECH Regular
 
nodrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

leak test and slap it in there. Its a better bang for the buck untouched. When you go FI do it right with forged rotating assembly, drop the CR. This is what I would to to ensure reliability. Remember there is no guarantees with used, so just let it eat after leak down test if okay.



Quick Reply: Rebuilding a higher mileage 5.3 in preparation for forced induction



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 AM.