Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

7.3 @ 95 w/stock 317's, LQ9, and TSP Tsunami, what next (on a budget)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2011, 09:25 AM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
dville_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 7.3 @ 95 w/stock 317's, LQ9, and TSP Tsunami, what next (on a budget)?

Car went 7.3 in the 1/8th with a crappy 1.8 60' (on et streets). It's a Mustang Coupe with a th350, 4400 stall, 3.73's, 28in et streets, long tubes, ls6 intake, lq9, stock 317's, and a tsp tsunami cam with tsp pushrods.

I really think the car can do a 6.99 the way it sits, but this was the first time out and I ended up finding out I had some funky air pressure in my slicks (bad pressure gauge, one slick was around 15psi the other over 20psi causing the car to spin for 30-60ft).


Anyways, what would be your next step considering that I am on a very tight budget?
Old 06-07-2011, 09:37 AM
  #2  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Sales4@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I would try and dump the 317s and pick up some 243 casting heads. Out of the box they should pick you up some noticeable power because you will get a healthy bump in compression. If its in the budget to get them ported I would do so because they can pick up some pretty decent power for a stock casting head.
Old 06-07-2011, 12:57 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
dville_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

how will piston to valve clearance be with the 243 heads and what is reasonable for a decent set?

could i not just mill the 317's or would that surely give me ptv clearance issues?
Old 06-07-2011, 03:16 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
TooLateVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FredVegas, Va
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That thing needs 4.10's, IMO.

Heads would be a very good leap in power, the torque you'll get from the compression bump would be very useful.
Old 06-07-2011, 04:00 PM
  #5  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Sales4@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dville_gt
how will piston to valve clearance be with the 243 heads and what is reasonable for a decent set?

could i not just mill the 317's or would that surely give me ptv clearance issues?
You don't lose any clearance by going to a 243 head. It just has a smaller chamber. You could mill the 317s but I don't think you would be able to get them down to a 64cc chamber and still have any clearance. That would be a .050" mill which is pretty aggressive with that cam spec you have. I am not sure what the going rate on stock castings LS6s is right now.
Old 06-07-2011, 04:09 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
 
Quick Sh0t xMLx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Spray it.
Old 06-07-2011, 10:30 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
94dragbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ottumwa, IA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm giving another vote for spray
Old 06-07-2011, 10:40 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

great ETs for the combo.you can sell the 317s to some one going boosted .or mill them and get a smaller cam.if you want to keep your current cam get some 243/799 heads.if you can afford it consider some TSP PRC st 1 ls6 heads.what intake/injectors/TB do you have?
Old 06-08-2011, 03:41 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
Samer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JohnJanz@Texas-Speed
You don't lose any clearance by going to a 243 head. It just has a smaller chamber. You could mill the 317s but I don't think you would be able to get them down to a 64cc chamber and still have any clearance. That would be a .050" mill which is pretty aggressive with that cam spec you have. I am not sure what the going rate on stock castings LS6s is right now.
Up to my knowledge, the 317 heads have the same casting of the 243 but with a bigger chamber. Milling them down to 64 will give you the same performance of 243 heads.

Also, I think that it's 0.006 of milling per cc. So, to drop the chamber size of the stock 317s from 70cc to 64cc, he will need to mill them 0.036. With 64cc for chamber size and stock head gasket, I don't think the Tsunami cam will have any PTV clearance issues.

Just my .02 and please correct me if I'm wrong.

Last edited by Samer; 06-08-2011 at 03:49 AM.
Old 06-08-2011, 03:47 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

^^^you're misinformed there sir. TSP was dead on the money. 317s are around 72cc. 50 thousandths is a lot to mill off a set of heads, possibly causing intake alignment issues and PTV clearance issues. A set of 243s gives you 64cc chambers but keeping stock alignment and PTV specs. THAT is why the nod goes to the 243 castings in this case.
Old 06-08-2011, 05:30 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
 
Samer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thank you 01ssreda4 for the clarification about 317s chamber size.

Would it be an option to mill the heads 0.035 and go for 0.040 head gasket?
Old 06-08-2011, 08:10 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
dville_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by garygnu
great ETs for the combo.you can sell the 317s to some one going boosted .or mill them and get a smaller cam.if you want to keep your current cam get some 243/799 heads.if you can afford it consider some TSP PRC st 1 ls6 heads.what intake/injectors/TB do you have?
I am running stock ls6 intake/ls7 injectors/stock ported truck throttle body. I will do nitrous at some point, but I really want a 6.9x time slip on motor before I throw a 150 shot on it.

My buddy has a coupe with an aggressive sbc and was going 6.9/7.0 and trapping 94mph.

My 1.8 60's were just not cutting it, I've only had the car out to the track the one time, it was 98* outside and I went on a "street night" so all the street tires were killing track prep (coupled with me not having a anti-roll bar). I figure if I could get my 60 foot down to a 1.6 or better and in a little better air the car has a 6.99 in it as it sits. I figure if I swap out for a better set of heads it'd go even faster.

I wasn't all too disappointed with my numbers considering the car has never been on a dyno (just tuned with a wideband on the street), but 6's on a junk yard motor just has a better ring to it!

Anyone got any input on what would be a reasonable price for a set of 243's (and what is the difference between them and 799's) and what is a reasonable price to sell my 317's (off a 70k mile 2005 escalade motor).
Old 06-08-2011, 08:20 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Samer
Thank you 01ssreda4 for the clarification about 317s chamber size.

Would it be an option to mill the heads 0.035 and go for 0.040 head gasket?

It doesn't matter what brings the head down, the results are the same. The motor doesn't know if you achieved .050 by head gasket, milling, decking the block, or all 3. The end results is the head .050 closer to the block/pistons with the corresponding PTV clearance, intake alignment, and compression bump.
Old 06-08-2011, 09:33 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Just get it to hook, that should be very very close to 6.9.

Chrs1313 RAM sir would be my next move after figuring out your hooking issue. You don't need any tuning changes, easy install, cheap, proven gains.

If that doesnt do the trick then I would swap the 317s for either 243s or try to find a used 5.3 2.5 or stg1 ls6 head if budget allows. 243s run about 500, used ported heads run about 800. Extra 300$ to more or less guarantee your 6.9 mark.
Old 06-08-2011, 09:50 AM
  #15  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
jetaws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If you cut the 60' to a 1.5 you shouldnt have a problem hitting your 6.9's
Old 06-08-2011, 09:54 AM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

What brand converter?

Honestly a good 4400 shouldn't have a problem hitting 1.4s unless you are in a bad DA which I don't think is the case.
Old 06-08-2011, 10:19 AM
  #17  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Sales4@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Samer
Up to my knowledge, the 317 heads have the same casting of the 243 but with a bigger chamber. Milling them down to 64 will give you the same performance of 243 heads.

Also, I think that it's 0.006 of milling per cc. So, to drop the chamber size of the stock 317s from 70cc to 64cc, he will need to mill them 0.036. With 64cc for chamber size and stock head gasket, I don't think the Tsunami cam will have any PTV clearance issues.

Just my .02 and please correct me if I'm wrong.
Milling .036" off of any stock casting head is a pretty decent amount. Those heads milled that much would NOT fit with a tsunami cam or anything similar to it. I see the other misconceptions were already cleared up.
Old 06-08-2011, 10:24 AM
  #18  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
dville_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
Just get it to hook, that should be very very close to 6.9.

Chrs1313 RAM sir would be my next move after figuring out your hooking issue. You don't need any tuning changes, easy install, cheap, proven gains.

If that doesnt do the trick then I would swap the 317s for either 243s or try to find a used 5.3 2.5 or stg1 ls6 head if budget allows. 243s run about 500, used ported heads run about 800. Extra 300$ to more or less guarantee your 6.9 mark.
This motor is in a Mustang, so I wouldn't be able to use the Chrs1313 setup, as sad as it sound right now I am actually using a homemade intake tube that is just 3in PVC pipe that comes out of my intake elbow/maf and bring the filter over towards the drivers side of the car then drops it down to near the bottom of the radiator core support. I did just have the filter on the end of the MAF but the IAT reading were like 185* so I figured I had to do something. I am going to make a good intake pipe for it out of some 4 inch pipe but I was in a rush and did what I had to do.

So around $500 for some 243's then flip my 317's for 250 or so? What is the difference between the 243's and the 799's? Any idea how much e.t. the stock 243's would be worth vs. the 799's?

Originally Posted by lemons12
What brand converter?

Honestly a good 4400 shouldn't have a problem hitting 1.4s unless you are in a bad DA which I don't think is the case.
It is a custom built converter by Mikes Trickshift, he builds a lot of transmissions/converters for big hp cars out here. I had him build my th350 and this converter. It'll footbrake to about 3500rpm and flashes just over 4400. I am not sure what the DA was, this is in Dallas/Ft. Worth Texas so we are pretty close to sea level, but it was SUPER hot that day!
Old 06-08-2011, 10:48 AM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dville_gt
This motor is in a Mustang, so I wouldn't be able to use the Chrs1313 setup, as sad as it sound right now I am actually using a homemade intake tube that is just 3in PVC pipe that comes out of my intake elbow/maf and bring the filter over towards the drivers side of the car then drops it down to near the bottom of the radiator core support. I did just have the filter on the end of the MAF but the IAT reading were like 185* so I figured I had to do something. I am going to make a good intake pipe for it out of some 4 inch pipe but I was in a rush and did what I had to do.

So around $500 for some 243's then flip my 317's for 250 or so? What is the difference between the 243's and the 799's? Any idea how much e.t. the stock 243's would be worth vs. the 799's?

It is a custom built converter by Mikes Trickshift, he builds a lot of transmissions/converters for big hp cars out here. I had him build my th350 and this converter. It'll footbrake to about 3500rpm and flashes just over 4400. I am not sure what the DA was, this is in Dallas/Ft. Worth Texas so we are pretty close to sea level, but it was SUPER hot that day!
Ahhh forgot ab it being a mustang.

I personally wouldn't swap the heads just yet. I would say you would see a .1 and 1mph increase however. I have never seen anyone going from 317s to 243s. I run ported milled 317s and they are getting the job done. If you are doing the work and tuning, might be something to consider, if not I would hold off.

I most definitely would get it 60' the way it should. I see no reason not to be in the 1.4s. That alone should let you hit your mark. I cut 1.50-1.52s barely spinning 370rwhp ptc 4000 373s 2200da..7.30-7.32@94.5.. raceweight is 3450 which I'm sure is heavier than you.



Quick Reply: 7.3 @ 95 w/stock 317's, LQ9, and TSP Tsunami, what next (on a budget)?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.