Did anyone here measure the P/V clearance changes from a TR230 to any G5X cam?
#1
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did anyone here measure the P/V clearance changes from a TR230 to any G5X cam?
I'm trying to figure out how much less clearance there'd be switching from a TR230 cam to any of the G5X cams.....anyone know? Please list which G5X cam you have, and what LSA it's on. Thanks!
#2
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
It's gonna be a BIG decrease in clearance dude. I can't exactly answer your question, but going from a 230/224 to a 232/240 is going to GREATLY reduce clearance. The smartest thing to do would be pull the pass. side head, being the easier one, and measure your PV the right way. Better safe than sorry.....
#5
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2001CamaroGuy
needs more room than you have
#6
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
Originally Posted by verbs
not necessarily....it seems I should be able to fit a G5X2 cam in the car, and possibly a G5X3 if we play with the ICL a little bit....it's gonna take some customization.
#7
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Damian
Carefull playing with ICL's. Remember that doing that will most certainly increase PV, but will take your low-mid range power and move it up. I'd hate to see how high a G5X3 would need to be spun if backed up a couple more degrees, probably 72-7300
7200 rpms? Bah! What's another 200rpms considering I already spin her to 7000rpms as is . I'm anticipating this cam peaking at around 6600rpms or so.
Trending Topics
#8
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
The G5X3 should still be a low-mid range improvement, and idle better to boot.
7200 rpms? Bah! What's another 200rpms considering I already spin her to 7000rpms as is . I'm anticipating this cam peaking at around 6600rpms or so.
7200 rpms? Bah! What's another 200rpms considering I already spin her to 7000rpms as is . I'm anticipating this cam peaking at around 6600rpms or so.
You spin that ****** to 7200 for to long you're gonna have a rod come through the fire wall and smack you in the nutz
josh
#10
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Damian
The G5X3 idle better????!?!?! ......Sorry man, MAJOR disagreement there. Being that the G5X3 is bigger than the X2 (which it is), it's going to idle the same or a tad worse, especially without fine tuning. I wouldn't expect ANY improvements in the driveability area. Not knockin LG, but I know what i've seen with my own 2 eyes....
You spin that ****** to 7200 for to long you're gonna have a rod come through the fire wall and smack you in the nutz
josh
You spin that ****** to 7200 for to long you're gonna have a rod come through the fire wall and smack you in the nutz
josh
#11
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Damian
The G5X3 idle better????!?!?! ......Sorry man, MAJOR disagreement there. Being that the G5X3 is bigger than the X2 (which it is), it's going to idle the same or a tad worse
#13
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by verbs
My TR230 has no low-mid range power to begin with. Quite honestly this cam sucks for anything but top end. The G5X3 should still be a low-mid range improvement, and idle better to boot.
sorry, i guess i don't really have anything to add to your question about PtV clearance, just had to throw that out there.
just my $.02. good luck to you
#14
TECH Enthusiast
I have the TR230 cam also. I'm making over 300rwtq from 2,000 rpm on stock heads. I drive my car everyday, highway, around town, in traffic. I have stock 3.42 gears and dont have any problems. Pulls hard in the mid-range rpm band and really rips on top end. I thought about the G5X2 cam but wasnt crazy about the high lift numbers and trying to find springs that would hold up to daily driving (my daily driving at that ) abuse
#15
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KGSloan
i'd be real supprised if you picked up very much down low, if any. in fact, the tr230 has great low end power. this cam has a GREAT torque curve for a bigger cam. i've got 300rwtq at 2500rpms
My car makes no more power w/ heads and cam than it did with bolt ons until about 4500rpms.
#16
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
verbs, i have the X2 and 5.3 TEA II heads. i have one of the earlier sets of TEAs and made 428 rwhp and 390 ftlbs of torque. this was through a 12 bolt with 4.30s and 18x10 V1s on 315 tires. my car is very streetable and pulls hard. it ran an 11.8 on a bad 1.8 60' at 4200 ft. above sea level.
#17
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by verbs
My car made 310rwtq@2500rpms with just bolt ons.
My car makes no more power w/ heads and cam than it did with bolt ons until about 4500rpms.
My car makes no more power w/ heads and cam than it did with bolt ons until about 4500rpms.
having said that, going to a g5x2/3 is going to cause you to lose low end compared to your tr230 (below 2500rpms). those cams are not going to increase driveability and torque around town at 1500rpms. they have a lot more overlap and won't run as good down there. don't take this the wrong way, i'm just trying to help you out. if you still want the g5x cams for the added power from 3000 rpms up, go for it. hell, i'm considering this swap as well. however, if i was looking for better driveability and torque down low, i wouldn't consider these cams. they are great cams and i'm sure you will gain horsepower up top, just don't expect it to idle and drive easier around town
Last edited by KGSloan; 02-13-2004 at 12:30 PM.
#19
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SilverGhost
I may be recalling incorrectly but wasn't there a post not long ago from someone who just went to the X3 about how it seems to make power up top, loss of mid range and low compared to the X2 he had previously?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/135758-switched-g5x2-112-g5x3-114-first-thoughts.html
#20
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SilverGhost
I may be recalling incorrectly but wasn't there a post not long ago from someone who just went to the X3 about how it seems to make power up top, loss of mid range and low compared to the X2 he had previously?