need4z

iTrader: (5)

Wondering since they are never advertised...

JPH

iTrader: (2)

I have them @home. I get them and post them up. These heads atleast on LPEs flowbench, weren't very happy above .600 on @3.900 bore.

need4z

iTrader: (5)

Thanks. Im just curious. I sorta guessed they hit a wall past .600" since they are not advertised past that.

02Z28

iTrader: (11)

I have the flow numbers off my old TEA TFS 215... Don't know if that would help you any.

Engine_HP

iTrader: (1)

Im also interested.

JPH

iTrader: (2)

Intake @.600=314
@.650=292

Exhaust @.600=220
@.650=223

These are independent results from LPEs flowbench on a 3.900 bore.

Engine_HP

iTrader: (1)

What was it dooing on earlier lifts ?

need4z

iTrader: (5)

Thanks. No wonder TEA doesn't advertise them. Shows that anything much over .600" - .610" is a waste, not producing anymore hp and straining the valvetrain.

JPH

iTrader: (2)

The heads would be alot better, if you were to have someone like Brain Tooley of any great head guy work on them, so that don't do that after .600 lift. There springs run like 160lbs. on the seat also.

JPH

iTrader: (2)

I post that up later this week.

need4z

iTrader: (5)

True.

Engine_HP

iTrader: (1)

Great

JPH

iTrader: (2)

Intake Exhaust
.200=140 .200=107.5
.300=208 .300=155
.400=260 .400=196
.450=276 .450=205
.500=292 .500=212
.550=306 .550=217
.600=314 .600=220
.650=292 .650=223

These heads were flowed on a 3.900 bore and with a 1.750.

Hope this helps, Joe

WS6RED2002TA

Very intresting. Thanks for posting.

Here is what was sent to me from VR:

.100 68.6 59.3
.200 137.9 118.7
.300 217.9 185.7
.400 271.6 228.3
.500 304.3 249.4
.550 312.7 255.8
.600 319.2 260.3

Hope this helps.

Engine_HP

iTrader: (1)

i wounder why these heads looses CFM with higher lifts.

thanks for sharing.

JPH

iTrader: (2)

Sorry, I was informed these TFS heads were NOT flowed with a pipe.