Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Another internet myth bites the dust... LS7 vs. LS1 lifters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:59 PM
  #1  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Another internet myth bites the dust... LS7 vs. LS1 lifters

Ok, so after having hundreds of customers calling me asking about pushrod length with LS7 lifter, I have finally decided to stop everthing today and take some actual measurments of the 2 lifters...

First of all, I already knew this was a myth based on actual preload measurments I've taken over the years since the "LS7" lifter came out. Secondly, since GM has superseded the LS1 lifter with the LS7 lifter I knew they wouldn't have been able to do that without making a pushrod length change as well...

If you take a look at each lifter from the pushrod side, the LS7 pushrod cup appears to be approximately .025" higher in the lifter body. HOWEVER, if you take the actual measurment that matters which is the distance from the tip of the roller to the base of the pushrod cup, the lifters are virtually identical. Overall, the LS7 lifter body is slightly shorter overall vs. the LS1 lifter hence the illusion of pushrod cup difference.

I hope this helps end the debate. If anyone is interested in performing this measurment I would greatly appreciate it so that I will have some outside verification of my measurments.

Thanks for reading.

Shane

Last edited by XtraCajunSS; 06-02-2011 at 07:09 PM.
Old 06-02-2011, 07:05 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Good to know. Thanks.
Old 06-02-2011, 07:15 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
sjsingle1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 6,497
Received 215 Likes on 176 Posts

Default

made me feel better about the change out
Old 06-02-2011, 07:24 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
gofastwclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: KCMO
Posts: 2,950
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Amazing how many internet myths there are. If I built cars solely based on some of what I read via the internet I would never get one running again.
Old 06-02-2011, 08:43 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Double Aught's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 170
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Thank you for destroying a myth.
Old 06-02-2011, 11:15 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

Holy crap, in all this time no one actually measured? Shame on us for arguing aimlessly.
Old 06-02-2011, 11:35 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
mattster03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Cool... it is amazing how quickly false info gets spread
Old 06-02-2011, 11:37 PM
  #8  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
lsgriff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just send me a set of each. i'll get ya some measurements from roller to the bottom of the cup within .0001"
Old 06-03-2011, 05:10 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

You are correct. We have someone on another forum I belong to that works for GM and he has stated for years installation requirements remain the same. It only makes sense otherwise they would have had to issue TSB's for lifter replacement specifying different pushrods plus later motors would have had to have new parts, which means more logistics to keep different parts in stock, etc.
Old 06-03-2011, 08:28 AM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mattster03
Cool... it is amazing how quickly false info gets spread
I know right?

Did you know truck coils add 10rwhp? And Granatellli plug wires another 15rwhp? That's as much power as full exhaust hiding in the ignition system alone!



Old 06-03-2011, 11:53 AM
  #11  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
t-trimz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kyle, TX
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
I know right?

Did you know truck coils add 10rwhp? And Granatellli plug wires another 15rwhp? That's as much power as full exhaust hiding in the ignition system alone!



No, it's the MSD wires that add 15 to the wheels.
Old 06-03-2011, 01:26 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
180ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

great thread, and thanks for taking the time to do that
Old 06-03-2011, 02:00 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,309
Received 857 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

This makes me feel better I won't have to buy another set of pushrods. I never could understand why GM would change a lifter that would require different pushrods.
Old 06-03-2011, 02:15 PM
  #14  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Thanks, Guys. I've always known it was a myth because I check lifter preload on every cam swap I do. The results have always told me the pushrod cups had to be the same distance from the camshaft. Its just that no one ever wanted to believe me! I guess 100+ cams swaps a year don't count for much when you're trying to make appropriate component recommendations...

Shane
Old 06-03-2011, 02:22 PM
  #15  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
mattster03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

so what i'm still confused about is where the "0.025" came from? was that just people eye-balling that picture we've all seen of the two lifters side-by-side? Or did someone actually take a measurement once? maybe they took it from the top edge of the lifter to the cup vs. the correct measurement from the tangent of the roller to the cup?
Old 06-03-2011, 02:31 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
Raptor_WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

so can use my ls1 trays on ls7 lifters?
Old 06-03-2011, 02:33 PM
  #17  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (116)
 
BIG_MIKE2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Skiatook, OK
Posts: 5,222
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Finally someone smashed this officially. I have been running the LS7's since they first started replacing the LS1's with them. When I did my cam swap I just used the same length pushrod you would have ordered for stock LS1 lifters & have never had a issue, never measured & its got almost 70k miles on the combo.
Old 06-03-2011, 02:34 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (116)
 
BIG_MIKE2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Skiatook, OK
Posts: 5,222
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Raptor_WS6
so can use my ls1 trays on ls7 lifters?
Yes, I'm using the stock set in my car, they had 100k on them when the lifters got swapped & they werent loose like some people complain about.
Old 06-21-2011, 06:38 PM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by XtraCajunSS
Ok, so after having hundreds of customers calling me asking about pushrod length with LS7 lifter, I have finally decided to stop everthing today and take some actual measurments of the 2 lifters...

First of all, I already knew this was a myth based on actual preload measurments I've taken over the years since the "LS7" lifter came out. Secondly, since GM has superseded the LS1 lifter with the LS7 lifter I knew they wouldn't have been able to do that without making a pushrod length change as well...

If you take a look at each lifter from the pushrod side, the LS7 pushrod cup appears to be approximately .025" higher in the lifter body. HOWEVER, if you take the actual measurment that matters which is the distance from the tip of the roller to the base of the pushrod cup, the lifters are virtually identical. Overall, the LS7 lifter body is slightly shorter overall vs. the LS1 lifter hence the illusion of pushrod cup difference.

I hope this helps end the debate. If anyone is interested in performing this measurment I would greatly appreciate it so that I will have some outside verification of my measurments.

Thanks for reading.

Shane
I am trying to reconcile this information with this subsequent thread:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...size-vids.html

Any help?
Old 06-21-2011, 08:51 PM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
crainholio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mattster03
Cool... it is amazing how quickly false info gets spread
And by people who seem very smart over TEH INTARWEBZ too...


Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
No way. You must be doing this comment by deduction not by actualy measuring roller to inside cup area (where p-rod tip lies).

You have nothing stock to point to that. AFR heads, comp cam and YT rockers. All of which will never give you a deduction on your comments.
It is .050 taller at the cup period (actual measurement)


Quick Reply: Another internet myth bites the dust... LS7 vs. LS1 lifters



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.